Shock New Details About Guthrie Kidnapping, and Lemon's Absurd Kimmel Appearance, with Lowry & Cooke

What this episode is about

The search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of "Today Show" host Savannah Guthrie, is intensifying following the discovery of blood and signs of forced entry at her Arizona home, leading authorities to investigate a possible kidnapping. Law enforcement officials have confirmed that DNA tests so far indicate the blood belongs solely to Nancy, raising concerns about her wellbeing amid ongoing investigations.

Key takeaways

• When blood trails lead outside, it’s less 'walk of shame' and more 'abduction investigation'.
• Sheriff's mixed messages: is he trying to keep hope alive, or is he veiling grim realities?
• Nancy's meds are critical—proof that time isn’t just ticking, it’s ticking ominously.
• Savannah’s plea for prayers shows that vulnerability is a family’s strength in times of crisis.
• In a world of touch DNA, absence of evidence may simply mean a careful abductor, not innocence.

Who speaks in this episode?

• Megan Kelly (Guest) · 1 h speaking
• James Fitzgerald (Guest) · 20 min speaking
• Randy Sutton (Guest) · 20 min speaking
• Savannah Guthrie (Guest) · 5 min speaking
• Chris Nanos (Guest) · 5 min speaking

What is discussed, and when

1. 0:00 – 10:00: Nancy Guthrie, Chris Nanos, Paleo Valley, Randy Sutton
2. 10:00 – 20:00: Savannah Guthrie, James Fitzgerald, Ashley Banfield, Brian Coberger
3. 20:00 – 30:00: Savannah Guthrie, Apple Watch
4. 30:00 – 40:00: Nancy Guthrie
5. 40:00 – 50:00: Nancy Guthrie, Ashley Banfield
6. 50:00 – 1:00:00: Cozy Earth, Megan Kelly
7. 1:20:00 – 1:30:00: Sauna Space, Billy Isish, Savannah Guthrie
8. 1:30:00 – 1:40:00: Billy Isish, Tongva tribe, Jack Antinoff, Nancy Guthrie

Notable quotes from "Shock New Details About Guthrie Kidnapping, and Lemon's Absurd Kimmel Appearance, with Lowry & Cooke"

• Hey everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. It is a race against the clock in the search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. This case is bizarre and disturbing. Law enforcement sources.

  about Nancy Guthrie · at 0:00

• And into the driveway. During an interview with NewsNation this morning, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos would not confirm the reports of blood. But again, those earlier…

  about Chris Nanos · at 0:49

• These are not the meat sticks you grew up with. This is Paleo Valley. Made with 100% grass-fed beef from small-scale regenerative American family farms.

  about Paleo Valley · at 6:54

• They did call in the homicide section.

  about Randy Sutton · at 8:29

• Asleep faster, stay comfortable longer, and honestly, look forward to putting these things on every night. This Valentine's Day season, Cozy Earth is offering a buy one get one…

  about Cozy Earth · at 50:26

• We're going to take a quick break and we will be back and I have a special treat for you guys on Billy Isish. We did a story on her yesterday and there's been quite a…

  about Billy Isish · at 1:26:49

• Over a decade perfecting their fire light spectrum and thousands of studies support the benefits. Elevate your at home wellness with Saunac's Firelight infrared technology. Visit sauna.space/Maggan.

  about Sauna Space · at 1:28:51

• They've contacted Isish's team, quote, to express our appreciation for her comments. It is our hope that in future discussions, the tribe can be explicitly referenced to ensure…

  about Tongva tribe · at 1:31:25

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

• Nancy Guthrie — Person · Missing person / central subject of breaking-news segment · 7 mentions · first at 0:03
  The episode’s lead story is the urgent search for Nancy Guthrie amid evidence of a possible abduction from her Arizona home.
• Megan Kelly — Person · Host · 2 mentions · first at 0:00
  Anchors the segment, frames the reporting, and interviews law-enforcement and FBI-profile expert guests about the alleged abduction.
  Hey everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. It is a race against the clock in the search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. This case is bizarre.
• Savannah Guthrie — Person · Referenced public figure / family member amplifying search · 5 mentions · first at 0:05
  Identified as Nancy Guthrie’s daughter and a Today Show host; her public profile is discussed as relevant to motive and media attention.
  To the Megan Kelly show. It is a race against the clock in the search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. This case is bizarre and disturbing. Law…
• Chris Nanos — Person · Referenced law-enforcement spokesperson / primary official source · 3 mentions · first at 0:53
  As Pima County Sheriff, he provides official updates (DNA evidence, urgency about medication, investigative posture) and is critiqued for inconsistent messaging.
• James Fitzgerald — Person · Guest expert (FBI profiler) · 2 mentions · first at 6:33
  Analyzes victimology, offender planning, media strategy, and investigative tools (DNA, cameras, cell towers) from a profiling and FBI perspective.
  Joining me now in the meantime, James Fitzgerald, former FBI supervisory special agent and criminal profiler and host of the Code Red podcast and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Lieutenant Randy Sutton. He's also founder of the.
• Randy Sutton — Person · Guest expert (law enforcement) · 3 mentions · first at 6:44
  Provides investigative perspective on abduction rarity, search tactics (IR, drones), and the implications of evidence like blood drops and device syncing.
• Billy Isish — Person · Referenced celebrity (culture/politics segment) · 6 mentions · first at 1:26:52
  Discussed for a Grammys remark (“No one is illegal on stolen land”) as an example of celebrity political messaging; used as a springboard for critique.
• Ashley Banfield — Person · Referenced journalist/interviewer · 3 mentions · first at 4:25
  Mentioned as having interviewed Sheriff Nanos on her podcast, providing additional context and quotes that shaped the host’s interpretation of the sheriff’s tone.
  Talking about this. That was my impression, too. He did a lengthy interview with Ashley Banfield on her podcast yesterday, Drop Dead serious.
• Brian Coberger — Person · Referenced criminal case comparator · 3 mentions · first at 2:26
  Invoked as an example of touch-DNA sensitivity and offender precautions (“so careful... every inch... covered”). Name appears to be a misspelling of Bryan Kohberger.
  Else left DNA, at least not that they've found so far there. Although, with touch DNA being what it is in today's day and age, let's just wait and see on that. I'm sure they…
• Jack Antinoff — Person · Referenced celebrity (culture/politics segment) · 2 mentions · first at 1:35:34
  Used as an example of vague celebrity activism; discussed for wearing an “ICE out” pin and being unable to articulate the issue when questioned.
  Yes. Okay. Now, speaking of someone who hasn't thought it through couple years ago, this guy was in the news for getting married and Taylor Swift went to his wedding. He's…

Companies & orgs

• Tongva tribe — Company · Referenced expert · 2 mentions · first at 1:30:24
  Mentioned in the context of Billy Isish's comments about land ownership and indigenous rights.

Products & tech

• Apple Watch — Product · Incidental · 3 mentions · first at 9:39
  Mentioned in the context of the investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance, specifically regarding her pacemaker syncing.
  The Daily Mail just as we came to air actually citing Fox News for this reporting that Miss Guthy's pacemaker stopped syncing with her Apple Watch in the early hours of Sunday…

Sponsors

• Paleo Valley — Product · Sponsor · 3 mentions · first at 6:56
  Promoted as a healthy snack option during the podcast, emphasizing its benefits and sourcing.
• Cozy Earth — Product · Sponsor · 2 mentions · first at 50:14
  Promoted as a luxury pajama set with a special Valentine's Day offer.
• Sauna Space — Product · Sponsor · 3 mentions · first at 1:28:12
  Promoted as a wellness product offering red light therapy and infrared sauna benefits.

Full transcript with timestamps

0:00 Hey everyone, I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. It is a race against the clock in the search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. This case is bizarre and disturbing. Law enforcement sources telling the Los Angeles Times that blood was found inside of her Arizona home alongside signs of forced entry, prompting detectives to investigate what they now describe as a quote possible kidnapping or abduction. Fox News reporting this morning that their sources say, quote, "Blood drops were also found leading from the entryway outside down the house's pathway toward the driveway." So, both inside the house and a trail leading across the entryway and into the driveway. During an interview with NewsNation this morning, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos would not confirm the reports of blood. But again, those earlier publications are citing law enforcement and said that the

1:02 DNA results that they have tested so far have come back only belonging to Nancy.

1:09 We're not confirming whether there was blood in the home or any of that. What we're saying is um we do have evidence that we submitted to DNA labs actually through um uh uh other sources that we use and they have confirmed that uh the DNA that we found was in fact uh belonged to um uh uh Nancy the the uh Savannah's mom which which we we were hopeful that it wouldn't that it would give us a different profile than just hers but that's where we're at with the DNA. We have other items that we submit for DNA research and see what that comes up. But that was the first uh submitt we've got back and we'll continue to to wait for lab results. See if we find something else.

2:00 So if those reports are real and and accurate, Nancy Guthrie was bleeding. She was hurt somehow inside the house. She was bleeding as she was taken outside of the house. And so far, no DNA belonging to somebody else. That doesn't mean no one else was there. It just means no one else left DNA, at least not that they've found so far there. Although, you know, with touch DNA being what it is in today's day and age, let's just wait and see on that. I'm sure they did a comprehensive um testing of all the surfaces and certainly anything that was near the blood trail to see whether they could get touch DNA and was this person if they actually took her so careful Brian Coberger like that every inch of their person was covered. The odds are against it. The sheriff confirmed that they are still waiting on the results of additional items that have been tested.

2:55 time remains crucial in this case with the sheriff warning that if Nancy does not get certain medication within 24 hours it could be fatal. I mean he said that yesterday she was taken Saturday night we believe overnight Saturday into Sunday. Um and now here we are Tuesday. He issued a direct plea to whomever may be holding her.

3:16 What would you say to someone who if they're holding Nancy Guthrie right now? What's your message to them?

3:21 Just call us. Let her go. Just call us. We u family would tell you there's no questions asked here. Look, if she's alive right now, the the her meds are vital. I can't stress that enough. You know, it's been better than 24 hours. And the family tells us if she doesn't have those meds, it can become fatal. Today's show host Savannah Guthrie posted on Instagram last night asking for prayers for her mother's safe return, writing, quote, "We believe in prayer. We believe in voices raised in unison, in love, in hope. We believe in goodness. We believe in humanity. Above all, we believe in him. We need you.

4:07 Bring her home." We are expecting a press conference from local authorities to take place at 1:30 p.m. Eastern today. And just of note before I bring in my panel, um, you heard the sheriff starting to sound a bit more dire now in in the way he's talking about this. That was my impression, too. He did a lengthy interview with Ashley Banfield on her podcast yesterday, Drop Dead serious. And um, he actually used the word dead. He didn't say she's dead, but he used it in a way that was kind of jarring and gave you a bit of a window perhaps into what his uh, worries are, what he's thinking.

4:46 maybe even what his opinion is. I don't know. Here's S three. We also know we have to be careful. I mean, we hope that, you know, it's happened before. The police is the sheriff is, "Oh, we this person's dead and this that and that." And the next thing, you know, some hospital calls, says, "Hey, I think I've got this lady in my hospital room." So, you know, we're never going to give up hope. We That's why you guys are so critical to us. Somebody out there sees something, says maybe they'll see her. We've gotten calls like that. Hey, I think I saw her in Flagstaff. Hey, I think I saw her here. And so, we'll chase those leads down.

5:24 That was pretty interesting where he he's basically saying he doesn't want to say anything about her being dead until he knows for sure. But to me, that sounded an awful lot like somebody who thinks the outcome right now is not good. Um, it's unconfirmed. Obviously, he doesn't know, but he's seen the inside of the house in a way that none of us has, and he knows a lot more than he's saying. In fact, he's been, you know, clearly somebody and likely him because he's been the spokesperson for the office told NBC about that blood and uh the LA Times and Fox News has it too about the blood droplets. Uh but then sort of tried to walk it back, saying, "If I were asked that by NBC now, I wouldn't confirm it." Well, okay. He's he seems like a very nice guy, but his messaging has been a little inconsistent from place to place. Um, it seems clear that there was blood inside the house, that it was hers, and that it led a

6:17 trail right outside of the house, which is more than likely how they determined this is a crime scene, and this was not somebody who walked off of her own valition. Again, we're going to be having a presser in about an hour and a half, and we will bring you all the latest news from that as it unfolds. Joining me now in the meantime, James Fitzgerald, former FBI supervisory special agent and criminal profiler and host of the Code Red podcast and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Lieutenant Randy Sutton. He's also founder of the Wounded Blue. Don't miss a moment.

6:49 Subscribe to this show on YouTube and follow me on Insta, Facebook, and X. These are not the meat sticks you grew up with. This is Paleo Valley. Made with 100% grass-fed beef from small-scale regenerative American family farms. Paleo Valley lets you feel good about what you are eating and who you are supporting. In fact, Paleo Valley is one of the few companies that sources 100% of its meat from American farms right here in the US. Real ingredients, real results. No preservatives, no gluten, soy, refined sugar, dairy, or GMOs.

7:21 Whether you are road tripping, working late, hitting the gym, or just need a quick pickme up, these beef sticks are for you. High protein, low guilt, no crash keto paleo carnivore whatever your lifestyle, Paleo Valley could work with it, not against it. And the flavors original jalapeno summer sausage, teriyak, and more. Over 55 million sticks sold, backed by a 60-day money back guarantee. Support small American farms with regenerative agriculture. With Paleo Valley, you are not just snacking, you are making a statement. Right now, you can get 20% off your first order at paleo valley.com with code Megan.

7:59 Jim, Randy, welcome to you both. Um, what do you make of what we've heard so far? Randy, I'll start with you. Your thoughts?

8:07 Sure thing. So, uh, I watched the presser yesterday. Uh, I've been following this case since since it became public. And you're you're right in your characterization of the way the sheriff has communicated uh the issues of this case there are a little disjointed but clearly they are um they are taking this really really seriously. They did call in the homicide section. That was very telling in and of itself. Um they did uh say that there was blood evidence and that there that they were treating it like a crime scene. They had the the search and rescue team out there. They were doing physical uh search of the area with with uh uh people on foot using their drones using their fixed wing aircraft, their helicopters. They did mention that they use they were using their forward-looking infrared which would have a heat signature should they find someone walking or uh or someone laying down somewhere in the area and all of

9:06 that proved negative. that would be an indication that this uh that that Miss Guthrie was taken somewhere and is now not around that area because they did a pretty thorough search. This is very very troubling. Remember, stranger abductions are very very rare. So, um there's going to be a this is a a massive investigation and there's going to be a lot at play here. The Daily Mail just as we came to air actually citing um Fox News for this reporting that Miss Guthy's pacemaker stopped syncing with her Apple Watch in the early hours of Sunday morning around 2:00 a.m. going from Saturday into Sunday. What they said was um investigators told the outlet that NY's Apple Watch was left inside of her home.

9:55 They write which likely means the device stopped sinking. the device is her pacemaker and the Apple Watch stopped syncing when the pacemaker was out of range from the watch. So, it doesn't mean she died. It means she with her pacemaker was taken too far away from the Apple Watch for it to sink any longer. And that happened around 2 a.m. which would be a very good investigative um piece of information. Jim,

10:20 yeah, I've worked a few case even few cases even in retirement of homicides with these Apple watches or similar watches if they're found on the victim or certainly through uh through the technology through the cloud whatever they can really help determine uh not only movement and locations but also uh time of death. I suppose it makes uh you know forensic pathologist jobs a little bit easier in that way in terms of determining that. But to go back to the sheriff uh uh and many times in the FBI when we were working these real-time cases we would be as a profiler we would be consulting with uh the spokespersons for different departments and we would not tell them what to say of course but we would certainly guide them and do certain uh uh uh language usages and especially as a linguist I determined even better along the years how to do this and you don't want to be inflammatory you don't want to be overly

11:10 accusatory you want to almost make it sound like Look, maybe someone made a mistake here. One or more people and just, you know, drop the person off, leave them go. Sometimes as kids, as you would know, Megan, or teenagers, it's not too often we get 84 year old people like this. The blood is not a good sign either, whether it was art arterial bleeding, meaning it's much more serious or not. So far, we just have drops. So, uh, she's obviously in some level of danger, but hopefully the people who are in fact have her in custody taking care of her know this and are keeping her alive. Um, and I'll add to your too, Megan, that uh there whoever is has done this are listening to us, I don't mean us personally at this very moment, but they are following the media on this. If you have even a a modeicum of sophistication to you when committing these types of crimes, uh you're going to be following the media to find out

12:01 what they know and get everything uh possible to help protect yourself and and carry out the crime. and let's hope that's all they want to do is carry out the crime, get some money, and and and perhaps move on from there and not harm her. Um Randy, what what do you make of the fact that yesterday the sheriff um started off with a presser in the morning where he offered some detail and then as the day went on seemed to be amping up his his messaging around this using the word kidnapping, using the word taken, abducted and um obviously I mean I think it was him who who leaked the stuff about the blood to the LA Times and and possibly Fox because he's been the main spokesperson. I'm I'm just assuming. I could be wrong. Uh but in any event, we saw more and more of him. I mean, I saw him everywhere. He was on CBS. He was on ABC. He was on NBC. He was uh on Fox. He was with Ashley Banfield. He was with

12:53 some other podcasts. Like, clearly, he made the decision to try to get out anywhere and everywhere that asked for him.

13:00 Yeah. and and the terms that he used did escalate from uh he was he was couching his terms a little bit more um diplomatically during his press conference, but uh as the day went on, there were more and more details that leaked out. Um

13:18 so why why to tell you the truth? Um I don't know why. I I I I I can't even begin to guess other than um in in watching his his uh press and his interviews. Um he's not he's not a very polished individual when it comes down to communicating u what he should be communicating to the public reference this reference this uh crime. Um, I I'm I'm hesitant to be too critical of him, but um I've seen much more professional uh you know, individuals be giving out information when it comes down to a serious issue like this. I I I mean I would imagine if what they really need is press coverage, which clearly they've made a decision they need press coverage, um it won't be long now before we hear from Savannah because if there's one person involved in this case who can get the media to run a sound bite on every single television station there is and to be quoted in all the newspapers, it's Savannah Guthrie.

14:27 Um, but what a terrible position for her to have to be in to, you know, have to come out in front of the cameras and make a comment right now when she doesn't know what's happened to her mother. I my heart goes out to her. Um, Jim, how do you even begin to to come up with a profile of who would potentially steal an 84 year old woman?

14:51 Well, uh, we always start with victimology. What do we know about our victim? This is a low-risk victim, probably as low as you can get in terms of her everyday activities, her behavior and even the environment in which she lives, where she travels and and of course her physical uh you know condition which is not the best in terms of uh mobility etc. So we want to find out everything about her in that regard and of course expanding that it's everyone she knows of course family friends interview all of them go through emails text messaging such as that but then to then really hone in on uh who who have been guests in her house in the last month plus obviously family and friends we'll know about those what kind of repairmen what kind of medical people what kind of delivery people uh salesmen just randomly knocking on doors and and Even those people, you know, maybe plumbers or heater uh HVAC guys, they

15:45 may not be uh they may be legitimate and have nothing to do with this, but they have friends and they and those friends talk to friends. So, that sort of all has to be worked out exponentially to find out everyone who's been in or near that house. These people didn't wake up at uh you know at noon on Saturday and say, "Let's go out and kidnap Mrs. Guthrie." I'm saying these people, even though she's an older woman, you'd probably want someone to back you up, drive the van, the car, SUV, whatever, and then have someone else go in. They could have, was it forced entry? It seems like it was breaking a window or something. Or a little woman, you know, a younger woman knocking on the door.

16:19 Oh, my car broke down and they tricked her into opening the door. Another part of victimology. What kind of uh risk uh averse person is she? Would she open the door for a stranger? These are thing her family and friends can tell. So that's what we first want to do uh to find out everything about her all her goings on for the last month or so uh emails social media all those type things who she' been in contact with and all those people have to be interviewed and friends of those people and to see possibly a linkage to this I I won't say these are criminal masterminds who undertook this but they at least got away with this so far and they did some practice some surveillance and we got to look at technology for not just that weekend but going back a week before. No doubt they cased her house. They surveiled it to make sure they knew what neighbors were doing, who's on the streets, and uh and that technology may

17:09 give some clues to that in to who did this also. And just to let the audience know, uh the sheriff had told one outlet that she was snatched from her bed uh in the middle of the night and then he took that back too, saying he didn't mean to say that. So, like I I feel for the sheriff. you know, this is he's been thrust into the national spotlight in a way he didn't anticipate. But you you do have to give him like a day or two to find out whether he's going to stick with the message that he delivered at the presser or in these interviews. But I again, he's just trying to get the word out and get attention drawn to this. So, we don't right now know whether she was snatched from her bed or whether it was the scenario like you just outlined, Jim, where maybe they rang the doorbell and she came down and they grabbed her. I mean, what we do know, Randy, is that they the sheriff said she cannot walk more than 50 yards

17:56 herself. Like, she's infirm physically, but not mentally at all. And that would mean that somebody would have to either take her or quote help her uh get out of the house uh and get into a car potentially. She saw we saw her with a cane on the set of the Today Show, so she clearly used a cane and I'm sure she was slowgoing. And they'd have to have pulled a car right up to that door, right? I mean, like, it's 2:00 a.m. They they would have had to pull the car. If they know this woman's on a cane and she can't move well and she's fighting, you know, she's at the point where she's potentially bleeding, don't you think they would have had to have a car right up there in her driveway?

18:38 Absolutely. And um there in one of in one of the reports and and you know as as this dripped and drabed uh information came out there was um a a mention of forced entry. That was one of the things that was said. And so I was hopeful that when when I heard that that and then the droplets of blood, I was really hopeful that those droplets of blood might belong to the suspect who might have cut themselves when breaking a window or something like that. um that that hope has been dashed because they did confirm that that DNA uh belonged to the victim here. So, unfortunately,

19:16 but what what about touch DNA, Randy? Because, you know, it's like now we've got touch DNA. That's what caught Brian Coberger.

19:21 Well, for sure. And you can bet that and this is one of the be beautiful things about the cooperation with the FBI. um they are unparalleled with their forensic abilities and uh and seeing that they were called into the scene uh early on that they have tremendous assets at their disposal. So um they they but it takes time for that DNA uh evidence to to surface and then then of course you know DNA databases

19:49 aren't aren't you know it's not like the fingerprint database where everybody that's been arrested has has DNA out there. So, um, it is

19:57 well and on top of that, if it's we have to factor in the possibility that this is somebody from Mexico since it's only, you know, an hour away from the southern border and would we have, you know, if it's not an American potentially, would we have DNA um, in the way we do for most Americans linked at least, you know, maybe 10 times removed, but most of us are in there now thanks to some distant relative who's gone to these DNA data databases and given their blood. We just, we don't know. But Jim, that's an interesting question about DNA and the FBI's help. And also, we know, it's been reported that the FBI's using its cell phone towers, uh, its triangulation. You know, how it can check the towers to see what phones were in the area at a certain time. So, now the 2 a.m. info is very helpful. And unlike the three of us, the FBI almost certainly has NY's actual phone and they can see what time

20:51 she put it down. They can tell what time you went to bed. They can tell certainly what time you stopped texting people, what time you went offline on it. Um, so if they can probably put the time to within maybe even, you know, a couple minutes of when she got taken and then they use those cell phone towers to see which phones may have been in the area. I mean that ultimately that's how they caught the DC pipe bomber or so they tell us. What do you make of those potential leads?

21:16 Oh, sure. All of that is very important and I assure you as Randy was saying there's a task force already assembled in the Tucson area of multiple agencies. I know Border Patrol is involved. Uh certainly FBI, Tucson Police, Sheriff's Department, and no doubt the state police. And they're all working together on this. And I I know I don't know for a fact, but I can I can tell you that uh uh people from Quantico, the FBI laboratory are there in position now, and they're running through all these aspects you just described. Don't forget all the surveillance cameras up and down the streets of Tucson. U tag recognition software, facial recognition software, and again, not just that night. They're going to have to, you know, grab it, of course, for that night, everything they can for those few hours before and after, you know, 2 am, but they want to go back before that.

22:03 Would the fact that it might have been done at 2 a.m. be helpful because there's going to be less traffic, fewer license plates to read and try to identify on the highway, right around, you know what I mean? Like, is that is that a good thing that that it's been limited to a low traffic hour?

22:18 Well, sure. And I mean, the the benefit to the bad guys is that it's dark under the cover of darkness, all that. they can get away with it. The bad news from a forensic and technology perspective is there's going to be fewer people out there to in fact uh you know correlate uh or collate the different tags that are running back and forth uh and going you know in whatever direction and this will be expanded by 50 miles to 100 miles in concentric circles which would take us right to that Mexican border. And by the way, these kidnappings, as as Randy said earlier, they don't happen in the US, they're very, very rare. They do happen a lot in Mexico, Latin America, and South America. They know Mrs.

22:55 Guthri's the daughter of a uh very uh I'm sorry, the mother of a very uh you know, wealthy woman newscaster and uh and they know this is a prime target and and I'm just wondering if there's been a ransom demand on already, but that's not being released. And we, you know, some criticism perhaps dustified of the sheriff, but maybe they're sitting on something that we I'm sure they're sitting on a lot we don't know. Is it possible there's a ransom demand? If there's no ransom demand, then what's the purpose of this? Some kind of a revenge or uh uh something? And I I six weeks ago we had the Brown University shooting and the MIT shooting that goes back 25 years and a whole continent apart. So, if there's no money demand, then what's the what's the motivation behind this? And I'm sure that's what the police and law enforcement are struggling with right now. Motivation will be nice to know for money or for

23:43 reb. The sheriff said no. He said no to ransom. And he said no in a way that I believed. He was like that's just we haven't heard anything about that yet. No. No ransom demand.

23:52 Unless they insisted. He doesn't unless they insisted. He doesn't say that publicly.

23:57 That's right. He could be could be misleading for everyone's protection. Uh but what for whatever it's worth on the record he denied that there had been a ransom demand. But you tell me, Randy, I I there's just no way in my lay person's view they didn't take her because she's related to Savannah Guthrie. I mean, what are the odds that this is just some caper where they've kidnapped an 84 year old woman who just so happens to be the mother of one of the biggest news stars in America? Like that just that does not track to me. Well, in law enforcement, we don't believe in coincidences, and I don't believe in that coincidence either. You're absolutely right. Here is very high-profile. Um, you know, her daughter's very, very high profile, and and you know, uh, Jim was talking about victimology, highly critically important in in this type of investigation. But the victimology is going to have to now

24:51 expand to include the daughter because they're going to be looking into any threats um any any type of um uh past uh occurrences that might lead to some type of of grudge. uh you know you know there there's there's people out there in the world and you and I both know that they they aren't playing with a full deck and um and and there there are people that that um you know uh concentrate on on a on an individual and they become um you know so incredibly attuned to them that they they view themselves as being uh related to them or a love interest or anything like that. So, all of this has to be looked at. You can't you can't discount anything here. And that's what makes this such a a a very very difficult investigation. And it's it's going to require um all of the resources at play here. And I and I just as the time ticks by here, Megan, I'm I'm really concerned. As time ticks by, the chances of survival are diminishing uh

26:02 literally by the hour. I I'm just trying to figure out, you know, why why would you do this? You know, Jim, I'm I'm thinking in We talked to Matt Murphy, uh longtime federal prosecutor yesterday, and he was saying, you know, forgive me, but don't rule out a possible sex crime because he's prosecuted cases uh where 79year-old women were raped and and attacked and and so sadly that made some sense. But one would think that if that were to happen, she would have been left there or if she'd been killed afterward that she'd be left there. I don't know. Um it's strange that they took her like they they clearly took her and I suppose you could make the case that if they killed her in the house, forgive me for this kind of speculation, but we're all wondering what happened. that that also could explain the pacemaker no longer communicating with the Apple Watch at 2 a.m. You know, that's the other

27:05 possibility of why the the the sinking stopped. Well, this was a high-risisk crime to go to the door, grab the woman, and do anything with her. Uh it it it increases 100fold by putting her in a car and driving away with her. So much can go wrong after that. You cross the line or one of your tail lights is out, a police officer could stop you and you have all kinds of issues. Now, whether she's in the trunk, she has duct tape around her, you know, I'm just speculating here also. We don't know. Um, but the the reason to be fine, and I agree with Randy, this is not coincidence. They knew she was the daughter of this uh this prominent news person in the US, worth worth some money. I'm sorry, the mother uh uh and her daughter was of course the newscaster. And and and and if if money is not a factor, then it has to go back to some personal issue. And there has been research done over the years. Of course, there are some men out

27:58 there who get kicked out of sex uh with much older women, and the research was the older the women uh the younger the offender. So, we have her at 84. What does that say about this case? But there may be so much more involved here. We're not going to lock into someone in their teens or early 20s necessarily because of that research. U but uh nothing can be ruled out at this point. Uh, I would urge if the person is listening to us out there, you make it look like this is so random and meaningless. You must have a meaning. You must have a purpose for doing this. Let the authorities know.

28:30 Put something out there somehow. And uh, and hopefully give us a proof of life that this woman is alive. She doesn't deserve to be killed. She didn't do anything to you. I can assure.

28:40 Do you know, Jim, is they brought dogs in. All sorts of dogs. And I'm I'm just assuming they brought both rescue dogs, you know, blood hounds and also cadaavver dogs. But would a cadaavver dog get a hit if a person had only been dead in the house for a half an hour? I I think and and and Randy could perhaps discuss this too, but cadaavver dogs are so well trained uh and and they have such an expertise. I mean, and there's some dogs even better than others, but I think they could pick up the scent whether recently dead, dead in the house or or or, you know, down the line somewhere, but I I believe a dog, a cadaavver dog, well trained with a proper, you know, u master, if you will, or or trainer, uh, they would find the remains if they're somewhere in the area. Maybe it's a good sign. So far, Randy, the the the one thing from that sheriff is he he's not talking like she was killed in the house. She he's he he

29:35 clearly doesn't know whether she's alive or dead right now, but he's not talking like he thinks she was killed in the house. He did bring in homicide detectives right away, but like there's an urgency to him and him covering the field with the press yesterday afternoon suggests he he thinks there's still time to save her.

29:50 Yeah. And that is u that's all correlation to what they found at the crime scene. Now remember very early on they did they did uh couch this as a crime scene and they talked about droplets of blood you know later on um when when a body when a killing take place a murder takes place it is it is uh it is very messy okay you know uh whether it's from blunt uh you know trauma for you know hitting someone with an object if it's a stabbing if it's a shooting it is um It leaves it leaves a lot of evidence around. And so when he talks about that it was a crime scene and that they found evidence and especially the droplets, that indicates to me that um that there was not a major crime scene found here, that there was not um a pool of blood, if you will, or or tissue or things like that. And that would be that would I mean if you look at all the different ways that that um that a a body can lose you know its

30:56 life. It's from it's it's from blunt uh trauma. It's from gunshots. It's from stabbings. It's from strangulation. But um but generally it's going to leave it's going to leave a lot of forensic evidence behind. And there's been no indication that there was a major scene found here. Uh, I think I think that probably would have been something that that would have been uh that would have been told

31:21 and then it would have changed the way the sheriff sounds when he's when he's talking. You know, Jim, the um there's a possibility that they did kidnap and alive Nancy Guthrie and that she did pass after the kidnapping. I mean, good God, I think about my own mom who's the same age and I don't know if my mom could handle that, you know, like I don't know if her heart could handle that that sort of trauma. And poor Nancy Guthrie had the pacemaker, was on some sort of medication that they said she needs every 24 hours or it could be fatal. And I guess that's a possibility that could explain why we haven't had a ransom.

32:02 Well, a few things here, Megan, and and good points. uh the the minimal blood and it's it's too much of course for anyone, but the minimal blood at the scene could have been used a a a form of uh control early on. Slap across the face, punch to the nose, and that's where that blood came from just to get her to cooperate or get her limp and bring her out to the car. And I hate to be this graphic, but let me go back uh in time to when I was an FBI agent in New York City. Right across the river was the Exxon executive uh who was kidnapped uh from right outside of his door. That was 1992. His name was Sydney Russo and a high ranking Exxon executive. And it turns out he was put in a box, taken away back of a van, then eventually put in a box, put in the Pine Barons. He died, but the husband and wife team still carried through on the attempt to get the ransom and eventually within a few days to a week, they were

32:54 identified and arrested, and they took uh they took FBI agents to the body. So I I and I I don't want to make this predictive or is something that we know it's going to happen in this particular case, but with older people, uh the stress and the strain of a forced kidnapping, I mean, think about it. Your mother yourself, I mean, how would you handle this? A, you know, even above 50 years of age, uh, it could be very, very traumatic. And, and if you already have pre-existing medical conditions, pacemaker, as she does, you're not getting the meds, it only exacerbates all the problems that can go wrong. Um, but there have been, my point is here, there have been kidnapped victims who have died and the kidnappers said, "Well, you know, we did what we did. Uh, we still want to get the money." Of course, I'm hoping they would, the family would ask for a proof of life.

33:41 The old days, they would hold a newspaper up with the current headline to show that they're alive. Uh, nowadays with technology, you can do it different ways, but there's also AI, which can make them look like they're alive and they're not. So, uh, that part gets kind of iffy. So, I I'm just hoping I'm going to be positive here that she's alive and the kidnappers just finding a way to either release her, get the money for her, then release her and go from there.

34:03 But does it since we're all on the same page that none of us here thinks that this was coincidental that, you know, it just so happened they they targeted an 84year-old who was Savannah Guthri's mom. Um, it does make it so it back to your theory. It's so it's either for money potentially or to punish her for a report potentially. This is raw speculation with no support, but possibly there was some report she did. I'm sure the FBI is combing through all of her recent reporting for, you know, the Today Show, any in-depth interview she did. And I I would imagine they're looking at all of that. But I also wonder like you tell me, wouldn't somebody that high-profile be a huge risk for kidnappers, even south of the border kidnappers where it's more frequent? Like, you got to know if you go for a woman like that, it's going to be on every television station in the country and the heat is going to be

35:03 really, really high, which I feel like would be a deterrent. like maybe that's an argument against them knowing who this was. Either of you guys have thoughts on that?

35:13 Yeah, I I agree with you. Um when you look at at the uh high-profile nature of this, uh you know, I I would venture to guess that uh most of America is now aware of this situation and they're not operating in a vacuum, right? They they have a landlord, whoever took this, whoever took this one, they don't live in a vacuum. They they have a life. They have uh relatives. They have friends. Uh they have business associates. They they have uh they have an area that they need to cover. Um so it it's really it's really um worrisome that that they have taken this this uh uh action.

35:57 Megan, if I may add, what do you think, Jim? Willie Sutton used to say who's asked, "Why do you rob banks?" Well, that's where the money is. Uh so why would someone kidnap a high-profile person or their heir or or whatever? And that's because that's the best chance of getting money. Look, Patty Hurst, that was a political kidnapping in the early 70s, but they knew the Hurst family had tons of money. Frank Sinatra Jr. was kidnapped the early 60s. That was a high-profile person. there was an heir to the Kors u brewery uh company I believe late 50s early 60s kidnapped he was eventually found dead uh so and this happens across you know Europe and and South America all the time a lot of soccer players or football players in other countries they come from you know Ecuador, Brazil, wherever and the kidnappings occur there even though they're making their money elsewhere. So uh it's it's high risk.

36:50 You're right about that, Megan. But it's also high reward because as Willie Sutton said, that's where the money is. So they think it's worth a shot here. We don't know this is a kidnapping for profit yet. They're very, very rare in the US, but 65 miles from the Mexican border, it certainly can't be ruled out, but where's that ransom note or ransom demand that we're waiting to hear about?

37:10 And like cartels, you know, we've been ramping up our efforts against them. you know, it's not it's not Mexico, it's America, it's it's Tucson, Arizona, but it's very close. And, you know, you got to factor in what's happening down there. Speaking of possible politics, uh, the White House just put out a post on X about it that reads as follows. The search for Savannah Guthri's mother, Nancy Guthrie, is ongoing and authorities are requesting assistance from the public. Anyone with information is urged to contact 911. Our prayers are with the Guthrie family as we hope for NY's safe return home. and they posted the picture of her. If you have information, call 911. Pointing out this is what she looks like. She's uh 5'5.

37:54 She weighs 150 lbs. Uh blue eyes, brown hair. Last seen January um 31st. And then this just also in hold on um Brian Enton who works for News Nation just posted a video from NY's home. Uh he's saying the first thing he noticed coming out there is how incredibly remote the area is. that everyone lives on an acre or more. There are no street lights. He was out there last last night. It was very dark. And we were also told that this is an a neighborhood with like mostly elderly people reportedly, Randy, that you know, it's one of those sleepy retirement communities from the sound of it, this particular area where she lived. But with a house that's a million dollars that's got acorage around it, we've seen the aerials. It clearly had some grounds. You're going to have to have groundskeepers. You're gonna have to have most likely a maid or a maid service that comes in, you're probably going to have somebody who comes in and

38:50 helps you with your meals, you know? I mean, if Savannah was taking care of her mom in any way close to the way I take care of mom, my mom, I'm sure she had all of those things, you know, because she's both of our moms were widowed at very young ages and didn't have a husband to do any of that. And even an 84 year old husband is not totally capable of doing all that. So would you imagine that's where they're going to start? Not to blame the staff, but look, the odds are come that close to Mexico, you're going to have a fair amount of people who are volunteering for those roles. And I I don't know, I feel like if I were a cop, that's where I'd start.

39:26 There's absolutely no doubt that that is paramount in the investigative process here. And um I I I spoke to a law enforcement officer yesterday who has uh jurisdiction down there just telling me about this about the area and uh yeah exceedingly dark. There's not a street light anywhere near um these it's a it's a hilly area. Um if you're if you're even going out for a walk um then you're going to be you're going to be straining. So yeah, it the the the surrounding area is uh would be inhospitable for any length of walking.

40:04 That's why when Jim talked about a vehicle being utilized at the outset, um there's absolutely no doubt that that was that that was a mode of transportation and that is that will play a key role here. But you you did uh hone in on something critically important and that is um the the people who work there who would be most familiar with the property who would be most familiar with the actions and the scheduling of uh of of the victim here. So yeah, they will not only look at them but they will look at everyone that they know because remember um the the uh uh nothing happens in a vacuum. There's there's there's uh you know conversations that take place between friends and relatives. So you can bet that the landscapers that the maid whoever was working over there and just like Jim said earlier was was a plumber there uh earlier in the week. Every one of these people has to be vetted and they're going to they're going to have

41:01 to undergo uh some serious questioning. I mean, I was thinking about it because like again, if her mom's anything like my mom, she was shouting from the rooftops about her well-known daughter. I mean, I was kid. My mom when I go home to visit her, we'll go out to eat and she'll say, "Stand up so people can see who you are." She loves it. It's like, you know, it's vicarious, you know, and affection and she enjoys telling people that, but it can be potentially dangerous. And I'm sure that Nancy Guthrie had pictures of Savannah all over her home, so she wouldn't even have to shout it from the rooftops for somebody who had been in there as a service personnel, as as you know, a temporary worker, what have you. And that's another form of exposure. Um I I don't I I don't know. I just feel like what kind of a plan is that? I I listened to Ashley Banfield talk to the sheriff yesterday. She asked a lot of

41:56 good questions, Jim. She asked, "Were there any footprints that were recovered like outside?" You know, if there were gravel or some sort of sand, nothing. He said the driveway was not that kind of driveway. And so, he clearly does think they used the driveway. Um, nothing. No footprint, blood, nothing like that. She asked about the cameras. He said he actually I think he said there were not cameras inside, but there were outside. And then there was a report today that they had he when he talked to Ashley he said I'm I'm hoping that we can find the data on the cloud but if not then from the manufacturer like the service provider and then today it hit that there is no cloud database for these cameras. So now they're dependent on whoever maintains the cameras. And I suppose we also have to wonder whether the cameras were on and operational and not just for show or the contract lapsed. You know, there's also just

42:52 because there's a camera doesn't mean it was on. But how long would that take? Right? It's like what's the point of having the security camera if they can't get back to you with what happened in your driveway at 2 am on Saturday morning? You know, if if they can't do that within a day or two, if you got to wait a month, forget it.

43:12 Yeah. I mean, lesson learned here. For a $99 investment and $99 a year subscription, get get a security system. Whether you're wealthy or your your your daughter's wealthy and famous or not, you know, that that's an idea for everyone out there. Uh, and look, it's very likely, again, I'm not going to paint whoever took Mrs. Guthrie as a criminal mastermind, one or more people, but they probably had enough common sense. uh to know whether in advance whether there was a camera system or not because that would be a dead giveaway.

43:40 Uh they know the police the first thing they would look at is the ring camera, a blink camera, whatever it is and and try to get information off of that. So they either knew how to disable that or they knew in advance it wasn't operational or perhaps they in advance they they they they disabled the system there. So because so far we're not getting any breaks there. I think it's going to come down to other cameras, uh, you know, from other neighbors houses, even down the street. There had to be an ingress and egress to that property, east, west, north, south, whatever direction it is.

44:11 Whether they came back the same way they went, of course, we don't know, but every single camera system along that way has to be looked at. And and Megan, you said very early on in our talk today that, you know, at 2 a.m. I don't know what time the bars closed in that area, but I mean, you will think the roads are a lot less crowded at 2 a.m. on a Sunday morning than certainly 2:00 p.m. on a on a Saturday afternoon. So, that could be an advantage also. So, it may be technology. Uh, it may be DNA. We didn't talk about fingerprints. They probably wore gloves to the scene, uh, which would have prohibited those being left behind. But other forensic evidence of old school kind, forensic kind, as well as technology are hopefully going to put this together and they're going to take every path they can from that house in any direction and look at cameras in that regard and see who they can find

44:56 that may somehow become the suspect. License plate readers, the those license plate readers, that's like only on the highways. I mean, that's are they not You tell me. I mean, how how are they going to be helpful?

45:10 Well, police cars have them, too. and uh and they can pick up tags and they can look at them, retrieve them and archive them for days, weeks afterwards depending on the department. So there are always yeah it's going to be a herculean task and I I tell you whether because she's a famous the mother of a famous person or not that can be a whole different discussion but there is going to be a large task force here we're we're at least at dozens of people now maybe approaching a hundred uh bringing people in from all over the country certainly of the federal level to help out on this case and they're going to be uh just like with the Boston bomber back in 2012 I think it was you know all the uh video they were going through then they eventually found the two brothers and and these fing and and with uh the Idaho killer, they made a car stop on him uh uh somewhere in the Midwest when he was driving back with his father.

45:57 That was a plate recognition software that got him at least pulled over then. So, that will be put to use. It's being put to use right now 24/7 and hopefully they're going to get a break in that regard. Someone is where they shouldn't be.

46:09 Plus the cell phone, throw in cell phone information and uh the towers and that's going to help. I mean, I I'll guarantee you the NSA knew almost immediately who was in that area at 2 am. Like, the NSA has got those records time after time. We're told uh in a way that's very helpful. And but this is not helpful, guys. This just crossing my desk from the Daily Mail. Quote, "A doorbell camera Nancy owned was removed by the time investigators arrived on Sunday." Now, that's very odd wording. I don't know whether that means they think the bad guys took out the camera, right?

46:47 Like I mean that would certainly track with what they're saying, Randy, evidence of foul play. Um including they they've said like around the door like around they think there was a breaking and entering, you know. So like it's poss if this person actually knew enough to go like take out the Ring camera or the Nest camera before they went in there, that's I don't know. Is that sophisticated or isn't it? Does everybody What do you think every crook would know how to do that?

47:14 Well, with the advent of of these security cameras um you know for years now they're they're so common place. It is not an unusual set of circumstances for a crook to know about uh how to disable those cameras. It really is not difficult. So, but but it does show the nefariousness of this uh that uh that that it's interesting that it's coming out now that that ring camera was uh removed, not just disabled, it was removed. And uh the question that of course I have is is that um because the sheriff mentioned something about a search warrant yesterday uh when when he when he was referring to the security footage. Um, you know, I I'm not familiar enough with with the Ring camera uh to know whether that that information was uh you know, centralized somewhere within the Ring system. I know that uh uh you know, to access it from from your device, your you know, generally speaking, it's your phone. Um

48:16 you know, that you can go back and you can see but what took place. So that's a but that's a critical component now that that's been released that it just brings more and more attention to the fact that this was a planned um abduction and this this was not this was not a crime of passion. This was something that was planned that was um you know that was and and I agree with Jim too. I don't think it's one person and uh but here here's where where that that plays a role. Um, you know, we all know that if you want to keep a secret, uh, you got to kill the other person, right? So, the fact that we believe that there is more than one person involved could lead to, um a you know, an ability to solve this through, um, through some information that might surface from, um, from that somebody talks.

49:10 Exactly. Or makes a mistake. This just in on what to expect at 1:30. uh per spokesperson at the presser later this morning, Sheriff Nanos is expected to talk about some of the evidence recovered at the Guthrie home to clarify what steps are being taken in the investigation and to address information regarding a potential vehicle of interest.

49:32 Let's hope they actually have one. Guys, thank you both so much, Jim and Randy. All the best. Really appreciate it.

49:37 You're welcome. Thanks for having us, Megan. Wow. Um, and if you have any information, any any whatsoever, even if you don't think it's relevant, uh, call 911. That's easiest. I'll tell you, I I called yesterday. I I thought I had some information that might be relevant. Probably not, but like just don't be the person who keeps it to themselves. Let the law enforcement officials figure out whether it's relevant. Uh, coming up, we turn to politics with Rich Lowry and Charlie Cook from National Review. How are you showing a little extra love this February? Whether it's for someone special or just for you, for many, it starts at home with Cozy Earth. Their bamboo pajama set is a classic Cozy Earth favorite and the sleepwware upgrade you will love slipping into night after night. They're lightweight yet cozy and unbelievably soft. Fall asleep faster, stay comfortable longer, and honestly, look forward to putting

50:30 these things on every night. This Valentine's Day season, Cozy Earth is offering a buy one get one or BOGO pajama deal you won't see any other time of the year. And it's totally risk-f free. You see, you get a 100 night sleep trial, so you can really try them out, plus a 10-year warranty. If you don't like them after 100 nights, you send them back in and get a refund. These viral PJs are so good, they sold out during the holidays. And now they're back with an exclusive deal only available through February 8th. Hurry up. Head to cozyearth.com. Use my code Megan Bogo to get these PJs for you and someone you love. And if you get a post-purchase survey, be sure to tell them that you heard about Cozy Earth right here on the MK show. Celebrate everyday love with comfort that makes the little moments count. I want to tell you big news. Tomorrow we will be heading down to Washington DC for an interview with Vice President JD Vance.

51:23 It will be our first sitdown with him since 2024 during the campaign. There's a lot to discuss and we're very excited to bring that to you tomorrow. We're going to try to get it on the air during the 12 to2 live SiriusXM show, but you know how these things go. That may or may not be possible, but we'll definitely will release it on YouTube and via Pod tomorrow. Anyway, stay tuned. We are going to aim to get it uh on during our live slot on SiriusXM. So, uh that ought to be fun. Why don't you send me an email if you've got something that you want me to ask the vice president? It's Megan Kelly.com. Um, so much more news to get to before we do that. Uh, Don Lemon went on Jimmy Kimmel last night and played the victim. And the ladies of the View are speaking out about this case, too, giving their brilliant legal analysis as always because of course you ask yourself, well, but what does Anna Navaro think

52:19 when you look at any complex legal case? I know that's that's what Rich and Charlie do. They're here. It's an NR day. Rich Lowry is here. He's editor-inchief of National Review and Charles CW Cook, senior writer for National Review and host of the Charles CW Cook podcast. Find all of their work by becoming an NR Plus subscriber. Highly recommend. I am. And I subscribe to the all all of it, the the the paper magazine and NR Plus online profiles. And it gets rid of almost all the ads and it's wonderful. Guys, great to see you. Charles, did you or did you not text Rich this morning or the morning of Don Lemon's arrest and say, "What does Anna Navaro think?"

53:00 Well, I didn't because it's just an assumption between us at this point that we wait for her take and then we both echo it and usually incorporate it into National Reviews editorial line.

53:13 If only someday you could actually get her. Um, so you didn't have to go through this pins and needles would be a lot a lot easier. I don't think Charlie or I know what she said. So, we we we need to know. We're going to come down on this issue. We need to hear the clip.

53:27 I got you covered, Rich. Who Who looks after you better than I do? Uh she went on the View and she discussed the grand jury indictment of Don. And um this was her take in s 21B.

53:40 He was at that protest like a a week ago, right, in the church. and and then a week later they sent

53:47 they got a grand jury to indict him to indict him. But this is this is after they had gone to three different courts trying to get

53:56 uh judges to sign off and the judges in all three previous cases said to the DOJ, "Get the hell out of my courtroom, you clowns. There is no case here." So they basically did it themselves. They did it. They released the news at the exact same time that they released the Epstein documents. So, make no mistake about it. This was about gaslighting. This was about going against Don Lemon and other journalists. By the way, all who happen to be black. Happy Black History Month. Uh, and it's I think it's, you know, to send a chilling message,

54:27 correct, to anybody who is covering facts. So, she's not a big fan of the Minnesota Grand Jury. She doesn't appear to believe in the sanctity of that organization or the indictment it handed down. That's not how she felt when President Trump was indicted, when he was a candidate. Just just for old times sake, let's take a look at 21C.

54:50 I want to thank this special grand jury because they have been meeting for weeks and weeks. They've done this incredibly seriously. These are not people with a political agenda. These are ne regular New Yorkers. Donald Trump finally v won a popular vote yesterday. The grand jury voted to indict him. So, there's a bit of an inconsistency there, Rich, but um for the record, she she doesn't think much of the grand jury and its indictment of Don Lemon. And um they appear to believe that it's a race thing on the set of The View.

55:25 Yeah. Well, they seem to think he was just picked up randomly walking down the street. And if you're being arrested just for being annoying and being Don Lemon, there would have been so many offenses prior to this where they could have gone to a grand jury and got some supposedly bogus indictment. He's was indicted because he has commit likely committed a crime. And whether he'll ultimately be convicted of this, I'm a little skeptical, but he was conspiring with these people. He knew about it beforehand. He was helping conceal it.

55:53 He went into the church. He was part of the disruption. He was asked by the pastor to leave. He didn't leave. at least not when requested by the pastor and those are the facts that led to this indictment. So I understand saying look I don't I I think journalists have a special status or he was a journalist in this instance and it's an ambiguous case and I don't think he should be indicted there there's some reasonable people to say that but say he was indicted because he's a black man or he's a Trump critic. No, he was indicted for what he did. And the First Amendment is not this this special badge you get to hold up as a member of the press that makes you immune from laws that are applicable to everyone else in the United States.

56:31 That's just not how it works. That's so that's exactly right. That's why it's so infuriating to hear these inane discussions, Charlie, because the three of us know if we said we're members of the press and therefore we can accompany this group storming an abortion clinic, we have a microphone and we have a little thing that says press pass and they are storming. They're chaining themselves to the door. They're blocking women from entering the surgery room and we're part of it. Like we're not chanting, we're not saying don't have an abortion, but we're right there. We're also looking at the women who are in the clinic and just by being there posing somewhat of an impediment to their exercise of what they want to do. Um, but we have a microphone. We said, "Well, I'm a member of the press.

57:14 I'm documenting this historic protest that they're doing inside of it. They're so brave. They're in here. This is what protest is all about to make people feel uncomfortable. Trauma is part of it. You crying lady over there. Does anybody think that the Joe Biden Department of Justice would have said, "Well, Charlie, Rich, and MK, you're members of the press, so we're not going to bother you."

57:37 No, I don't think so. I think one of the annoying parts of this, and I do think it will be close when it goes to trial. It's hard to convict people. It should be. There will be arguments advanced on both sides that might be persuasive to a jury. But I think the most annoying thing about this is that the defense of Don Lemon thus far has been to shout the First Amendment. And as you say, not only is it the case that that is not a blanket

58:07 warrant for anyone who considers himself to be connected to the press to get away with crimes, but the first amendment is on both sides of the ledger here. The reason the FACE act, at least the second part of it, which relates to churches, was passed,

58:24 was to deal with circumstances in which the first amendment rights of churchgoers are being violated by protesters, if you must call them that. These people went further than that. And the local government does nothing about it. in structure. This is the sort of postreonstruction or civil rights era law that in other circumstances Democrats like and in this case for good reason. You don't want a scenario in which people can storm into a religious service and stop it and intimidate the churchgoers and then the local government because it happens to approve of the cause says ah well we're not going to deal with it. The federal government in this case is acting to uphold the civil rights of those churchgoers. So if you're going to look at the first amendment in Don Lemon's case, that will be his defense that he was merely there as a journalist, you also have to look at it on the other side of the ledger. But the people who

59:16 are making this argument don't care about the other side of the ledger. They don't think that that counts. And in one case, Julian Castro, they excised it from the First Amendment. You see this? Julian Castro tweeted out the first amendment and he did dot dot dot where all the religious bits are um because he Yeah. So he said he said when he was asked why he thought Don Lemon was in the right the first amendment and then he said Congress will pass no law and he went dot dot dot and then he said um respecting and then he just did the bits to do with freedom of speech in the press. He missed out the religious part.

59:52 So you can't look at this if you don't look at both sides of it. Now in a courtroom they will look at both sides of it. It is quite complicated. Um, but the notion that Don Lemon is presumptively the victim here, I think is absurd.

1:00:06 Yeah. I mean, the part of the problem is many of the people who have chosen to opine on this case have not actually watched

1:00:13 what Don Lemon actually did inside that church, what he how he sounded, how he behaved. I mean, I saw a debate between Harvey Levan of TMZ and Mark Garagos. Harvey was on Don's side and Mark was on the prosecutor's side. And Harvey was like he he had absolutely every right to go in there. It's a public place. It's a public place. It's not. A church is not a public place. It's a private place. And you get invited for a specific reason, which is to worship here as a Baptist. You can't just storm in there and start getting a manicure. That would also be trespass. You you have a limited invitation to come in for a specific purpose. And if you're there for a different purpose, you are trespassing.

1:00:54 But on top of that, as everybody who's been in journalism for two minutes knows, as soon as they tell you to get out, even if you do have the right to be there, even if it were a public place, if you don't, you're in you're in trouble. Now you're in trouble. And he he was told, he was explicitly told by the pastor,

1:01:11 I want you to leave. It's on camera. And we went back and actually watched exactly what happened after that moment. He went on to interview because he kept sticking his mic in people's faces, at least two more people. He continued his questioning. He did not even come close to immediately leaving the church. Several more minutes passed with him in the church. And then even when he finally did leave, that's when he made his infamously stupid comment watching the people run and cry, saying, "Trama's part of it. Trauma is all part of it."

1:01:42 Which is what the three of us are going to say with the crying abortion seekers. TR, sorry, you're going to have to feel the trauma. I'm just here as a journalist. This is what we journalists do. We enjoy other people's trauma that we helped cause. Um, here's part of what he did inside. I've played this for almost everybody because it's just so clear what he's doing. This is S 20. Our church had gathered for worship, which we do every Sunday, and we were interrupted by this group of protesters. We asked them to leave and and they um obviously have not left. So, what do you think of it?

1:02:18 I mean, this is unacceptable. It's shameful. It's shameful to to interrupt a public gathering of Christians in worship. So,

1:02:27 but but there were folks who I have to take care of my flock. Listen, we live in a there's a constitution in the first amendment to freedom of speech and freedom to assemble and protest.

1:02:37 We're here to worship. We're here to worship Jesus because that's the hope of these cities. That's the hope of the world is Jesus Christ.

1:02:43 I want to be very respectful. Please don't push me though. We're We're here. We're here to worship Jesus. That's why we're here. Okay? That's why we're here. That's what we're about.

1:02:52 Don't you think Jesus would be understanding? And we're we're about love these folks.

1:02:56 We're about spreading the love of Jesus to me. But did you try to talk to them as a as a Christian?

1:02:59 No one is willing to talk. Okay. I I have to take care of my church and my family. So I ask that you actually would also leave this building. You don't want us to

1:03:08 worship. You're here to worship. I'm always worship. I'm a Christian. It's right there. And he explicitly tells him to leave. And he starts it off by saying, "I've asked everyone to leave." And he just keeps going and going and going and then the the ongoing commentary about how this is what it's all about. This is protest and you can you can just protest wherever you want, whenever you want. That's what the Constitution provides, Rich. Um

1:03:31 yes, he went to the Ana Navaro School of Law. Yeah, he used he used the term we at one point. We're going to do this operation. It wasn't a royal we, although given his self-regard, you know, you might want to account for that possibility. Is I'm part of this group. we and he he cites the first amendment with the pastor. He also showed the scene of these people again worshiping in accord with their first amendment rights getting disrupted and braided at by these protesters said oh this is what the first amendment is okay when they're actually violating the first amendment and my other favorite moment of his from inside the church he's talking to one of the parishioners you know about what's going on he says well well there there's a rumor that one of the pastors might be with ICE and the parishioners like well shouldn't you know right I mean it's not you shouldn't you have no right to go in there

1:04:15 regardless but why are you going in there on the the basis of some idiot IC rumor. So, so the whole thing is so moronic and wrong. Again, maybe he gets off, but if he gets off, it still doesn't really mitigate the offense. Th this was a terrible thing to do. It was a violation of our civil society and other people's rights, and he should be ashamed, but he I'm sure he's enjoying it because it's more attention, and he's getting celebrated by all the people he care cares about, whether it's Anna Navaro or Jimmy Kimmel.

1:04:47 Oh, yeah. I'll show. So, he went on Kimmel last night and this I mean speaking of Don Lemon loving Don Lemon. Um here's S 18.

1:04:59 When did you realize that this was a very very big story? I did. I had no idea. I had a little bit of an idea when I got when I asked to use the restroom and you know sort of early in the morning and there was CNN on a monitor and on the thing I could see former CNN anchor Don Lemon arrested in Los Angeles and I was like and I said to the guy I was like uh is that he goes I said is that happening a lot? He goes you've been on all morning.

1:05:26 Yeah. And he says this is a big deal. Uh my attorney said to me I prepared a statement. you can rewrite it and edit it, but you need to deliver the statement. I'm like, deliver it to who? Like, what are you talking about? And they said, "The people who are waiting outside?" And so I go I I my husband and I walk out and I see this like I mean I don't know how many reporters and and paparazzi and and helicopters. I had no idea. And I um I asked my husband, I said, "What happened with the channel today?" Because I was concerned about that's my livelihood and my channel and and my viewers. Um, and he said the channel's been going all day.

1:06:05 I'm sorry. He also didn't finish either his live stream at the church or his interview with Kimmel Charlie without reminding people to like and subscribe. That clip underscores one of the other problems with the commentary around this, which is common in the media, which is the belief that the First Amendment treats journalists who have press passes and W2s differently than it does anyone else. That it applies to the press, that it's a protection of the press. It's not. The First Amendment applies no differently to Walter Kankite than to some guy with an iPhone. But I do think that the way that the Walter Kankites of the world, obviously he's dead, but would expect to be treated is different than the guy with the iPhone. And I suspect that if this had been a right-wing protest, let's put it in a mosque just to make it more salient, and some guy who had never been a CNN anchor and wouldn't have been

1:07:08 covered by CNN subsequently went in and did every single thing precisely the same as Don Lemon, except he wasn't famous and he wasn't on the right. I don't think there would be any outcry at all if a Democratic administration brought a case under the face act. I think part of this claim that Don Lemon and others have made is but I'm famous. But that's not how it works. Now again, I think it will be 50/50. I do think there are strong defenses. I think that the facts will be difficult to parse out in front of a jury. But I just think the idea that there is something intrinsically wrong about this is crazy.

1:07:45 And the analogy I've been drawing is with the Wisconsin judge who tried to help the illegal immigrant escape. If you remember at the time, the first line was, "Oh my god, the Trump administration's arresting judges, as if judges are immune from being held accountable for breaking the law." She did it. She was then charged and she was convicted by a jury of her peers. Yeah.

1:08:07 Because she committed a crime. There's nothing about a judge that is sacrianked and there's nothing about a journalist that is sacrian. They are subject to the same laws and the same protections as the rest of us. It's what Harmy Dylan said on this show last Friday, which was you don't have a magic invisibility cloak just because you declare yourself a journalist while you are participating in a crime. And we all know that. I mean, even just the basic prospect of trespass, which is not what he's been charged with because that's a state crime. But I mean, how many times, you know, in in our journalistic careers have we not been able to enter a a certain venue? We have to stay on the on the sidewalk. If I had a nickel for every time my photographer is like, I my sticks are on the sidewalk. They're on the sidewalk, you know, like to protect us because we we know we're going to get in trouble if we

1:08:57 go any further. We can't. We obey that. There are laws that My point is simply not that he should be charged with trespass, though he should, but just there are laws that apply to us even though we're journalists and we all know that. And when you say that to, you know, these NBCers or ABCers or CNNers who are trying to defend Don Lemon, they know that's true because that's at least one that they all know they have to abide by. Like our news organizations will make sure because they're the ones they're the ones who have to pay the bill. But somehow when it when when it's a law other than trespass, when it when it's a law that's on the books to protect a religious uh organization, they stop being able to understand. It's like, but but what do you mean? He he was just there to document the anti-ICE protesters important work is really the unsaid piece of it, Rich.

1:09:49 Yeah. So he could have documented it maybe not just as well, but he could have documented on on the sidewalk and waited for everyone to come out. He could have had them prior to going in and heard all their planning and whatnot and then talked to everyone when they came out. But he was part of the disruption. And I just want to underline what Charlie said. Scalia is so good on this, was so good on this as so many other things. He pointed out freedom of the press. We tend to think well it's the press like CNN. But at the time of the founding that term kind of institutional press wasn't used. They were thinking more of a printing press which anyone could have access to. Was Benjamin Franklin a journalist or was he a guy with a printing press. So it's meant to protect the the freedom of speech of of everyone, not just people who work at CNN. Now now Don Lemon now is more like the guy as Charlie alluded

1:10:33 to. He's the guy with the iPhone camera rather than the guy with CNN. He's he's just now delighted he gets covered by by CNN in an instance like like this. But again, it doesn't it's it's meant for everyone, freedom of speech. There are all sorts of other First Amendment freedoms. And just because you have that iPhone camera and you say you're covering it doesn't provide immunity to the law and from the law and doesn't mean you can go violate other people's first amendment rights

1:10:59 which they all knew when the J6 reporters got charged by Joe Biden and tried to raise the defense that they were first amendment press and were just there covering it which the DOJ did not tolerate or believe. and threw the book at those that handful of journalists that was trying to cover January 6 saying you crossed the line you you that it is not a shield in the way that you are trying to use it the first amendment um just for the record again it's not exactly required as proof to get Don Lemon but for the record for the Harvey uh Leven of the world after the pastor explicitly told him to get out which we all heard he said in the beginning I've asked everyone to leave and he said at the end and I want you to leave. Uh he spoke to two more parishioners. He continued to describe the scene. He told viewers to like and subscribe. I can't you guys. He talked about the music being very loud and the pastor not

1:11:58 offering a prayer to calm things down, which he didn't appreciate that he didn't calm things down the way Don Lemon wanted in response to the upset Don helped cause. He talked about a young man being in the corner looking upset. He finally leaves about 7 minutes later. The whole thing was only about 15 minutes if that. Um because he wanted to see what was happening outside as parishioners left. He never said he was leaving because the pastor asked really did not care.

1:12:27 Who among us would not leave a church if we were asked by a priest or a pastor to leave. Right. I mean

1:12:33 legal questions aside, put all first amendment aside. Who would stay after a pastor in good faith asked you to go? It it's it's representable.

1:12:42 Was he waiting for an exorcism? then go he he could use it, but who would then go on the Angry Ladies podcast within 24 hours and say, "Those are all white supremacists in there." And he tried to justify it by by then completely disparaging everyone in that church, the children. No, no one had done anything. As far as he knew, they there was absolutely no support for ICE. There may or may not have been one pastor who had an affiliation. Charlie, that was like doubling down on stupid.

1:13:16 But, you know, I think that is a calumny and and I think it is outrageous that he said it. So, please don't get me wrong, but let's just assume for the sake of argument that it had been a white supremacist church. The first amendment protects that. You don't get to do bad things and then go on television and say, "But the victims were mean." The victims are still the victims. That's the whole point of having a constitution that is small L liberal and neutral and covers everyone. It doesn't matter whether those people are the best people who have ever lived in the history of the world or the worst. They're still protected under the face act. And you point out that it is or should have been a trespassing case at root. But the point is, as you know, the reason the face act has been invoked here is because the state didn't bring trespassing charges. That is exactly why the face act exists. It's a civil rights

1:14:12 law. The only point at which the federal government gets to pass laws and enforce laws that protect civil rights is when the local laws are not enforced. That was true in the 1960s in the South and it's true in Minnesota in 2026. And that's why I say it doesn't matter because the left often thinks that unless the victims of a crime are African-Ameans in the 60s, then civil rights don't apply. But that's not true. This is a misconception that has actually corrupted a lot of our civil rights laws. So civil rights don't apply to Asians who are being discriminated against in education. Civil rights don't apply to Christians who rights are being abused by progressives. But that isn't true. You don't have to

1:14:59 or to whites who get fired for their skin color. You do not have to raise an affirmative defense in a civil rights case to say that you're one of the good guys. You're covered if you're an American citizen whose rights have been violated. So, it's especially annoying that he went and did that cuz what he wants the audience to hear is, "Oh, they're bad guys then." Well, they're not. And that's a horrible slander. But even if they were or the audience doesn't like them or Anna Navaro thinks that they're undesirable, who cares? the federal government still should uphold the the law in their defense.

1:15:32 I'll tell you what, the the other thing that needs to happen here is a civil lawsuit must be filed in particular against Don Lemon. If I were any one of those parishioners, most especially a mother of a child who was terrified or the woman who either broke her arm, they alleged it was broken in the indictment, but clearly hurt, which is what Pam Bondi said later. um I'd be suing uh because it helps. An intentional infliction of emotional distress claim can be brought, but they're much stronger if you can tie it to some actual injury, you know, like like a like a physical injury. Uh and certainly eyewitnesses seeing somebody hurt her arm or eyewitnesses seeing strong evidence of emotional distress like a child crying in his mother's arms would be very helpful to this claim. And Don Lemon has plenty of money from his multiple lawsuits he continues to file against anybody who tries to fire him.

1:16:26 Um, and they should they should make him pay. They should make at a minimum he should be made to pay for the trauma he helped cause those children. He's bragging about how he's the most famous. He's the biggest name. You know what that gets you? You get listed as the first defendant in the lawsuit against everyone who went in there. So, we'll watch as that unfolds. All right, let's keep going. Um, speaking of crazy things in courtrooms, this judge, this judge who late yesterday tried to stop the Trump administration and for now has stopped the Trump administration from removing temporary protected status from Haitians. So Joe Biden let some nearly 400,000 Haitians into the country and said, "With my magic wand, I declare you temporary protected status, which means you're not an illegal. You can't be kicked out because you've got my magic, you know, uh, designation." And um, Trump came in and said, "I'm lifting

1:17:26 that that we're not we're not going to wait that out. I'm lifting that right now." And this judge has said, and this is the same judge who said that Trump wasn't allowed to say transgender people can't serve in the military. And she was reversed for a a hysterical opinion she issued there. And uh now she's at it again saying Trump as the sitting commander-in-chief does not have the power to remove with his pen what Joe Biden granted with his. And on and on you can hear the woman's ideology. Uh Angela Anna Reyes is her name. Federal District Court of Washington um where she says there's a there's a hostility to non-white immigrants that Christy Gnome has shown. She uh goes on to say the government has not cited any reason to end temporary protected status for Haitians abruptly and its approach is not in the public interest. She's decided quote the government does not cite any reason termination must occur

1:18:23 post haste. Secretary Gnome complains of strains that unlawful immigrants place on our immigration enforcement system. Her answer turned 300,000 352,959 lawful immigrants into unlawful ones overnight. She complains of strains to our economy. Her answer, turn employed lawful immigrants who contribute billions in taxes into the legally unemployable. She complains of strains to our healthcare system. Her answer, turn the insured into the uninsured. This approach is many things. In the public interest is not one of them.

1:18:59 What? Who died and elected her president? Rich, she's the the new DHS secretary, I guess. So, we saw this in the first term as well where some judges apparently consider unilateral executive action a one-way ratchet. So, Obama could do things unilaterally and then when Trump just wanted to reverse it, judges said, "No, no, you can't do that. That would be crazy." And this is a version of that made even worse by the fact that this is temporary protected status with emphasis on temporary which means eventually it's supposed to go away and be reversed.

1:19:30 Look, I don't think it's great. It's a bad situation for these Haitians. You had an administration letting them in with the assumption, oh, you get to stay forever. That's the way temporary protected statuses very often work. But under the law, Trump obviously can revoke it. And this just goes to the the broad a broad broader aspect of this whole immigration debate over the last year where the left and Democrats and Biden, they created facts on the ground by letting a bunch of people in either legally kind of laundering people otherwise wouldn't get in through the these various means, the CPB app or this TPS status for Haitians and others and or or just just let them flood in and give them a notice to appear that was going to be ignored. And then when Trump comes in and says, "Okay, I'm going to revoke the temporary status. I'm going to, you know, end CPP. I'm going to go after and deport these people." Like,

1:20:17 "No, you can't do that. This is the status quo." And a a big problem are Hollywood celebrities, folks in Minneapolis. They now take it as a given that the status quo of ignoring the law, the black and white letter of the law was a status quo such as that it's an intolerable act of aggression. If someone actually dares to do what the law says should be done, you detain the illegal immigrants until their proceedings reach reach a final conclusion. And if they can stay, fine. And if they go, you deport them. That's what it says in the law. And Trump's offense here is just trying to actually apply the law for a change.

1:20:57 I mean, now we have a pair of rulings over the past 72 hours. This one we discussed yesterday a bit with Jonathan Turley, the one from the judge in Texas, uh who who decided that the the little boy and his dad who were uh arrested by uh Border Patrol in Minneapolis and shipped down getting ready for removal back to their native country that he had to be released. they both had to be released and finished his opinion with a picture of the little boy in the in the dog hat um with the wrong date said it was dated February 31st was lecturing and sanctimonious throughout the opinion I mean speaking of Scalia Charlie he would be horrified at the attempts to legislate from the bench we are seeing these days

1:21:46 yeah that second opinion you mentioned was honestly one of the most unhinged things I've ever read from a judge to the point at which I initially thought it had been faked. The February 31st made me wonder if it was a joke. That was not law and he's not a judge. The annoying part of this, I think, is that these decisions are given the impromaturur of law. And so those who favor them can say, "Look, the Trump administration once again has been struck down by a judge." But what is conspicuously missing from the first case we were discussing, the judge Reyes case with temporary protected status is any specific references to the statute.

1:22:41 Now I am, as you know, a big critic of the way that Congress has over the years delegated powers to the president. There are far too many laws in my view that say in the judgment of the president or in the estimation of the secretary or that just hand sweeping powers that were reserved to Congress to the president. But Congress has done that and it's done that a lot in the area of immigration. And one of the things that it has allowed the president to do for example is determine if there are any countries uh from which uh immigrants might pose a threat. you can shut those down. Another thing that Congress has allowed the president to do is determine whether or not people deserve temporary protected status and when that temporary protected status stops. The laws here aren't particularly complicated. They don't say the president has to file a report that meets 17 different criteria. They say in

1:23:37 the public interest, they say in the judgment of the president. And the Supreme Court has historically treated this area as non-justiceable. That is to say that the Supreme Court does not decide whether or not the president's judgment was correct, only whether or not he got to make it. This isn't like the tariffs area uh where it is much more cabined. So Joe Biden was allowed to determine that Haiti Haiti and Haitians qualified for temporary protected status and Joe Biden did. And Donald Trump is allowed to say that they no longer do. If I think it would be silly, but if Donald Trump tomorrow said Britain is such a mess that the British are entitled to temporary protected status, no judge could say that that was wrong. And no judge could say that a subsequent president who made the opposite determination was wrong either.

1:24:32 We've already had a Supreme Court case that is almost identical to this one. We know what the Supreme Court, this Supreme Court thinks about this matter. It has come up before. It will come up again. This will be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court is going to say, I think what I just said, which is this is a non-judicial question. The same power that allowed Biden to let them in allows Donald Trump to send them home. It doesn't really matter whether people like that, think it's fair or mean or great or bad. She mentioned insurance, employment, economic contributions.

1:25:04 Those things are not in the law. If they were, she'd have a point, but they're not. So he gets to do this in the way Biden got to do it and the judges do not get to second guessess him unless there is a law that says to the contrary.

1:25:19 This is the second time now that she's tried to overturn a decision by Trump or his secretary uh thanks to quote animus. The trans uh opinion she issued was all about his alleged animus and Pete Hex says alleged animist towards trans people. This one's all about the alleged animus of Christy Gnome to people from third world countries. And they quote her saying stuff similar to what Trump has said, like I don't think she used the term hole countries, but she came close like we just don't want these people here anymore. They leech off of us and we're they're out. And she's using that to say this is a racial animist that's motivating this.

1:25:58 Meanwhile, good luck with that if they actually do look at I mean Trump very clearly wants to stop these immigrants from everywhere. I mean, he's look what he did at the southern border. He doesn't want anybody here on on temporary protected status. Like, I don't know if there's another example of a group of white immigrants from like Denmark who he's allowing. They probably got shipped off to Greenland by Trump anyway and a dog sled. Um, so this is this woman's a problem. She's an activist and she's using her own priors to try to sweep Christine Gnome and Pete Hexath and Donald Trump all under this, you know, you you're full of hatred banner. And I like she's going to have to get her hand slapped again by the Supreme Court. You're right. Trisha McGlaughlin, who's the DHS spokesperson, tweeted out, "Supreme Court, here we come. This is lawless activism that we will be vindicated on." And went on from

1:26:47 there. Uh, all right. Stand by, guys. We're going to take a quick break and we will be back and I have a special special treat for you guys on Billy Isish. We did a story on her yesterday and there's been quite a development and you are just the perfect guys to discuss it with. Next, one of the biggest problems in American healthcare right now is access. You usually can't get medication until you're already sick. Healthcare should not only work when it is convenient for the system, though. It should work when people actually need it. That's where all family pharmacy is different. They let you plan ahead by ordering prescription medications before you're sick. Wouldn't that be nice? You order online, a licensed doctor reviews your request, and writes the prescription, and your medication strip ships straight to your door. Doesn't that make sense? It's not like people are getting high off of Ivormectin, you

1:27:34 know, like they want it because they're traveling. They don't want to have to wait, but they treat it like it's like some some sort of contraband. Uh, thanks to all family pharmacy, you won't be dealing with waiting rooms, insurance delays, last minute scrambling, and they offer antibiotics, antivirals, tamlu, ivormectin, yes, and hundreds of other prescription meds. This is about access, responsibility, and being prepared, giving you the ability to plan ahead. Go to allfamilyfarm pharmacy.com/megan. Use that code Megan10 to get 10% off your next order. You've seen those red light panels, right? But this is totally different. Let me tell you about the glow infrared therapy light from Sauna Space. They say it helps with screen fatigue, your skin, your mood, and energy. It's incandescent light, not LED, which makes all the difference. In the morning, it's like natural sunlight, and at night, it helps you relax and get

1:28:28 ready for seriously deep sleep. They say you can even use it for pain relief on sore muscles or cramps. And the real game changer is their fire light sauna, the future of saunas. It's portable, it's gorgeous, and it's powerful. And you're getting red light therapy as well as an infrared sauna all-in-one. All made in the US with pure organic materials and zero EMFs. Sauna spent over a decade perfecting their fire light spectrum and thousands of studies support the benefits. Elevate your at home wellness with Saunac's Firelight infrared technology. Visit sauna.space/Maggan.

1:29:04 And use code Megan for 10% off your entire order. That's sauna.space/megan code Megan for 10% off. Just FYI, that presser on the the missing mom of Savannah Guthrie has not yet started. We are monitoring. If it starts and breaks news, we will bring that to you. Back with me now are National Reviews Rich Lowry and Charlie Cook. Um, so yesterday we discussed some of the antics at the absurd Grammys on Sunday night. And one of the people we discussed was singer Billy Isish for saying the following. Watch.

1:29:41 No one is illegal on stolen land. I love that. And yeah, it's just really hard to know what to say and what to do right now. And I just I feel really hopeful in this room and I feel like we just need to keep fighting and speaking up and protesting and our our voices really do matter and the people matter. And um I say sorry

1:30:19 in that blacked out part she said f ICE. Um her voice does matter guys. It matters a lot. It matters to the Tongva tribe. Uh which is actually technically under her logic the owner of the land on which her $14 million house sits. It's worth much more than that. It was bought for that a few years ago. And here is what has happened since Sunday night. her lavish mansion located on land that belongs to the Tongva tribe, the indigenous people of the greater Los Angeles basin. Um, they're upset about this land. It's theirs, ancestral ancestral land. They have issued the following statement. We appreciate the opportunity to provide clarity regarding the recent comments made by Billy Isish.

1:31:01 as the first people of the greater Los Angeles basin. We do understand that her home is situated in our ancestral land, they said, adding, she has not reached out to the tribe herself. Isish has not contacted our tribe directly regard regarding her property. We do value the instance when public figures provide visibility to the true history of this country. Additionally, the tribe said they've contacted Isish's team, quote, to express our appreciation for her comments. It is our hope that in future discussions, the tribe can be explicitly referenced to ensure the public understands that the greater LA basin remains Gabriel Leno Tongva territory.

1:31:44 And so, the real question here is when is she going to return her mansion to the Tongva? Rich, I mean, 321, no time like the present. There's no such thing as an illegal on stolen land.

1:31:56 I'm sure it'd be a great community center for for the tribe, and she can go someplace else that that she thinks was rightfully secure. Now, so many levels of absurdity to this one, stealing land is what human beings did almost throughout the entirety of our history, very much including Native Americans, right? And this is in some ways it speaks well of us as a western society that you have people thinking this in these terms. We stole it that that was bad because no one no Comanche was thinking oh we really shouldn't have done that to the Apaches when we pushed them out. No Irakcoy after they bought a bunch of rifles from the Dutch and the English were thinking no we shouldn't do this to the Makans right they just took the land. So if you kind of peel the onion every tribe that you know Ben and Jerry say the Lakotas the Black Hills back or whatever it is they stole it from someone else. They moved in there

1:32:46 and displaced other people. So this is how it works. And then it was through American leadership that you get a postw World War II situation where we take national sovereignty seriously. We take borders seriously. And and this just goes to how radical some of this the contentions are on im immigration. It's not just that borders don't have any legitimacy in terms of excluding people. We have no right to be here ourselves. It's it's a it's a criticism of the United States of America at its foundations. Charlie Billy Isish will never give back her mansion to the Tongva. Nor will any of these Hollywood celebrities who try to lecture us or make us do a land acknowledgement before we can hear them perform ever do such a gesture.

1:33:33 As stupid as her comments were, and they were made all the more so by the fact that for some reason she seemed to be wearing an academic gown of the sort you would expect the commencement speaker to wear. But the the thing that

1:33:46 amaz you can identify it as anything. I thought it looked like a domino. It was odd, wasn't it? But she clearly had just heard that sentence somewhere or seen it on a fortune cookie or something and decided to say it. But I thought the more disturbing part was when the camera panned to the audience. The expressions on their faces was so vacant. There was this sort of

1:34:09 yes look in their eyes that honestly kind of worried me. It was weird. And I think as a result uh we ought perhaps not to take them too seriously because they're not going to do anything about it. As Rich says though, the core idea there is, if taken to its logical conclusion, exclusive of the sovereignty and authority of the United States government and all of the 50 states as well. So, while Billy Isish might not worry me, those sentiments when expressed from within the institutional left, as they often are, and within academia, do because if there is no such thing as an illegal person, then there's no such thing as a citizen. And if there's no such thing as a citizen, then there's no such thing as a government because we live in a representative government and a constitutional republic. So she hasn't thought it through. It's very silly. But it is actually quite destructive of everything

1:35:07 else that we believe in. And then if you look at the behavior in Minnesota, you can sort of see how one leads to the other because if Oh yeah. Right. Because if there is no such thing as an illegal person, well then all immigration laws are illegitimate and there's nothing wrong with nullifying federal law and then you kind of get rid of everything we've built up. Yes. Okay. Now, speaking of someone who hasn't thought it through uh couple years ago, this guy was in the news for getting married and Taylor Swift went to his wedding. He's written a bunch of songs for her. Apparently, he's a prolific songwriter and he's very well known in the music industry and his name is Jack Antinoff and um he was there at the Grammys and he did have on one of those little ice out pins and unfortunately for Jack, he got asked about it. And here's how that went.

1:36:01 Watch close. Can you talk to me a little bit about the pin that you're wearing tonight?

1:36:06 I mean, why is that important? This is terrible, you Oh, I mean it's time to is is just for every reason you could imagine, I would think, but um

1:36:19 yeah, I'm a bit speechless trying to even talk about it. Completely. Yeah, absolutely. It's like hard to talk about anything else at this point. Um

1:36:27 but is it we can do both and and find a way to uh I don't know. It's it's just a really good time for uh people to come together and and figure out how to move through this because it's only going to be small communities that can really help.

1:36:45 Rich, he has no idea why he is. A Greenland related protest. Maybe the ice ice in Greenland.

1:36:54 This is why that was amazing. This is why I've written about this. This is why so many of those people when they complain use the phrase, you know, with with everything that's going on because they don't know what's going on. So they've just heard there's something bad and they say it's very hard to talk about anything else with everything that's going on. Then you ask what's going on and they say, you know, everything.

1:37:17 And then the moronic reporter, as opposed to realizing, oh my god, this is actually a great moment. I could actually really expose him. She's like, oh, you know, like who who does have the words, you know, who

1:37:26 neither of them know what it is probably. No. And of course for the listening audience, he's wearing the ice out pin, but normally you put that on your lapel. He has it way down on his like his hip pocket. It's almost like he he didn't even want to wear it, but they were handing him out when you walked in. He's like, "Okay, I guess I have to put this thing on and then had the misfortune of being asked about it."

1:37:51 It's like a skit from Arrested Development or something. So dumb. And honestly, Justin Bieber, I mentioned him. He was out there with one of those pins yesterday. Truly, I mean, honestly, one of the dumbest people in public life. He sings well. I I wouldn't take that away from him. But for for him who was like a week ago in his tidy whiteies doing a concert to try to lecture us. We pulled a couple of pictures of Justin Bieber because like when you see Justin Bieber walking around in these paparazzi shots where like literally the only part of him you can really see is just the little circle of his face because he's covered in his sweatshirt from head to toe or he's wearing his bizarre I don't know what like Justin Bieber is kind of like a Britney Spears Spears figure to me. He's like kind of gone. He became too big a star, too rich at too early an age and now I don't I mean he's like probably

1:38:39 about six months away from a conservatorship from the look of it who now wants to lecture us on immigration policy. Rich, should we ask him perhaps about temporary protected status and the latest decision which is based on alleged racial animist?

1:38:53 Yeah, it's a little bit like the the French French Revolution. and you had to wear a cockade to show you're with the revolutionaries. And a lot of people just did it because they were scared or because everyone else was was doing it or they're forced to do it. I think at at one point the king was was wearing it because, you know, he's afraid of getting executed. But, you know, there's an elite that decides what the cause is. And and these are all lemmings. They they of course pride themselves in their great independence of mind and courage, but it's nothing of the sort. They just do what everyone else thinks they're they do what they're supposed to do and and play act. And a lot of them are, you know, actors and they they sing the words put in front of them. And this is just a version of that.

1:39:32 All right, guys. I gotta go, but um you guys tell me. You've got my phone number. Shoot me a text. You tell me what you think I should ask Vice President JD Vance about in our sitdown tomorrow. Looking forward to this. It'll be super fun. It's going to air on the program tomorrow. We definitely It's going to air tomorrow and we hope it'll air during our two-hour block on SiriusXM um between 12 and 2. Okay, Charlie Rich, thanks. You guys are the best. And we'll have full coverage um of what's happening in the Nancy Guthrie case as well.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "Shock New Details About Guthrie Kidnapping, and Lemon's Absurd Kimmel Appearance, with Lowry & Cooke"?

Megan Kelly (Guest), James Fitzgerald (Guest), Randy Sutton (Guest), Savannah Guthrie (Guest), Chris Nanos (Guest).

What is "Shock New Details About Guthrie Kidnapping, and Lemon's Absurd Kimmel Appearance, with Lowry & Cooke" about?

The search for Nancy Guthrie, mother of "Today Show" host Savannah Guthrie, is intensifying following the discovery of blood and signs of forced entry at her Arizona home, leading authorities to investigate a possible kidnapping. Law enforcement officials have confirmed that DNA tests so far indicate the blood belongs solely to Nancy, raising concerns about her wellbeing amid ongoing…

What is mentioned in this Megyn Kelly episode?

15 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Nancy Guthrie, Megan Kelly, Savannah Guthrie, Chris Nanos, James Fitzgerald, Randy Sutton. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "Shock New Details About Guthrie Kidnapping, and Lemon's Absurd Kimmel Appearance, with Lowry & Cooke"?

The episode runs 1 h 40 min; the transcript is about 18,811 words in 175 timestamped sections.

More from Megyn Kelly

• All analyzed episodes
• Books mentioned on Megyn Kelly
• People mentioned on Megyn Kelly
• Sponsors mentioned on Megyn Kelly
• Topics mentioned on Megyn Kelly