Transcript
The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis
From Glenn Beck · Episode page · Watch on YouTube
· 14 min · 1,940 words · 17 timestamped sections
This is the full, timestamped transcript of "The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis", an episode of Glenn Beck published December 26, 2025 (14 min, about 1,940 words). It mentions 3 people, works and ideas, including Donald Trump, Elon Omar, Venezuela.
What this episode is about
The discussion revolves around Donald Trump's controversial statements regarding Afghan and Somali refugees, where he suggests a connection between immigration and crime without presenting evidence. The conversation highlights concerns about security, calls for stricter vetting processes, and critiques of perceived political responses to these immigration issues.
Key takeaways
- Security requires clarity, not cruelty; the Constitution can guide us if we choose to read it.
- We don’t need new laws, just the courage to enforce the ones that exist—our Bill of Rights is still viable.
- Judge character, not identity; actions reveal true intent—an idea as old as civil rights yet often forgotten.
- Islamism isn't a religion; it's a political ideology that threatens freedoms. We need to differentiate for true safety.
- Deporting the action, not the identity is crucial—the real battle is against extremism, not a whole faith.
Who speaks in this episode?
- Glenn Beck (Guest) · 13 min speaking
What is discussed, and when
- – 3:00: Donald Trump, Elon Omar
- – 12:00: Venezuela
Notable quotes from "The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis"
Asked what Somali had to do with the Afghan suspect, Mr. Trump said, Nothing, but Somalians have caused a lot of trouble. They're ripping us off of a lot of money. This led him to criticize Representative Elon Omar, blah.
about Donald Trump · atWe either stay America American or we lose everything. I'm going to get to Venezuela here in a second because that's that's what they're claiming right now. We're not being American.
about Venezuela · at
Who and what is mentioned in this episode?
People
- Donald Trump — Person · Referenced political figure (subject of critique/defense) · 1 mention · first at
Central referenced figure in a discussion about refugees, vetting, deportation, and constitutional limits; the speaker reacts to reporting about Trump's comments on Afghans and Somalis and uses it to pivot into a broader argument about enforcing existing law without violating constitutional rights. - Elon Omar — Person · Referenced politician (target of Trump's criticism) · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as a U.S. Representative criticized by Trump in the cited reporting; functions as a concrete example within the segment’s debate over immigration, refugees, and political rhetoric.Asked what Somali had to do with the Afghan suspect, Mr. Trump said, Nothing, but Somalians have caused a lot of trouble. They're ripping us off of a lot of money. This led him to criticize Representative Elon Omar, blah.
Places & events
- Venezuela — Place · Setting · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned in the context of claims about not following the Constitution, indicating a geopolitical reference point in the discussion.
Full transcript with timestamps
There was a story um in the New York Times that I just I I find fascinating. Uh Donald Trump, you know, is uh is casting suspicion on refugees according to the New York Times. President Trump claims there are a lot of problems with Afghans without providing any evidence. I mean, does he have to provide the evidence on that? I mean, I think it's pretty darn clear uh that we're we're having some real problems, especially this weekend. We have three people arrested. We had two people shot in Washington DC. Then we had somebody in Dallas that uh was caught making bombs.
Same thing Afghani. And I thought there was a third one as well. I mean, you know, it's kind of, you know, it's kind of out there. Um but uh nope. Nope. Uh and then they said he jumped right on the Somali thing, disparaging the Somali community. And uh well, okay. Okay. Well, uh, when a reporter pointed out that according to officials, the suspect had worked with the CIA, therefore it would have been vetted, Mr. Trump said he went nuts. I mean, he went nuts, blah, blah, blah. Jumping on the subject of the Somali refugees in Minnesota, he said, "The population was taking over that state, bringing gang violence."
Asked what Somali had to do with the Afghan suspect, Mr. Trump said, "Nothing, but Somalians have caused a lot of trouble. They're ripping us off of a lot of money." This led him to criticize Representative Elon Omar, blah blah blah. H then he you know then they go on and say well he just wants to deport everybody. No no no that's not what he saying. I mean is it really that unreasonable to say we want to know who is here and if you're causing a problem you shouldn't be here. I mean I I don't know why that is so controversial today.
I guess maybe because nobody knows how to do it. You know well he's going to become a tyrant. Well, you don't have to become a tyrant to do that. I mean, that's that's the biggest lie that, you know, to defeat a tyrant, you have to become the tyrant. That's that's what happens in every revolution except for the American Revolution. And it's wrong and it's always been wrong. But, you know, only America really has, you know, gotten that in the past. But if we fall into that trap again, you know, if we fall into that lie now, then, you know, an Islamist doesn't have to destroy our constitution. They're they're we'll do it for them. we'll be done. So, you want to defend the republic? What do you say we do it the American way?
I mean, it's really not that hard. We have to defend oursel, right? But do it constitutionally. And if we don't do it constitutionally, then isn't everything really really hollow? If if we do it, George Bush, I I abandon the free market to save the free market, there's no free market. And we're seeing that now. Look how free our market is. Thank you, George Bush. You can't violate it to save it. It doesn't work that way. You know, there's some principles that you have to live by. And the first one is security begins with clarity.
Clarity, not cruelty. The Constitution demands something from us. You have to distinguish between peaceful Muslims and political Islamists. We're a safe harbor for the persecuted, but we're not a staging ground for the persecutors. And that's what's happening. You persecuted have come in along with the persecutors. So the question is not how do we remove all these Muslims? That's bigotry. The question is how do we remove the Islamists? That's a political movement that rejects our constitution, our laws, our civilization, everything else. You judge a person. This is this is going to be crazy in today's world, not by their identity, but the content of their character, meaning their actions.
This is the foundation of every constitutional tool we possess. The next principle, we don't we have the existing law. We don't need more laws to enforce it. Okay? We we got them. We don't need new powers. We don't need new surveillance. You know, we don't need to shred the Bill of Rights. Everything we need already written, black and white on paper. Material support for terrorism, illegal affiliation with designated foreign extremist groups, illegal advocacy of political violence, not protected speech, immigration, visa fraud, felonies, foreign funding of domestic political movements, prohibited charity funds, money laundering, encrypted remittances.
All of this stuff can be prosecuted. calling for the overthrow of the Constitution. I don't know. Deportable if you're not a non if you're a if you're a non-citizen. We don't we don't need any new laws. We just need to watch the actions and go, "Yep, you out." We need courage of the people. And this is not going to happen in Minnesota. You need courage from the politicians who are in charge. Use the laws you already have. The third principle is the first amendment protects religion. religion, not political tyranny masquerading as religion.
The Constitution says, "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of reli religion or uh prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Beautiful, sacred essential except the same constitution says no one has the right to impose religious law on others. No one has the right to incite violence. No one has the right to overthrow the republic. Islamism is not a religion. That's political using religious symbols. You know, if you want to say the Ku Klux Clan is Christian, you can go ahead and say it all you want. But Christians know Klux Clan is not Christian. Only non-Christians think that that's Christian. People who hate Christianity.
The same thing with Islamism. If you're an Islamist, you're not a Muslim. And you know who knows that? Actual Muslims. First Amendment protects your right to worship. It doesn't protect your right to destroy the rights of others. And that distinction is constitutional gold. Why aren't we enforcing that? Why are we why are we afraid to say that out loud? Why won't anybody say it to each other? Why are you afraid to say this? How about this one? The fourth principle. Deportation is legal. Deportation is moral. Deportation is necessary as a tool. We are generous.
Our our record is very very clear. There's never been a more generous uh country than the United States. But generosity is not suicide. If a non-citizen praises jihad, supports Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS, Islamic jihad, advocates for Sharia law, lies on their immigration forms, I don't know, marries their brother, laers money to foreign terror groups, attends foreign funded mosque tied to extremist networks, rejects the Constitution, or publicly calls for violence. I don't know. I don't need a single new law. that person has forfeited the privilege of being a citizen and remaining here. It's not a punishment. It's not a punishment.
That's self-defense. Why is it we won't stand up for our own way of life and our own children? Immigration is not a right. I know they're trying to make it that there are no borders. Yes, there are borders. There are. Citizenship is not a right. Constitutional order is a right and that right we have to defend. Thank God we're already doing one of these things. The fifth principle we're looking at the money river. Damn the money rivers. No Islamist movement grows without Qatari funding, Turkish political machinery, Iranian revolutionary guard money. Muslim Brotherhood, NGO fronts, charity fraud, shadow remittances, crypto transfers.
Cut the financing and you'll starve the beasts. This is not profiling. This is called forensic accounting. And this is exactly how we brought down the mafia, um MS-13, the ISIS network, cartel pipelines. That's how you do it. You follow the money and the constitution and everything seems to work out. But everybody is concentrating on force. Force. Force. He's going to use force. He's going to use force. Why? The strongest weapon we have is not force. It It's the alliance that we have with everyone who fled here because they were getting away from the ideology. We're now saying we should fight the Muslim reformers, the Iranian dissident, the Yuzidis, the Coptic Christians, the Lebanese Democrats, the Kurds, the moderate Muslims. These are the people that Islamists fear most because they expose the lie. They know they were there. When they stand beside us, and they're begging to, by the way,
the entire narrative collapses. The word Islamophobia crumbles into dust. Really? You're calling them? Really, the moral high ground is ours again constitutionally spiritually and historically. The Constitution is a shield. Why? Why do we refuse to use it? We should proudly use it as a shield. Take this one thought with you. We defend the Constitution not by weakening it, but by applying it fully, fearlessly, and without exception. That means you can't racial profile, no religious bans, no collective guilt, no compromise on freedom, no surrender of rights. But it also means this. No tolerance for political movements that seek to destroy the Constitution. No sanctuary for foreign funded Islamist networks or any other kind of foreign funded uh network that cares to take down the Constitution or destroy America. No free pass for those who advocate tyranny. No apology for defending our civilization. This is the
balance that our founders struck. That was it. It seems so easy, but for some reason we find it so hard. We either stay America American or we lose everything. I'm going to get to Venezuela here in a second because that's that's what they're claiming right now. We're not being American. We're not following the Constitution. Well, I'd like some evidence of that. We we either claim America and and use our constitution or we lose everything. We don't defeat Islamism by becoming the mirror image of the thing we fight. We defeat it by being the thing that the Islamists fear the most. A nation of free individuals governed by laws, protected by rights, anchored in moral truths and the rights that come from God.
We become a nation that is unafraid to defend itself. If you do that and you follow the Constitution with courage, then America will be what it always has been, a refuge for the for the oppressed, a graveyard for tyrannies, and the last best hope that a world desperately needs. Are we too timid? Are we too tired? the hour is late and I'm telling you it is you're just seeing if you paid attention at all to the news this weekend things are speeding up. I told you a few months ago we've changed seasons. It's coming and it's coming fast.
What are you hanging on to? A political party? A politician? Anger? Vengeance? What? I'll hang on to God and I'll hang on to the Constitution. That's the greatest document ever written by the hand of man. And it's calling on you right now to rise. Not as a mob, not as a tribe, but as Americans that know the difference between right and wrong, truth and fiction. And you'll stand you'll stand up for it, not without any without any hatred. I dismiss you. You You're an Islamophobe. Really? Am I? Good for you. It's cute, but it doesn't work because all I'm asking is to follow the Constitution because I think this country is worth standing up for.
Questions about this episode
Who speaks in "The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis"?
Glenn Beck (Guest).
What is "The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis" about?
The discussion revolves around Donald Trump's controversial statements regarding Afghan and Somali refugees, where he suggests a connection between immigration and crime without presenting evidence. The conversation highlights concerns about security, calls for stricter vetting processes, and critiques of perceived political responses to these immigration issues.
What is mentioned in this Glenn Beck episode?
3 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Donald Trump, Elon Omar, Venezuela. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.
How long is "The BEST WAY to REVERSE this immigration crisis"?
The episode runs 14 min; the transcript is about 1,940 words in 17 timestamped sections.
More from Glenn Beck
About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated January 26, 2026.