Transcript

IHIP News: Trump DOES NOT Want People Seeing BOMBSHELL Testimony!! Too Little TOO LATE?!

From I've Had It · Episode page · Watch on YouTube

· 18 min · 2,823 words · 28 timestamped sections

This is the full, timestamped transcript of "IHIP News: Trump DOES NOT Want People Seeing BOMBSHELL Testimony!! Too Little TOO LATE?!", an episode of I've Had It published January 6, 2026 (18 min, about 2,823 words). It mentions 25 people, works and ideas, including United States Department of Justice, Democratic Party (United States), Republican Party (United States), Special counsel, Attorney General of the United States.

What is discussed, and when

  1. – 3:00: Attorney General of the United States, Special counsel
  2. – 6:00: Right-wing media
  3. – 9:00: Democracy Now!, Mike McCarthy, Reuters
  4. – 12:00: East Wing, Pinterest, The Hague, White House
  5. – 17:54: Kremlin, Lindsey Graham, Oklahoma City, Special counsel

Notable quotes from "IHIP News: Trump DOES NOT Want People Seeing BOMBSHELL Testimony!! Too Little TOO LATE?!"

  • Department when they took office in January of 2020 should have been a special counsel appointment. Immediately appointed. We all saw what we saw. I don't need to hear one bit…
    about Special counsel · at
  • Integrity. We assume no one's going to forget. And they allowed the machine of Donald Trump and the right-wing media and Fox News to turn it into a dust up.
    about Right-wing media · at
  • We heard Mike McCarthy say that Trump was I don't care. he was flippant. He did not give a [ __ ] He did not want to send help because he sat there and he lied to people for three.
    about Mike McCarthy · at
  • So, here is an article from Reuters where Jack Smith said Trump knew that he lost. Pop this up. Amy Ciskin, whom I absolutely love with Democracy Now, tweets, Jack Smith says Trump.
    about Reuters · at
  • Justice department. And I believe Jack Smith because he has served in as a prosecutor at the Hague to make objective decisions based on fact and not politics. And then you see…
    about The Hague · at
  • He fed people full of lies that he knew were impressionable because he didn't want to leave the White House, which is why it's so [ __ ] terrifying what he's going to build at…
    about White House · at
  • Broken and exploitative. But in this moment, in that moment, Trump was banned from everything. I think even Pinterest chimed in was Yeah, we're banning Donald Trump. We're Okay, whatever, Pinterest. but he was a complete pariah.
    about Pinterest · at
  • Of course he would have gotten a conviction. People, we were sitting in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and we could see Trump's culpability. Of course, he would have gotten a…
    about Oklahoma City · at

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

Companies & orgs

Concepts & topics

Places & events

  • The Hague — Place · 1 mention · first at
  • White House — Place · 1 mention · first at
  • East Wing — Place · 1 mention · first at
    Want to leave the White House, which is why it's so [ __ ] terrifying what he's going to build at the where the old East Wing was. And I here's what's so stunning to me about…
  • Oklahoma City — Place · 1 mention · first at

Full transcript with timestamps

The number one job of the Biden Justice Department when they took office in January of 2020 should have been a special counsel appointment. Immediately immediately appointed. We all saw what we saw. I don't need to hear one bit of testimony from Jack Smith, who I think has done an excellent job, but he wasn't appointed until 2022. I don't need to hear one bit of his sworn testimony to know what my eyes showed me. It [snorts] showed me a uh president of the United States riing up a bunch of rubes to march to the capital to storm it. And when relief never showed up, I knew it was an inside job.

It doesn't take that much of deduction skills to figure this out. Yet Joe Biden's DOJ failed America, failed democracy, and Jack Smith was not appointed for 2 years. Two years after all of these cops were beat up, after Congress was completely ramsacked, people took a [ __ ] in there. But now everybody, and I commend Jack Smith's work. I think he's smart. I think he's an incredible prosecutor. he should have been appointed January 22nd, 2020, whatever the date is that after Joe Biden got uh into office. Anyway, here are some of the items coming out of this. And again, I want to remind you, we all knew this. We all saw it. This isn't new information. Pop this up.

Seth McFarland tweets, amid whitewashing of history of capital siege, new transcript of house interview with Jack Smith highlights police injuries, cracked ribs, traumatic brain injuries, smashed spinal discs, and heart attacks as riers used bats, poles, chemical sprays, stolen police shields, and batons. And so they um they asked Jack Smith, "Are you aware that more than 140 police officers who were injured by the proTrump mob on January 6 sustaining injuries?" And then they list all the all the injuries. Are you aware of those facts on that day? Jack Smith responds very much. So they asked Jack Smith this, "Do you believe that pardoning individuals like this who committed crimes against law enforcement that day makes our country safe?"

Jack Smith responds, "It does not in my view." And this is what's so frustrating about reading this to you right now is so many people are like, "I we told you it was bad." And it's like we've always known it was bad. It It's that that this is like people are somehow like taking a victory lap with this. We all saw it. We all knew it. Trump had two years with his freak show friends, the Kraken lawyer and the My Pillow guy to just completely whitewash all of this. And all of the pro cop, I'm the blue line American. I stand with the troops. I'm law and order. They all are liars. every bit of it is pro- crime, pro power, pro uh we want the biggest piece of [ __ ] to be in charge so we can get away with anything.

So we're not held to the same standard that everybody else is stands up to. And it's just it's so sickening that we have such smart minds like Jack Smith who is an incredible incredible DOJ employee and he is relegated to this deposition that gets dropped on New Year's Eve, right? that they would not that Congress would not put for public consumption at the time that it's all happening, you know, backwards. I saw all of this stuff come out. My blood was boiling. I was so [ __ ] mad at Meritt Garland, Donald Trump, I'm sorry, and Joe Biden because I was like, you [ __ ] could have stopped this on a dime, but you didn't because you thought, no, everybody knows what happened. Everybody saw it. We assume people are going to have integrity. We assume no one's going to forget. And they allowed the machine of Donald Trump and the right-wing media and Fox News to turn it into a dust up.

And it also reminded me that our senator uh booster box Mark Wayne Mullen is cowering in [snorts] the capital and he has run around on every interview and excused Trump's behavior on this. It makes me sick. They know exactly what he did. And also what an indictment this is on all of these billionaire tech leaders.

Yeah. that we all saw it and that they all colluded to make sure that this man, this criminal, this criminal who could not accept that he lost, who wanted to throw feces, literal feces all over, who wanted his vice president killed, that these industry titans, that these people who have made so much money off of a rigged economic system in their favor and that they wanted him to get elected again. This whole Jack Smith thing is an indictment on the Democratic party.

Absolutely. For not taking the appointment of DOJ, the most serious appointment of our lifetime. And we don't get Jack Smith until 2022. It's just it's crazy. All right, here is Jack Smith on um Trump refusing to send help to the capital. Play the clip.

Uh that violence started. The president refused to stop it. Um he endangered the life of his vice president. Then he's getting calls and not just not calls from from Democrats, not calls from people he doesn't know, calls from people he trusts, calls from people he relies on, uh, and still refuses um to come to the aid of the people at the capital. That's very important evidence for criminal intent in our case.

We heard Mike uh Mike McCarthy say that Trump was like, I don't care. I mean, he was flippant. He did not give a [ __ ] He did not want to send help because he sat there and he lied to people for three months about a stolen election knowing they believed him when he knew it was a lie. These [ __ ] lie like they breathe. Are you kidding me? Sorry. Um and I think it's interesting to point out that this video that we just saw of Jack Smith, this used to be kind of the Republican law and order default setting. the Republican party just like 10 years ago, this type of of litigator in the DOJ that is fact driven, law driven, uh procedural driven, that was kind of a default setting. Typically, a lot of these law enforcements, if you go to their uh voter registration, are Republicans. In just 10 years, Donald Trump has taken to where now his position, which is fact-based, following the laws procedures, is now some woke

issue, right? And it's stunning to me the death spiral and the 180 degree turn of country club Republicans. They used to like that used to be kind of their MMO. this type of this type of DOJ, this type of FBI, and now it's just a complete mockery of what it once was. So, here is an article from Reuters where Jack Smith said Trump knew that he lost. Pop this up. Um Amy Ciskin, whom I absolutely love with Democracy Now, tweets, Jack Smith says Trump acknowledged to others that he lost the 2020 election. We know this and this is not new information. But then it brings us to a video where Jack Smith says that Trump was the most culpable person in January 6. And just the day that I watched it, while I was at my interior design office and I'm watching the whole thing, I knew exactly who was at the epicenter of this entire thing. I know who started it. I know who refused to stop it. I know who finally stopped it.

It was abundantly obvious to anybody that even has a a a an average IQ what this was all about. Play the clip.

Uh the evidence here made clear that President Trump was by a large measure the most culpable and most responsible person in this conspiracy. The these crimes were committed uh for his benefit. Um the attack that happened at the capital as part of this case does not happen without him. Um the other co-conspirators were doing this for his benefit. So in terms of uh why we would pursue uh a case against him. Uh I entirely disagree with any characterization uh that our work uh was in any way meant to hamper him in the presidential election. Uh I would never um take orders from a political uh leader to uh hamper another person in an election. Uh

you know it's interesting because Trump all he talked about during his campaign for 2024 was weaponization of the justice department. And I believe Jack Smith because he has served in as a prosecutor at the Hague to make objective decisions based on fact and not politics. And then you see Trump goes in and he just makes DOJ his own personal attorney. But Donald Trump knew he lost. Donald Trump wanted to stay in office, which goes back to the billionaires. They they want him in office, too, because they get whatever the [ __ ] they want. They are okay with the president that launched a coup because they get what they want. And Donald Trump did not want to leave office. He He paid his own money. He pays his own money for [ __ ] nothing.

He paid his own money to help this. Nobody benefited from that action more than Donald Trump. Rudy Rudy Giuliani disbar. You go through the list. You know, people went to jail. This man wanted to overthrow the government. Full stop. There is no other way around it. He fed people full of lies that he knew were impressionable because he didn't want to leave the White House, which is why it's so [ __ ] terrifying what he's going to build at the where the old East Wing was. And I here's what's so stunning to me about the whole Jack Smith thing. And I want to take it back to the oligarchs. After January 6th, Trump was banned. Yes. by all of these oligarchs on all of these sites because what he did was so illegal and dangerous and harmful and criminal and he was banned from all of these places. He was a pariah and then two years go by before Jack Smith is even able to start his investigation. And in those two years

that we did not see this criminal act quickly and efficiently and immediately rectified, it broke a lot of people. It broke the oligarchs. And there's an episode we could do later that they've always been broken and exploitative. But in this moment, in that moment, Trump was banned from everything. I think even Pinterest chimed in was like, "Yeah, we're banning Donald Trump." We're like, "Okay, whatever, Pinterest." but he was a complete pariah. And these types of hearings where you hear an incredibly intelligent person, spit facts based on evidence used to be the norm, right? Republicans, the Republican party used to get off on this kind of [ __ ] this type of law and order accountability style hearings. And I'm just so fascinated how in such a short period of time, the entire country has been completely broken. And then when you hear him do this, like nothing Jack Smith says surprises me. Nothing.

No. What surprises me is that we're just now hearing it at the end of 2025, at the beginning of 2026, six years later. What a failure of the Justice Department. What a fail failure of the United States of America. What a failure of all of the uh industry titans and uh political leaders who have bent the knee to him and even Democrats who have voted for a lot of his people in his cabinet.

After January 6, any Democrat, even the vote for Marco Rubio, no, it's disqualifying. If Marco Rubio wants to go work for a man that put his vice president's life in danger, put everybody in the capital at danger, something's wrong with Marco Rubio. That should have not been a 99 and0 vote. That should have been a zero to 999 vote. And something about this whole thing broke our country. And if you're a Republican and you've triple Trumped, it broke you and it made you worse of a person that you are. And if you're a progressive like we are, it [snorts] broke us. And we're descending into nihilism and fear and absolutely no faith, none whatsoever in any institution, most importantly for me, the Democratic Party because there has to be an opposition party. There has to be an opposition to this. And time and time again, the Democrats have not proven to be that. They've proven that they dip their toes on both sides of it.

And it's just so infuriating. And I'll leave you with this. Jack Smith said he would have gotten a conviction. Surprise, surprise. Play the clip.

Let's just start with the bottom line up front. One of your investigations focused on whether any person violated the law in connection with efforts to interfere in the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 election. Is that correct?

Yes. At the conclusion of that investigation related to the interference and the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 election, when your office indicted Mr. Trump for his criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election. Did you believe that you had sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction against Mr. Donald Trump?

Yes. For these charges coming from Mr. Trump's criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election, did you believe that you had sufficient evidence to prove these charges beyond reasonable doubt?

Yes. And we know that it's more than just a reasonable doubt. Did you believe that there were multiple substantial federal interests in proceeding with prosecuting Mr. Trump after he attempted to criminally overturn the 2020 election? I did.

Of course he would have gotten a conviction. People, we were sitting in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and we could see Trump's culpability. Of course, he would have gotten a criminal conviction, [snorts] but he didn't get the chance because of the absolute failure of Merrick Garland and Joe Biden. There's just no there's no question about it. This is such a travesty. And now hearings like this, which America's had a lot of problems. But when there is wrongdoing, we have put experts like Jack Smith in charge of of factf finding missions in the DOJ or special counsel's office to go and bird dog out what really happened and use procedures and policies that are fair and legal and sane. And now you have Cash Cha-ching Patel Money out on a bender drinking with his pals talking about his country music sensation girlfriend on Twitter.

Hey, we have the suspect JK. JK. No, we don't have the suspect. And it's just that type of decorum. [clears throat] Oh, and intelligence that is gone. That's what they thought the deep state was, which was all a ruse because what they saw as the deep state were independent jurists like him. And now they are putting all Trump loyalists in. And now we really have a swamp and we really have a deep state. And they are embedding these people in all over the the government. You have even people that are handpicked from the Kremlin that have very high positions of power in the government. You have a bunch of these tech oligarch people that have been given high positions in the United States Army. And it you can dig deeper and deeper and deeper into this, but this is just it to me the whole Jack Smith thing I was surprised zero on any of it. But it caused me an intense amount of sadness because those days of

hearings like this of accountability of people following the rule of law are gone. And that used to be something the Republican party embraced. That that that's the kind of stuff where the party of the quorum and of rule of law and blah blah. And now they're just, you know, you got Flea Bag Lindsey Graham and Moses Mike Grinder Johnson and all these [ __ ] that just go on Fox News and just humiliate and embarrass themselves and it's just it's really difficult to be an American. It's really difficult.

And you look at it and you think you cannot shame the shameless. They have no shame.

All right, that's all we have. We'll be back later with more news.

Questions about this episode

What is discussed in "IHIP News: Trump DOES NOT Want People Seeing BOMBSHELL Testimony!! Too Little TOO LATE?!"?

In order: 0:00 Attorney General of the United States, Special counsel; 3:00 Right-wing media; 6:00 Democracy Now!, Mike McCarthy, Reuters; 9:00 East Wing, Pinterest, The Hague, White House; 15:00 Kremlin, Lindsey Graham, Oklahoma City, Special counsel.

What is mentioned in this I've Had It episode?

25 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including United States Department of Justice, Democratic Party (United States), Republican Party (United States), Special counsel, Attorney General of the United States, Right-wing media. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "IHIP News: Trump DOES NOT Want People Seeing BOMBSHELL Testimony!! Too Little TOO LATE?!"?

The episode runs 18 min; the transcript is about 2,823 words in 28 timestamped sections.

More from I've Had It

About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated January 24, 2026.