DOJ scrutinized by Democrats over claims of Epstein files ‘spying’ 

What this episode is about

The Department of Justice faces criticism from House Democrats over allegations of surveillance on lawmakers viewing unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, which they claim constitutes a violation of the separation of powers. The scrutiny intensified following a contentious hearing where evidence of tracking Congresswoman Jayapal's search history was reportedly presented, raising concerns about accountability for Epstein's crimes and the treatment of survivors.

Key takeaways

• When Congress surveils Congress, the only thing outraged is the separation of powers in the air.
• A piece of paper titled 'Jayapal's Search History'—the DOJ might need a better PR team.
• Survivors raise hands, while justice seems to be hiding in plain sight—talk about ironic.
• Bondi's refusal to apologize? The only thing getting ‘unredacted’ here is accountability.
• Oversight or snooping? Who knew the DOJ turned congressional privacy into a real-life episode of 'Surveillance Nation'?

Who speaks in this episode?

• Pramila Jayapal (Guest) · 9 min speaking
• Catherine (Guest) · 2 min speaking

What is discussed, and when

1. 0:00 – 3:00: Attorney General Pam Bondi, Jeffrey Epstein, Pramila Jayapal, Department of Justice
2. 3:00 – 6:00: Pramila Jayapal, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Department of Justice, House Judiciary Committee
3. 6:00 – 9:00: Department of Justice, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Jeffrey Epstein
4. 9:00 – 11:41: ICE, CBP, Pramila Jayapal

Notable quotes from "DOJ scrutinized by Democrats over claims of Epstein files ‘spying’ "

• I did confirm to him that was my search history, that she had it in the binder, that there's a photograph of it, that it matched what I searched.

  about Pramila Jayapal · at 1:08

• Attorney General Bondi, you apologize to the survivors in your opening statement for what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein.

  about Attorney General Pam Bondi · at 2:14

• She serves on the House Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, and Budget Committees.

  about House Judiciary Committee · at 3:07

• And the only thing is... Congresswoman, And the only thing is, it's already so funded ICE and CBP that it's not going to make that much of an impact on their current operations.

  about ICE · at 9:04

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

• Pramila Jayapal — Person · Main guest; lawmaker raising oversight allegations · 4 mentions · first at 0:24
  Interviewee and key complainant alleging DOJ surveillance of lawmakers' search history when reviewing unredacted Epstein files; presses for survivor outreach and accountability.
• Attorney General Pam Bondi — Person · Referenced official; target of criticism/oversight · 6 mentions · first at 0:15
  Named as Attorney General receiving a letter demanding DOJ stop alleged surveillance; criticized for conduct in a hearing and for not engaging survivors.
• Jeffrey Epstein — Person · Referenced subject of investigation/crimes · 5 mentions · first at 0:09
  Central figure in the discussion of the 'Epstein files,' survivor accountability, and alleged DOJ actions related to access and redactions.
  Violation of the separation of powers and quote further evidence that this DOJ will stop at nothing to protect Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's co-conspirators…
• Ghislain Maxwell — Person · Referenced alleged co-conspirator/associate · 2 mentions · first at 0:36
  Mentioned alongside Epstein as part of the alleged network of 'co-conspirators, accomplices, and enablers' discussed in the letter and broader accountability push.
  Violation of the separation of powers and quote further evidence that this DOJ will stop at nothing to protect Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's co-conspirators…

Companies & orgs

• Department of Justice — Company · Government agency under scrutiny · 6 mentions · first at 2:03
  Central to the controversy over surveillance of Congress members and handling of Epstein files
  And Garcia called the surveillance a blatant violation of the separation of powers and quote further evidence that this DOJ will stop at nothing to protect Jeffrey Epstein and…
• House Judiciary Committee — Company · Congressional committee · 1 mention · first at 4:51
  Congresswoman Jayapal's affiliation, central to the oversight of DOJ
• ICE — Company · Immigration enforcement agency · 4 mentions · first at 9:00
  Discussed in the context of funding expiration and operational impacts
• CBP — Company · Border protection agency · 3 mentions · first at 9:41
  Mentioned alongside ICE in discussions about immigration enforcement and funding
  And the only thing is... Congresswoman, And the only thing is, it's already so funded ICE and CBP that it's not going to make that much of an impact on their current operations.

Full transcript with timestamps

0:01 good evening and welcome back to the weekend WE'RE GOING TO GIN THIS HOUR WITH TRUMP'S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BATTLING ALLEGATIONS THAT IT HAS BEEN CATALOGING THE SEARCH HISTORY OF LAWMAKERS WHO WERE ABLE TO VIEW UNREDACTED EPSTEIN FILES THIS WEEK. IT COMES AS A TRIO OF HOUSE DEMOCRATS sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi demanding that the Justice Department stop what they called spying on Congress members reviewing unredacted Epstein files. In the letter, Congresswoman Jayapal and Congressman Raskin and Garcia called the surveillance a blatant violation of the separation of powers and quote further evidence that this DOJ will stop at nothing to protect Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's co-conspirators, accomplices, and enablers, while denying justice to survivors and the American people.

0:46 The explosive letter comes after the combative hearing with Bondi this week, where she was photographed with a record of Congresswoman Jayapal's search history of the unredacted Epstein documents. The piece of paper was literally titled Jayapal Pramila search history. Jayapal confronted Speaker Johnson about the situation. Look at purpose. I did confirm to him that that was my search history, that she had it in the binder, that there's a photograph of it, that it matched what I searched and that it was unacceptable.

1:19 I don't think it's appropriate for anybody to be tracking that so I will echo that to anybody involved with the DOJ and I'm sure it was an oversight, that's my guess. The THE NEW REVELATIONS COME AS SURVIVORS CONTINUE PUSHING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY OVER THE CRIMES OF EPSTEIN AND HIS ACCOMPLICES, AND DURING BONDI'S HEARING, A POWERFUL MOMENT WITH SURVIVORS IN ATTENDANCE BECAME A FLASHPOINT FOR HOW FAR that justice feels for those who've been abused. Watch. To the survivors in the room, if you are willing, please stand.

1:56 And if you are willing, please raise your hands if you have still not been able to meet with this Department of Justice. Please know for the record that every single survivor has raised their hand. Attorney General Bondi, you apologize to the survivors in your opening statement for what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Will you turn to them now? And apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of of the Epstein files and their information.

2:48 Congresswoman, you set before SET IN THIS CHAIR TWICE. ATTORNEY GENERAL BONDI, CAN I FINISH MY ANSWER? NO, I'M GOING TO RECLAIM MY TIME. I'M NOT GOING TO GET IN THE GUTTER FOR HER THEATRICS. And Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal joins us now. She serves on the House Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, and Budget Committees. Congresswoman, thanks for coming back on the show. So much to dig into there. I guess let me, I actually want to go back to what we heard Speaker Johnson say there when he seemed to suggest when asked by a reporter there in the hallway, you know, that this was probably inappropriate, but probably just an oversight.

3:30 Is that how you see it? The fact that your search history ended up there for all to see? No, definitely not. It's not an oversight. Um, I've spoken with him twice now. Um, you know, look, I think that they are deliberately searching, saving the searches of, and then printing out the searches of members of Congress to use against them in hearings. This is surveillance and its utilization of that surveillance to try to attack members of Congress who

4:17 are not going to be able for him to say this and criticize the Department of Justice, I'll say. But it is so egregious. And I believe that Republicans and Democrats know that. So we are continuing to pursue, first of all, an end to the practice of spying and surveilling members of Congress. And, you know, that means a whole new process for how we get to search and what they, you know, essentially saying they are not a lot to track any of that. It also, though, requires them to answer a bunch of questions, requires Pam Bondi to answer a bunch of questions that I have, which we put in the letter that we just sent her.

4:53 How much, how many members are they surveilling? Did they, keep that search history for every single one of us? How many of them is that? And also, why did they do it? Why did she come in? Look, that, that search history required staff to not only save the search history, but then to go back and summarize what the search history was? Because if you look at that picture, it has the document number that I searched by. And then a summary of what the email was. And I was in there for about two hours. So that document is stapled because there are a number of pieces of paper in there.

5:31 And I want to know also, how was she going to use it against me? I don't care There's nothing in there that I want to hide about my searches. But she was going to use that to try and attack me. That is completely inappropriate instead of answering the questions of why she's covering up this entire scandal and redacting the wrong information of powerful predators and then not redacting the information of survivors. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember, Congresswoman, when Republican lawmakers voted to give themselves financial recourse because they were so mad that their phone records were being subpoenaed.

6:06 But that's neither here nor there. I did want to ask you about that very powerful moment during the hearing when you asked Pam Bondi to apologize to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and she refused to look them in the face as they indicated they raised their hands indicating that they had not heard from the DOJ. Have you been in touch with the survivors and are there any updates as to whether any of them have been contacted by the Department of Justice to tell their story and to be interviewed presumably about what's in those files or what's been left out?

6:42 Catherine, that moment still gives me chills. When I watched it, I felt chills again because it was a very, very powerful moment. And I worked very closely with the survivors ahead of time. I didn't want them to be a prop in this I wanted to know what it was that they wanted from her in being there because that in itself is a very courageous thing to do to sit in that room and essentially listen to her basically re-traumatize them by refusing to offer an apology, by refusing to even engage on a human level with them to just turn around and apologize to them.

7:16 So I was ready and I had told them, listen, if I ask you to stand, that's why I said if you're willing and you don't feel like it, please don't stand. This is about you and protecting you. I have spoken to them since and my understanding, obviously not all of them, but my understanding is that they have not received any outreach from the Department of Justice. And I think it just, you know, look, I knew that I was in a way tossing her a softball by offering her the opportunity to turn around and apologize to them if she had taken it, it would have been a very powerful moment.

7:50 And I would have said this is a very powerful moment for the country to see you apologize. And will you now agree to meet with them? But she didn't, you know, she didn't take it in that way at all. She was performing for an audience of one and the really awful criminal thing. And I do think it's, it's criminal in the greater scheme of things is that there is a criminal ring here of predators and pedophiles that has systematically abused, raped groomed uh assaulted young girls as young as nine, 10. When you look through those files, it is impossible not to have those emails haunt you.

8:28 And instead of being responsive to that and being the people's lawyer, she disrespected them. She told them what people have been telling them for the last 20, 30 years in some cases. Shut up, sit down, be silent. We are not going to do anything about this. And furthermore, we're going to try to intimidate you by releasing the names of survivors in opposition to the law. And to what the Department of Justice should be doing to protect them. Congresswoman, I want to shift quickly to the shutdown. Funding for DHS expired at midnight.

9:04 And the only thing is... Congresswoman, And the only thing is, it's already so funded ICE and CBP that it's not going to make that much of an impact on their current operations. What are you and other Democrats going to hold out for in the name of concrete reform and change? And do you worry that this is going to put stress on other parts of DHS that are unrelated to Trump's immigration crackdown? Well, we've been very clear, Elise, about our demands. Look, ice needs to get out of Minnesota but also other cities across the country.

9:41 We don't want them just pulling out ice and CBP agents from Minnesota and then sending them elsewhere. We need to make sure that there are no more warrantless arrests, and that is not only at the doors, which is constitutionally prohibited, you know, to bash down somebody's door without a judicial warrant, but also all of this arrests that are being made on the street, people being dragged out by their hair stopped because of how they look or what language they speak. That has to stop. We need judicial warrants there as well.

10:10 And we need a change to how these folks are, you know, are not identified. We need them to not have masks and to, you know, make sure they are wearing, identifying information and that they are prosecuted. So there's a number of things that we've listed right now, 73,000 immigrants are being incarcerated in for-profit facilities every single day, including children, children. There have been a number of reports about the children that are being incarcerated in these facilities against the law. And so that

10:59 we're going to, we're going to use the of government and DHS because they refuse to follow the Constitution, judges orders and want ICE and CBP to continue murdering people on the streets with no accountability. That is on them. But we're going to, we're going to use the little little bit of leverage we have to really hold out for these kinds of major reforms. Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, thank you.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "DOJ scrutinized by Democrats over claims of Epstein files ‘spying’ "?

Pramila Jayapal (Guest), Catherine (Guest).

What is "DOJ scrutinized by Democrats over claims of Epstein files ‘spying’ " about?

The Department of Justice faces criticism from House Democrats over allegations of surveillance on lawmakers viewing unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, which they claim constitutes a violation of the separation of powers. The scrutiny intensified following a contentious hearing where evidence of tracking Congresswoman Jayapal's search history was reportedly presented, raising concerns about…

What is mentioned in this MS NOW episode?

8 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Pramila Jayapal, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Department of Justice, Jeffrey Epstein, House Judiciary Committee, ICE. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "DOJ scrutinized by Democrats over claims of Epstein files ‘spying’ "?

The episode runs 12 min; the transcript is about 1,803 words in 18 timestamped sections.

More from MS NOW

• All analyzed episodes
• Books mentioned on MS NOW
• People mentioned on MS NOW
• Topics mentioned on MS NOW