Transcript

🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING

From MeidasTouch · Episode page · Watch on YouTube

· 33 min · 5,869 words · 58 timestamped sections

This is the full, timestamped transcript of "🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING", an episode of MeidasTouch published January 8, 2026 (33 min, about 5,869 words). It mentions 2 people, works and ideas, including Department of Justice, Donald Trump.

What this episode is about

FBI whistleblowers are revealing information about what Donald Trump may be concealing in the Epstein files, with insights from independent reporters Allison Gil and Katie Fang. Tensions escalate as former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino criticizes Congressman Thomas Massie’s efforts to release these files, while also engaging in a public feud with fellow political figures.

Key takeaways

  • FBI whistleblowers are buzzing—Epstein's files are the new Pandora's box for Trump.
  • Dan Bonino’s podcast drama rivals reality TV—grifters attacking grifters is peak MAGA chaos.
  • Claiming 'newly discovered' Epstein docs in December? Sounds like holiday wishful thinking.
  • In the game of political chess, Bonino’s podcast pivot shows a checkered past for the FBI.
  • When 'sources say' starts trending, you know someone's dirty laundry is about to air publicly.

Who speaks in this episode?

What is discussed, and when

  1. – 5:00: Donald Trump
  2. – 10:00: Department of Justice
  3. – 15:00: Department of Justice, Donald Trump
  4. – 20:00: Department of Justice
  5. – 25:00: Donald Trump
  6. – 32:57: Department of Justice

Notable quotes from "🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING"

  • From his official FBI account. The Midas Touch is hard at work with FBI sources exposing Donald Trump's lies about the Epstein file. So, why don't I bring in Cal Katie Fang and Allison. Make sure you subscribe to their channels as well.
    about Donald Trump · at
  • Didn't say it. Maybe the White House said it because now the White House controls the Department of Justice Twitter account, which is banana pants in its own right. That's a…
    about Department of Justice · at

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

Companies & orgs

Full transcript with timestamps

Uh-oh, Donald. FBI whistleblowers are talking to the Midas Touch Network about what you're hiding in the Epstein files. We've got our sources. Allison Gil from Muller, she wrote, Katie Fang, as we keep building out the Midas Touch Network with some of the greatest independent reporters in the game today. Guess what? We're also getting sources inside the FBI who tell us about your dirty deeds. I want to go and talk about what we're learning from Allison and Katie in just a moment. You're not going to want to miss this. A reminder, subscribe to the Midas Touch YouTube channel. Let's get to 6 million subscribers. Subscribe to Katie Fang and Allison's channels as well. So, I just find it interesting that Dan Bonino, the former deputy FBI director who was previously a podcaster before becoming the deputy FBI director, he said he was going to expose the Epstein files and release everybody on the list. Well, Dan

Bon Gino has gone back to podcasting and now he's attacking Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who has been instrumental in releasing the Epstein files. So, Bonino, you're mad at the guy who's actually did the work with Ro Conor to release the files. Okay. Okay. Dan Bonino and Cat Turd attacking Thomas Massie. That's who was running the FBI. A guy who's now returning returning was retweeting the Republican mascot. Cater the MAGA mascot. Bonino is also waring with former Congress member Matt Gates. Matt Gates said, "So did Ban when did Dan Bonino run for office and how did he perform as a candidate?" To which Dan Bonino attacks Matt Gates. Maybe if I spent more time at shady parties with moneyed insiders, I would have won. I heard you know a bit about that. You've always been a dick, by the way, grifting off your daddy like a suckling little doggy. When I first met you in the panhandle, I knew you were a piece of

It's written all over that phony face of yours. Okay, Dan Bonino, I'm not sure if I were you, I'd be talking about other people's faces right now, but could you believe this is the way these people talk to each other? These are like a bunch of freaking maniacs, by the way. Um, and then you have Dan Bonino reposting these right-wing accounts. You're damn right I did. Dan Bonino announces he's declared war on grifters and black pillars attempting to hijack MAGA. That's about to be some freaking hell to pay to which cat turd. You're probably like, Ben, what are you even talking about here? Can you just tell me about what your sources from the FBI know? I'm just trying to show you that this was the guy and these are the people who were leading MAGA and they have their own like Furby language that they speak to each other in. And I'm just trying to show you like what they're talking about. Dan had the

number one podcast. He's about to expose all these piece of losers. and I'm here for it is what Cat Turd says. They're talking about the MAGA grifters that they're going after. Um, you guys may want to meet a mirror and look at yourself when you say all that stuff. All right. Well, Dan Bonino said that it was busy last day on his job two days ago and it's going to be his last post from his official FBI account. The Midas Touch is hard at work with FBI sources exposing Donald Trump's lies about the Epstein file. So, why don't I bring in Cal Katie Fang and Allison. Make sure you subscribe to their channels as well.

Katie, take it away. One of the greatest things about being in partnership with the Midas Touch Network is I get to work with other contributors like Allison Gil. And when she reached out to me about her sourced, confidential, anonymous new information regarding the Epstein files and how it was linked to my recent reporting that shows that it's not plausible, feasible, reasonable, or the truth that the US attorney's office or the FBI just suddenly discovered a million more documents right around Christmas time that dealt with Epstein, Maxwell, and others. I jumped at the opportunity to be able to spend time with her. And so Alice and I got together and we recorded an episode that we are going to show you now so that you can be caught up on why it doesn't seem real that the US attorney's office suddenly discovered these documents and why it just goes to show that the obstruction is the point.

I know I was supposed to take a break this week. I was supposed to have this week off, but I do have some exclusive breaking news that landed on my desk. Um, and I have this for you. And this is about the claims made by Todd Blanch, Trump's former personal attorney, now deputy attorney general, who's still his personal attorney. And Todd Blanch's claims that oops, we found a million never seen before Epstein documents. Now, he says he was contacted by the FBI New York field office and the Southern District of New York. Well, maybe he didn't say it. Maybe the White House said it because now the White House controls the Department of Justice Twitter account, which is banana pants in its own right. That's a whole different story. But somebody at the DOJ social media account says that Todd Blanch was contacted by the Southern District of New York, New York FBI field office. And whoa, we've got a million

new documents and he's put lawyers on it from the National Security Division at Main Justice. We'll talk about that and who's part of that. Uh and lawyers in the Southern District of Florida. There was a memo that went out that said, "Hey lawyers in the Southern District of Florida, even though your life sucks and we fired all your colleagues and morale is in the we would love for you to spend your Christmas holiday uh per kind of hinting at, hey, if you're Jewish, Hanukkah's over. Will you remotely redact these files and help, you know, protect pedophiles? I'm sure you would love to do that uh for your holiday season." So, we had that. Uh, and I I actually reached out to sources uh to to sources at the FBI who I've spoken to before. I've been speaking to for most of the year and sources at the Department of Justice who participated in the project to redact the Epstein files, also known as to most FBI agents

who worked on it, this Um, and they did this this past March. And they have actually exposed Todd Blanch's lies. And like I said, I [snorts] have that exclusive breaking news for you here on the Midas Touch Network today. So, welcome to the breakdown. Okay. And joining me today, I couldn't think of a better person to join me today because of some reporting that my colleague here at Midas Touch uh did about the million document lie. Uh, someone who's been reporting on this did did a report the day after Christmas. My colleague here, like I said, at Might is Katie Fang. Katie, hello. Welcome.

Oh, Allison, it's so so nice to be with you and happy holidays. Thank you. You as well. This is what we do over the holidays. Big ups to Women in Independent Media for getting this

information out. First of all, everybody needs to see your reporting on this alleged million document discovery being pedled by Todd Blanch, who's already been caught in so many lies this term. Documentary evidence. I'm thinking of the Abrego case where he said, "I had nothing to do with the decision to charge Mr. Argo with crimes. Oops. Because of some discovery we pried out of the government. Turns out that was a lie. I feel like Mory Povich." Turns out lie detector says that was a lie. So, he's already been caught. or the father.

Yeah you are the father of a bunch of A whole bunch of lies. So, [snorts] uh, you know, not only should he not be trusted, Katie, it should be assumed that the opposite of whatever he says is actually the truth. So,

you went over a couple of letters and memos um, and statements that indicate that the Department of Justice has had the and the New York FBI field office and Southern District of New York Epstein files for a long time now. So, let's start and we're going to have a link in the show notes, by the way, to your report because I absolutely love it.

So, let's start with the letter that Jamie Rascin sent to Pamela Joe Bondi pursuant to whistleblower survivors and survivors attorneys who came and spoke to him as protected whistleblowers. Yeah, you got to hand it to certain members of Congress that have doggedly made this a priority in addition to all the other hard work that they've been doing on behalf of all Americans. And I always underscore this that it's regardless of party affiliation, they're fighting for all of us, whether you like it or not, right? Whether you appreciate it or not, they are. And I think of people like Jamie Rascin and Robert Garcia and others, right? So Jamie Rascin back on November 3rd of 2025 sent this letter to Pamela Joe, Pam Bondie, sorry. I call her Pamela Joe that do.

Okay. Yes. Pamela Joe. Pammy Joe gets this letter back on November 3rd. And what's impeccable about Jamie Raskin is he brings receipts always. And not only does he have plethora of uh footnotes and endnotes, but he cites to the council for the Epstein victims and survivors when he says that up until January of 2025, and of course, no coincidences, right? When Trump gets sworn into office, there were representations made that there was an ongoing investigation into co-conspirators of Epstein Maxwell and others. And then suddenly and abruptly in January of 2025, not only are those investigations terminated, but the entirety of the Epstein case file is transferred to Maine Justice, which is what we refer to as the Department of Justice located in Washington DC. So Rascin as as early we'll say early, not late, as November 3rd of 2025 in his letter to Pamela Joe states that there was an active investigation into Epstein

and Maxwell's co-conspirators until January of 2025. And then in January, the Southern District of New York was ordered by Maine Justice to transfer the Epstein case files to DOJ headquarters in Washington DC. Since that time, January of 2025, crickets in terms of any type of outreach, active investigation, or active pursuit of any of the threads that you could pull, financial um or or otherwise that could be relevant to Epstein and Maxwell. And so when I saw that Allison, I was like, whoa, whoa, hold a second. How in the world can Todd Blanch as the deputy attorney general of the United States now make a public affirmative representation to us as Americans that they quote unquote suddenly found more than a million documents,

right? And you know, then you brought up a letter from Pam from Pammy Joe to Kosh Patel that she wrote way back on February 27th and it had something to do with I I've heard that there are now a bunch of files that you found in New York. You need to send them to me. You have until tomorrow morning and then you have 14 days to tell me why, etc. So talk about that letter as well.

Well, that was kind of outrageous. Let me be clear too. Congressman Raskin, Jamie Raskin also demanded information for Pamela Joe and of course they got nothing, right? Because why bother? Why bother to have transparency in your role to Congress even though Congress understandably is looking from, you know, House Judiciary? They're like, "Hey, we need to have this information." So this letter that you just talked about, it's such a curious tenor, right? because it's dated February 27th from Pamela Joe to Cash Patel and it basically is again going through the chronology of Pamela Joe trying to cover her ass in terms of trying to get her hands on the Epstein files. Now there's no coincidences again February 27th. The date of this letter Allison is the same date that Pamela Joe sat down at the White House with 15 farright MAGA influencers and she herself personally delivered quote unquote Epstein file

binder number one. And present at that meeting was convicted felon Donald Trump, JD Vance, Todd Blanch, Cash Patel, and others. Right? So, they're all there for this big fanfare that was a big wampwamp. Nothing new. But she tells Cash Patel in this letter that late yesterday, as of February 26th, I learned from a quote source that the FBI field office in New York was in possession of thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation and indictment of Epstein. because she says earlier in this letter, Allison, that she had only received 200 pages of documents, most of which 99% of which had already been made publicly available. So, she demanded by February 28th at 8 a.m. that you, the FBI, deliver quote, the full and complete Epstein files to my office. And she said, "You also have to give me a report within 14 days comprehensively covering why my order to the FBI was never followed to begin with." And of course,

once again, crickets. There's no evidence of a comprehensive report ever been generated by Cash Patel, nor is there evidence that thousands of pages of documents were sent over to the DOJ as far back as the end of February of 2025.

No. So, we're sitting here looking at these letters, assuming that Todd Blanch is full of it, and that these documents had already been transferred early in the year. Well, I have to tell you because on your show uh here on Midas Touch, you said given that turnaround and the demand by Pam Bondi that if you were being generous and and showing the government a little bit of grace and being a little a little generous that the Department of Justice would have received all the New York files probably in March. Okay. Now, [snorts] Katie, when I saw those letters, I I reached out to the same sources who told me about the thousand people locked in the building confirming Jason Leupold's reporting from March. Um, I got I got new information about there being an Excel spreadsheet to log Trump's name and a master file Excel spreadsheet.

Remember, yeah, PowerPoint presentation with training videos on how to find and redact Trump's name and mark stuff for redaction in the Epstein transparency project, which is hilarious. Well, I reached back out to them about these letters, and again, these are the same ones who told me about the training videos, which again was was confirmed by by Jason Leopold this this past November. And sources say that not only did New York send over everything they had in March, but that the entire review process using the thousand analysts from the information management division at the FBI, that exercise was specifically to review the boxes of files from New York, 300,000 pages, 100,000 files from New York, and they were to give them, redact them, and send them to the Department of Justice for eventual release. That was that that was their job. And one source told me it was a comprehensive set of files from New York

with some of the files dating back to 2009 around the Sweetheart deal time. So this wasn't just like a oh we found a couple of files or we found some grand jury materials or oh we found the 302s. This was supposed to be a comprehensive set and they have confirmed that that entire exercise in March where they paid a million dollars in overtime for a week when they locked the thousand people in the building 24 48 hour shifts. That review was the review of the New York files Pam Bondi asked Kosh Patel for in the February 27th letter. That's according to people who were there. I said was was your job there in response to that Pam Bondi letter? They said yes.

That is our understanding. So, I just had to let you know that that's like nuts. But it's but it's so on brand, isn't it? I mean, again, I've always tried to be generous about the construction of this and to not think that it's totally nefarious. And one of the most generous ways to interpret this is like the right hand doesn't know what the left hand's doing kind of energy. And yet, that doesn't actually pass the smell test here. they have had possession and or have known about the stuff which is why the July memo that was publicly released by the FBI and the DOJ in together right jointly claiming that there was nothing there that it was all a nothing burger that they had reviewed 300 gigabytes of data and evidence and that there were no more co-conspirators to investigate etc. I mean, it was such a big show in July and to know that they've had their hands on this, Allison, just goes to show that

the true conspiracy is happening in the Trump administration. Yeah, for sure. And Katie, I took this a step further after watching your report, reaching out to sources at the FBI and DOJ that reviewed the files in March, current and former. Uh, I recalled, as I mentioned earlier, Jason Leupold at Bloomberg recently in November released 76 pages of internal FBI emails about the Epstein redaction project. So, I figured I'd look in those emails to see what it said about the files from New York. Here's one email. This is from the assistant director of the FBI information management division. The IMD is the thousand plus agents that were redacting the files. Her name is Sharon Perry. She's all over these emails. It's dated March 10th. Okay, so think about that everybody. This is 12 days after Pam Bondi demanded the files. And this email says, "We are prepared to receive boxes tomorrow as New York agents are

traveling to the Washington field office in the morning and will arrive to Winchester where they will start photographing and we will start scanning and processing these physical files. Once I see the volume of files, I'll have a better estimate of processing times. Although I suggest we do a rolling delivery to further demonstrate the FBI's commitment to delivery and transparency.

Unbelievable. So they March 10th, 2025. Mhm. Now, here's an email sent from April 15th from the FBID assistant director, same person. April 15th, a little over a month later. Uh, also did you happen to send the results of the below to headquarters and or DOJ at any point? If not, no worries. Just want to confirm if there are any additional deliverables to provide to the Department of Justice. To date, we have provided the redaction project and the 1BXL summary of the video and media content. So there is an April 15th email saying, "We have sent over the comprehensive Epstein files from New York field office over to Washington to the FBI to be processed, redacted, reviewed, and sent to the Department of Justice pursuant to Pamela Bond's letter."

Past tense. We have provided past tense the redaction project. And this is as of April 15th of 2025.

Yeah. So March, you gave them a little grace. I guess they need a little more grace to get to get it done by April 15th, tax day. [gasps] Um, and Katie, I also wanted to point out something that you mentioned in your reporting that Blanch had assigned redactions to the National Security Lawyers at Main Justice.

That's right. Because that was a part of one of the permissible withholdings and redactions that was allowed under the Transparency Act.

Now, [snorts] I just want to make sure everybody knows who's in charge of that group of lawyers. is a guy named John Eisenberg. And if that sounds familiar, it might. It's way in the past. But Katie, that's the same lawyer who removed Alex Vinman's edits.

The impeachment stuff. Oh my god. With Zalinsky Oh my gosh. That's the guy who wouldn't accept Vinman's edits on the transcript. And that's the guy who hid that transcript in the secret code word classified system to keep eyes off. So known document manipulator is in charge of redacting the Epstein files.

But you know what else is but but you know there really shouldn't well I mean you know what I I could be totally dead wrong on this right Alison? But there really shouldn't be a lot of national security information you would think in this. Then again I don't know there's a reason why everybody's been talking about um who's who was it? It was Mike Johnson right who was like oh was Trump actually an agent or was he doing something for the government? I mean, look, I don't mind if stuff is redacted for classified purposes. I I actually raised in this this video I did yesterday my concern that that 15 days that the DOJ has or the attorney general has to present to Congress. My fear, Allison, is Pamela Joe waits until the very end of that rolling production. So, we don't get it from the 15 days from December 19th, the explanation of what was withheld and redacted. we actually get it whenever the hell this ends. And

according to Blanch, it's going to take at least a few more weeks to be able to even go through the documents.

Yeah. And honestly, I did the math. At the current rate of release, they're going to be releasing these documents if there are in fact a million more that they just happen to find uh up until like

like another 10 weeks or something, right? No, like mid 2031. Like there's so many documents. Um but you know, I don't know. It depends because they had a thousand people do it. It took them, you know, a bunch of overtime, a million dollars in overtime to go through about 300,000 pages. So they have 200 national security lawyers. That's a fifth of the amount of people they had to do the 300,000 pages. So, you know, just back of the envelope, it's going to be a while. Um, well, they were also looking for reinforcements. And remember, too, the DOJ has been gutted when it comes to lawyers and staff. I mean, those people are, you can't just have staff doing this. You have to have lawyers that are looking at it for purposes of privilege and all that other stuff. even though that is not a permissive redaction point. Let me be very clear. The law, the Epstein file transparency act doesn't allow for privilege redactions.

Doesn't allow for those things. So, when you've seen like I actually posted on social the other day, I was like they redacted the phone number for the fax machine at the Metropolitan Correction Center, the legal department's fax machine, and they've redacted names of prosecutors and other people that were not legally permissible redactions. And that really bothered me because it's one thing to air on the side of caution. It's a whole other thing to be redacting things that are not allowed to be removed. Yeah. Well, I tell you why I think it's in the national security lawyer's hands and and not just because Eisenberg is friendly to omitting things from documents that uh he doesn't want people to see and hiding them in code word classified systems, but Donald Trump's excuse for everything. Ever since the Supreme Court, remember when the Supreme Court said, "You have to talk about how to facilitate the return

of Kilar Brego Garcia to the United States." Facilitate. Exactly. But they put a sentence in there that said, "But the but the courts must show due regard and deference to the president when it comes to national security issues." And ever since that sentence was written in that decision, the Trump administration has been like everything that they don't want to talk about is national security. The agreement with Bouquet, national security. Me building the east wing with the bunker underneath, national security. You can't stop me. Me deporting people to third countries, national security. Me trying to use the Alien Enemies Act to disappear people to Al Salvador and Ziko prison. National security. Everything's national security. And I think that that he can see the writing on the wall and people are going to ask why so many things are being withheld even if she doesn't start the 15-day clock until the entire

rolling production is done. so that he can say national security. That's why I've redacted these things.

Well, and we also know that Jay Clayton at the the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, again, no coincidences, the office that purportedly just quote unquote stumbled over a million more documents that they just turned over to to to main justice. You know, there's allegedly some investigation that has been ordered by Pamela Joe Bondi to be conducted concerning Democrats solely as it relates to Epstein and the Epstein files. So, that was, if you look at the law, the idea of an active criminal and pending investigation was grounds for redactions and withholdings. And so, I also suspect that's going to be provided by uh Pamela Joe as an excuse as to why some of these things weren't turned over as well.

Yeah. And and one last thing I wanted to tell you, I'm in in touch with a a source who wants to, you know, remain anonymous for obvious reasons that is a document storage expert at information management division. And I asked,

"What would it take? How explain to me how you would lose 400 banker boxes of documents?" Because a million pages is roughly 400 bankers boxes.

That's crazy. And the person like I said who wishes to rem remain anonymous um you know said well it would be very unlikely.

Yeah. The only innocent explanation is that all 400 boxes were scanned into the system on the same day and there was some massive glitch where nothing from that day made it into the digital inventory and none of the audits that generally take place to check the scanned inventory were completed. Because even in that scenario, because [snorts] of the audits, the error would have been caught immediately and quickly corrected. In fact, Katie, I was told that if you wanted if you lost 400 boxes of documents, you would have to lose them on purpose.

You would have to be hiding them. So the million documents was either hidden through malfeasants and discovered later because everyone was looking through for them or it's a it's a BS thing that doesn't exist at all.

Well, think about the rock and the hard place. If they actually gave a which we know they don't, Allison, the DOJ finds itself, right? Or the federal government kind of at large. You either and I love I always love the word malfeasants although in this regard I think it veers so strongly into the land of criminal intent like spfoliation of evidence type of like let's just get rid of the evidence right um so it's either malfeasants intent specific intent to hide this stuff right until you got your ass busted or you're so negligent or incompetent that you can also rise to the level of being criminally negligent and criminally incompetent. I mean, it's like either one makes you look bad. And again, that presupposes they actually care, although I think they should because as I said, you know, you had a near unanimous support for this absent one person who said no in the House, but across the

board in Congress, you had near unanimous consent on this law. So I would be stunned to see a lack of energy going into a demand for explanations behind what is happening here. And the the stupidity behind all this too, Alison, is this rolling production which is some which is otherwise okay in litigation, right? But this rolling production that is happening right now just keeps it in the media cycle over and over and over again. And so to your point, if it takes them that long to get through a million documents, we'll be dealing with Epstein files production through November of 2026,

right? I mean, we'll be dealing with this through the midterms. And and this is one of those things that will never go away because once actually everything and even then I don't believe it'll always be everything that's out there, which is the most horrific thing, right? Like if you're a victim or survivor, the fact that this could be hanging over your head, this idea that not all of it is out there just cheats them of justice. I think and true accountability. But like if you if you think about it, this is one of those things where when the information does come out cuz also remember we're still getting stuff from the Epstein estate as well. Financials there subpoena ducy subpoenas ducy's tikum that were served on financial institutions. Think about all the different threads that we can continue to pull just to show what wasn't done before, what wasn't chased down before and people who care enough

to do it. And this is us, right? This is you and I, two independent female journalists on a holiday, Saturday or excuse me, Sunday, December 28th, right? Like we're doing this like because we care. You can imagine like how many people are also going to approach somebody like you that's trusted that they know will bring this to light and protect them, you know, as well. I mean, that's a big deal in my mind. This is one of those things that's just not going to go away.

No. Right. And and before I let you go, I just have to tell you that uh one of the sources I spoke to wanted to remind us um that [sighs] if you were gonna hide a million documents, uh if that if that is something that somebody wanted to do, it was this would have been around the time frame when people at the New York FBI field office were in cahoots with Rudy Giuliani to release the Weiner laptop and the Hillary emails uh in an effort to forced Jim Comey to reopen the case. So, there were a lot of very proTrump, anti-Hillary FBI agents in the New York field office at that time. So, I don't know. Um, it's just something to think about. It's a it's it's one of of three possibilities um here and all of them mean that Todd Blanch is lying. So, um,

I was going to say the common denominator through all of this concerning Blanch and Pamela Joe is the lies. You sit on a throne of lies. It's like that's what really bothered me, right? I kept on like going through all these documents and I'm like, wait, wait, we can go this far back and if we keep on going farther and farther back, we see these representations made. And the funny thing is they want to embrace this kind of public forward-f facing And if they only learned their lesson and if they were circumspect right about how they as federal officials deal with the public and if they weren't like uh Dan Bingo Boingo Bonino and everybody racing in Cash Fatel I'll meet you in Vajala like if you know like if they weren't racing to be all out there in social media as is Pam Bondi you know they probably would not be it wouldn't be those this obvious right they wouldn't be so busted although candidly this would all come

out one way or another you'd think and you'd think that they would know the massive public interest. But uh I have to tell you in my in my foil lawsuit, I've I've sued the government department of justice to get those training videos for the reduction.

They finally responded. Their reason for not for for opposing my expedited processing of those videos. Their actual reason, Katie, is that there is not widespread public interest in the Epstein matter. That's their actual argument that I failed to show. So bad faith. It's almost laughable how bad faith that is.

We'll see what Judge Barrel Howal says about it. Katie, thank you so much for joining me today.

Oh, we love We love Judge Barl How, by the way. Yes, we do. Oh, no. Thank you. Thank you for this amazing amazing breaking news. It just it just Listen, it just makes us feel better that the more we push this, the more people are willing to come forward and verify and corroborate what we're what we're putting out there.

Yeah, I agree. It's It's always good to see you, my friend. and I hope you have a wonderful new year.

Happy new year, my friend. All right, everybody. Thanks for watching the breakdown. I know we weren't supposed to be here. I know we were supposed to take that day off, but I really wanted to get that breaking news to you. And thanks again to my friend and colleague here at the Midas Touch Network, Katie Fang. There's a lot of other news that happened this week, and you can catch it all on the Daily Beans podcast wherever you get your podcast. So, thanks so much for watching the breakdown.

Katie Fang here. We launched the Katy Fang News Channel in partnership with the Midas Touch Network so we could bring you the latest in legal and political news. Straight no chaser. So if you're a fellow trutht teller, hit that subscribe button and share the word about this channel so we can build a highinformation America together.

New Midas merch. Head to store.midestouch.com today and get yourself the best pro-democracy gear and show your support. That's store.midestouch.com.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING"?

Katie Fang (Guest), Allison Gil (Guest), Dan Bongino (Guest), Thomas Massie (Guest), Matt Gaetz (Guest).

What is "🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING" about?

FBI whistleblowers are revealing information about what Donald Trump may be concealing in the Epstein files, with insights from independent reporters Allison Gil and Katie Fang. Tensions escalate as former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino criticizes Congressman Thomas Massie’s efforts to release these files, while also engaging in a public feud with fellow political figures.

What is mentioned in this MeidasTouch episode?

2 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Department of Justice, Donald Trump. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "🚨FBI Whistleblowers TELL MEIDAS WHAT Trump IS HIDING"?

The episode runs 33 min; the transcript is about 5,869 words in 58 timestamped sections.

More from MeidasTouch

About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated January 24, 2026.