Transcript

IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!

From I've Had It · Episode page · Watch on YouTube

· 17 min · 2,647 words · 23 timestamped sections

This is the full, timestamped transcript of "IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!", an episode of I've Had It published February 11, 2026 (17 min, about 2,647 words). It mentions 10 people, works and ideas, including Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Department of Justice, Jamie Raskin, Caroline Levit.

What this episode is about

The main topic centers around allegations that Donald Trump appears extensively in unredacted Epstein files, with Congressman Jamie Rascin asserting that over one million references to Trump have been concealed from the public. The discussion highlights concerns regarding systemic failures in investigating sexual trafficking cases and questions the accountability of legal institutions in addressing high-profile instances of abuse.

Key takeaways

  • When a president's name appears in Epstein files a million times, are we napping on accountability?
  • If the DOJ ignored a cabal of electricians, how would the narrative shift? Justice wears blinders for billionaires.
  • The Epstein saga isn't just a crime story; it's a chilling reflection of a two-tiered justice system.
  • As we obscure the truth for powerful men, when will we finally listen to the victims' cries for justice?
  • If systemic injustice were a sport, America would be winning gold medals for covering up powerful predators.

Who speaks in this episode?

What is discussed, and when

  1. – 3:00: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Department of Justice, Jamie Raskin
  2. – 6:00: Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Department of Justice, Caroline Levit
  3. – 9:00: Caroline Levit
  4. – 12:00: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Caroline Levit, Chuck Schumer
  5. – 15:00: Chuck Schumer
  6. – 17:02: Jeffrey Epstein

Notable quotes from "IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!"

  • Underway. And it happens to be the president of the United States, which has now been revealed by Jamie Rascin via Axios. Kylie popped this up.
    about Jamie Raskin · at
  • And the president of the United States is in these files over one million times. And my question is this. Number one, where is QAnon? Number two, it's infuriating to me and eyeopening to.
    about Donald Trump · at
  • Another one and another one and another one. And I it just infuriates me to no end that Merrick Garland didn't investigate the alleged quote suicide of Jeffrey Epstein. When…
    about Merrick Garland · at
  • Jail for these crimes. Yet, we know there are four co-conspirators that are being protected by the Department of Justice.
    about Department of Justice · at
  • Chuckles strongly worded tweet. And yet another radical move. Trump's EPA is set to reverse essentially all greenhouse gas regulations. every single community in America will pay the price. It will hurt kids with asthma. It will hurt.
    about Jeffrey Epstein · at
  • Well, and where's the urgency? I have not seen Chuck Schumer talk about what he can do as the Senate minority leader with this Epstein with Trump being in the Epstein files over a million times.
    about Chuck Schumer · at

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

  • Donald Trump — Person · Primary referenced political figure / subject of allegations · 4 mentions · first at
    Central target of the episode’s claims: alleged extensive presence in 'Epstein files,' alleged cover-up/redactions by his lawyers, and broader accusations of corruption and election interference.
  • Jeffrey Epstein — Person · Referenced alleged sex trafficker / focal figure of scandal · 7 mentions · first at
    Used as the anchor for claims about a sex trafficking network, alleged government cover-ups, and the circumstances of his death while in federal custody.
  • Jamie Raskin — Person · Referenced lawmaker / source of allegations · 2 mentions · first at
    Cited as the origin of the episode’s key allegation (via Axios) that Trump-related references were heavily redacted and that Trump appears extensively in unredacted Epstein files.
  • Caroline Levit — Person · Referenced administration spokesperson defending/deflecting · 3 mentions · first at
    Quoted giving the administration’s posture ('moving on') and defending Trump by framing an 'alleged FBI report' as corroborating Trump’s narrative.
    One million. One million times. Here's Caroline Levit on the administration's position on this issue.
  • Merrick Garland — Person · Referenced DOJ leader criticized for inaction · 2 mentions · first at
    Criticized for allegedly failing to investigate Epstein’s death and for broader DOJ inaction across administrations in the speaker’s framing.
  • Chuck Schumer — Person · Referenced opposition leader criticized for hypocrisy/inaction · 2 mentions · first at
    Discussed as an ineffective or hypocritical Democratic messenger; criticized for focusing on EPA messaging while allegedly lacking urgency on Epstein/Trump allegations and for pro-Israel donor politics (as claimed by speaker).
  • Gileain Maxwell — Person · Referenced convicted co-conspirator figure · 1 mention · first at
    Cited as the only person 'in jail for these crimes' in the speaker’s framing, used to argue that other alleged co-conspirators are being protected.
    Republican administrations. It's throughout the course of this because Galileain Maxwell is the only one in jail for these crimes. Yet, we know there are four co-conspirators that are being protected by the Department of Justice.

Companies & orgs

  • Department of Justice — Company · Government agency · 3 mentions · first at
    Criticized for its handling of the Epstein case and alleged cover-up of sex trafficking involving high-profile individuals.
  • Axios — Company · Media outlet · 1 mention · first at
    Cited as the source of revelations about Trump's involvement in the Epstein files.
    Underway. And it happens to be the president of the United States, which has now been revealed by Jamie Rascin via Axios. Kylie popped this up.

Concepts & topics

  • Obama administration — Concept · Historical context · 1 mention · first at
    Mentioned as the period when cases related to Epstein's sex trafficking ring began.
    It's infuriating to me and eyeopening to me that this these cases started in the Obama administration, transferred to Trump 1.0, transferred to Biden, transferred to Trump 2.0. And these girls have told us for a very long.

Full transcript with timestamps

The biggest cover up of a pedophile sex ring since the Catholic Church is underway. And it happens to be the president of the United States, which has now been revealed by uh Jamie Rascin via Axios. Kylie popped this up. Trump's personal lawyers, Bondie Blanch, and Patel, hid from American voters a minimum of 95% of all references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files. 950,000 of 1 million plus establishing the largest political cover up in American history. Trump is in the unredacted Epstein files more than a million times. Congressman Jamie Rascin alleges. And obviously, Congressman Jamie Rascin is not a liar.

He got hard drive of all of the files. And the president of the United States is in these files over one million times. And my question is this. Number one, where is QAnon? Number two, uh it's infuriating to me and eyeopening to me that this these cases started in the Obama administration, transferred to Trump 1.0, transferred to Biden, transferred to Trump 2.0. And these girls have told us for a very long time they were raped and they were trafficked. And we as a country and DOJ punted on this all of the time. And what does it take to believe people when they tell you, "I have been raped and trafficked." And then you get another one that has a very similar story and another one and another one and another one. And I it just infuriates me to no end that Merrick Garland didn't investigate the alleged quote suicide of Jeffrey Epstein. When you look at all of these men that were involved in this,

the richest, the two-tier system, the black and brown and poor people, they don't have this level of ability to to evade justice. And I think what if this were a cabal of sex trafficking electricians or plumbers? Would would the DOJ continue to allow it? What if this was black and brown communities that had this huge sex trafficking ring? Would the DOJ and the FBI ignored it? Because I don't think they would have because you look at the capital, everybody said, "Oh, well, you know, it was just a tur visit because everybody was white." Do you think they would have had more arrests and more outrage if it was black and brown people? Well, of course they would have. But the two-tier system of justice, it is not just in Republican administrations. It's throughout the course of this because Galileain Maxwell is the only one in jail for these crimes. Yet, we know there are four co-conspirators that are

being protected by the Department of Justice. And I would just say if they were black people that stormed the capital, they would have been shot. They they would have been shot. the backup would have been called and they would have all been shot. Period. Because that's what law enforcement has historically done uh to black people. It would have been a completely different playout. But here's Caroline Levit. Um I want to remind you, we started off this episode, her boss, one million times in the Epstein files. One million. One million times. Here's Caroline Levit on the administration's position on this issue.

Uh, and that remains true. And this call, if it did happen, corroborates exactly what President Trump has said from the beginning. And I'm sure many of you when you read that that alleged FBI report probably thought to yourself, "Wow, this really cracks our narrative that we've been trying to push about this president for many years." So, uh, we're moving on from that, Reagan. Uh, in that,

so they're moving on. They're moving on from this because he's guilty. Because he's in it, because Jeffrey Epstein's suicide was during his first term. And it's just really interesting to me that all of these people that bent the knee, that raced up to him, are all in the Epstein files. It's almost as if pumps, he was like, "Listen, I mean, we've evaded it. Merrick Garland didn't do [ __ ] on this thing for four years. we totally dodged a bullet. We've got to get back in there and bury these files. And it's almost like they all knew Howard let uh Lutnik has to go to the New York Post who was trying to do tons of cleanup. They were trying to clean up the whole thing for all of these people.

And the rot in this across so many different industries is so widespread. It's worse than a cabal. It is some of the most egregious uh depraved sexual depravity of uh women and girls that I've heard of since the Catholic Church. and the fact that this is in the government and then when you lump into this that Jeffrey Epstein was clearly my opinion a MSAD Asian and the Western media absolutely will not talk about his uh dealings with the government of Israel. So that's kind of screwed up. Clearly working with Russia as well. So it goes even beyond the sexual stuff because he was honeypottting people and blackmailing them and that's how he has all this money. So, it's obvious to me in my opinion, he was too dangerous and he knew too much and he knew where the bodies were buried, so somebody had him killed.

Well, there's no I mean, not trying to be a conspiracy theorist, but there's really no other conclusion that you can draw. In 2008, he got off pretty much scot-free. He checked in uh at night to the prison, then he gets, you know, arrested. And that was on the download. I don't know. I think that was a surprise to everybody in his inner circle that he was arrested. And then the fact that he died and was never able to name names. I just [ __ ] I just [ __ ] call [ __ ] on that. It's too convenient. They took the I'm sorry. No, no, I totally agree with you. Completely concur with that. Okay. So, while Caroline Levit and the White House are moving on,

I would think they're like, "Oh [ __ ] this is a problem." like you know these there's some bipartisan support and they are all gas no breaks on this thing. So in my opinion I've always seen this Trump 2.0 regime govern as though they're never going to face accountability. And I'm gravely concerned about the midterm elections and future elections in this country because the Republican party uh they tell you they're so pro-America, but they get their inspiration from uh governments like Hungary and governments like Turkey and governments like Russia.

While they tell you row rah rah we're pro- USA they don't get inspiration from the founding fathers and to make a quote more perfect union to fix mistakes to legislate a better government to provide more equality more justice no they look to dictatorships for inspiration CPAC turning point has their conventions in these twobit dictatorships so all of the things of these countries I'm talking about is they've rigged their elections and this is the Republican party's goal. Now, The Atlantic is reporting the following.

Election officials told us they are now getting ready for interference from both foreign adversaries and the White House. This is so stunning. that sentence getting ready for. We know foreign adversaries have been messing with our elections and algorithms as much as they can, but they're looking at election interference from the White House. So, as Caroline Love it said, "We're moving on." Rest assured, they're moving on to do everything in their power to prevent the incoming blue tsunami and trying to fix it and rig it.

Here's what I want to say, and this is super important. A lot of their talks about uh making it more difficult to vote are voter suppression tactics where people will just go, "Ah, I'm just going to descend into nihilism. It doesn't matter. They're rigged anyway." But they're also actively going to try to rig it. And this is where democracy has to be its most powerful. Every single one of us must vote. We must go. If you're a white person, you go hand in hand with black and brown people and you use your privilege, go with them to their precincts, escort them, be with them because that's where it's really going to rain down on them. And the turnout must be too big, too rig because they are going to do everything in their power to never face accountability for this. And as you can see with these Epstein files, it's every single person from the billionaires to the cabinet to our adversaries. Everybody's honeypotted

in this thing. And and and let's remember there is a video of Pam Bondi talking about really disgusting uh videos of leaders engaged in sex acts. This was a her having a uh lunch. I'm sure you've seen that video pumps where she talks about, oh, there's, you know, thousands of videos.

Yeah. And here's the thing. Are they allowing Congress to see those videos, these Congress people that are going to the FBI? Because we know they haven't released those publicly. And you and I have both thought what they're not releasing is even worse than what they are releasing. And here's the thing. When you think about the 2020 election and the stop the steel and the big lie and all the minations that Trump did to try to nullify that election on election night, he's like, "Stop the voting." He wanted to go in and take voting machines. He's going to do all that now.

Like all the stuff he said he was going to do, he's now going to do it. He's putting himself in a position to do that. He's taking paper ballots. He's handing over elect, you know, top election official jobs to election deniers. And these are the same people that went into court and had no evidence. But the propaganda that they have been lauding for years, some people will believe it. And and here's the thing, they've done everything they can. They've gerrymandered voter ID. Now they're going to surround uh voting stations with ICE per Steve Bannon.

Caroline Levit didn't rule it out. So they are putting every safeguard in so Donald Trump never has to leave, including but not limited to making this new ballroom impenetrable because it's a bucker. Scary [ __ ] All right. And then right now, the United States is ranked as the most corrupt it's ever been. Pop this up. The United States has fallen to its worst ever position in a leading global index that measures views of corruption in the public sector among independent experts and business people. So that can't be good. And let's see what the Democratic uh opposition is doing.

Chuckles strongly worded tweet. And yet another radical move. Trump's EPA is set to reverse essentially all greenhouse gas regulations. every single community in America will pay the price. It will hurt kids with asthma. It will hurt homeowners and destabilize insurance markets as extreme weather gets worse and it will send shock waves across the economy. So, here's my thing. Chuckles. When you say it will hurt kids, that's true, but you're just not a credible messenger in my book. Because a couple weeks ago you were talking to your AP pack donors and your Israeli donors and your pro-Israel packs and you were saying that one of the most important things you do in the Senate is make sure Israel gets every dime it can get.

The same Israel that's committing a genocide that is disproportionately killing kids. So, when you tell us that you give a [ __ ] about the EPA and those kids, which I think you probably do, but what I'm curious about is how do you cherrypick which kids to care about? Because for me, I care about all the kids. Palestinian when we were involved in the Iraq war. I oppose that war and I cared about the Iraqi kids. I care about kids here. I care about the kids that are being kidnapped and put into ice facilities that you and Hakee Jeff continue to play patty cake and be fascist collaborators and fund.

So spare me these tweets where you are morally duplicitous that you claim to care about American kids and American kids only when your votes show that you don't universally support children. you only do when it helps you. When you need all of this donor money and you're a big Israel thumper and you want to make sure that American kids schools and their lunches and their daycare and their healthcare are defunded and there's not enough money for these American kids to have it. You want to make sure all of it goes to Israel to kill Palestinian kids.

And then you get on Twitter and you think we're stupid. I agree with everything you say about Trump's EPA. You are just an expired noncredible messenger that needs to resign. This moment requires absolute moral clarity. Not moral duplicity. Not patty cakes with fascists. Not being a fascist collaborator. Not saying, "I'm great with killing kids here, but oh my god, Trump's poisoning the air and water. That's terrible. What about the kids with asthma? Oh, the kids with asthma in Palestine. Make sure Netanyahu gets a [ __ ] ton more bombs. Make sure we kill as many of them as possible. That's the message I get from you. So, you're not a credible messenger. You're a breathtaking hypocrite in my opinion.

You need to resign. You and the other senator from New York have uh done so much damage to the Democratic party and to the Democratic party messaging. It's just such a disgrace. Well, and where's the urgency? I have not seen Chuck Schumer talk about what he can do as the Senate minority leader with this Epstein with Trump being in the Epstein files over a million times. I maybe there's outrage that he is he has a plan on how to combat this and bring the hypocrisy and the transgressions to light. I haven't seen it, but I agree with you. Like you want to protect kids in the EPA, which is admirable. Yes, we need to do that. We need urgency on other matters that are happening day in and day out with regularity. And it continues to be just a lack of urgency I see from both minority leaderships and more than anything breathtaking hypocrisy. I mean it it it all I see from these people is breathtaking

hypocrisy that treats the electorate in the most patronizing fashion imaginable that we are supposed to just believe them blindly when their votes are one thing and their words are another thing and that when walking the walk and talking the talk are completely diametrically opposed to each other with each of these leaders Chuckles and Hakee. It's just like this is a massive moment. This is these people, the Trump regime, they are not [ __ ] around and you're [ __ ] around with them. Yeah, sure. Let's Yeah, you want to kill Americans? Yeah, let's put body cams on you while you do that. It's just It's utterly insane. And and by the way, they're both both of these people receive the same corporate donations from these pro-Israel packs that prefer Trump. So all we can do at that point is just conclude that they are straight up controlled opposition and that is not good enough for the electorate. All

right, like, subscribe, comment. We'll be back later.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!"?

Caroline Levit (Guest).

What is "IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!" about?

The main topic centers around allegations that Donald Trump appears extensively in unredacted Epstein files, with Congressman Jamie Rascin asserting that over one million references to Trump have been concealed from the public. The discussion highlights concerns regarding systemic failures in investigating sexual trafficking cases and questions the accountability of legal institutions in…

What is mentioned in this I've Had It episode?

10 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Department of Justice, Jamie Raskin, Caroline Levit, Merrick Garland. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "IHIP News: 🚨 Trump in Unredacted EPSTEIN Files OVER ONE MILLION Times! Congress TURNS ON HIM!"?

The episode runs 17 min; the transcript is about 2,647 words in 23 timestamped sections.

More from I've Had It

About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated February 11, 2026.