Trump TRIGGERED by New Epstein Files Question So Bad He Lashes Out at Kaitlan Collins

What this episode is about

The main topic revolves around the release of new Epstein files, sparking backlash from Trump, who becomes defensive during questioning about his past associations with Epstein. Key points include commentary on the criminal nature of Epstein's parties, a broader discussion on the chaotic political landscape, and issues surrounding immigration enforcement and community safety.

Key takeaways

• Partying with Epstein? That’s like saying you didn’t expect a fire at a gas station barbecue.
• Is targeting rhetoric for violence the new NRA playbook? Spoiler: it's a dangerous deflection.
• ICE's strategy: mass deportations until communities smile again. Who knew morale was so crucial?
• Thinking Trump’s critics exaggerate? They might, but downplaying ICE blame feels like whistling past a graveyard.
• Judicial warrants? Just another bureaucratic hurdle on ICE's road trip through America’s immigration nightmare.

Who speaks in this episode?

• Tim (Guest) · 10 min speaking
• Caitlyn Collins (Guest) · 4 min speaking
• Donald Trump (Guest) · 7 min speaking
• Todd Blanch (Guest) · 1 min speaking

What is discussed, and when

1. 0:00 – 5:00: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, ICE, Martin Tim
2. 5:00 – 10:00: Kate Blanch, Jeffrey Epstein
3. 10:00 – 15:00: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Ridge, Martin Tim
4. 15:00 – 20:00: Jeffrey Epstein, Kaitlan Collins, Martin Tim
5. 20:00 – 24:06: Jeffrey Epstein, Martin Tim, Kaitlan Collins

Notable quotes from "Trump TRIGGERED by New Epstein Files Question So Bad He Lashes Out at Kaitlan Collins"

• The problem is partying with Jeffrey Epstein is criminal in its nature because Jeffrey Epstein doesn't really seem to be like the kind of guy that was having normal barbecue parties. It's.

  about Jeffrey Epstein · at 0:00

• Threatening activities against ICE and its federal partners that we're seeing in the community. I said back in March of this year, if the hooric didn't stop, I was afraid there…

  about ICE · at 1:21

• You think he might have been? You think he might have been? Yeah, maybe. Up next, here's US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch on Fox News giving an absolutely wild answer as…

  about Kate Blanch · at 8:54

• Titanium, and carbon fiber, and come in over 50 colors and styles to choose from. All Ridge products have a lifetime warranty. This is literally the last wallet you'll ever…

  about Ridge · at 12:46

• Please support our show and tell them that we sent you. Let's go to Trump taking questions at the Oval Office.

  about Donald Trump · at 13:33

• Feckless corporate media and the deceptive misinformation spewing right-wing media. That's what Tim's doing over at the bull work. That's what we're doing over here at Qriket Media.

  about Martin Tim · at 22:45

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

• Jeffrey Epstein — Person · Referenced subject of scandal / alleged criminal network · 12 mentions · first at 0:00
  Central reference point for discussion of the 'Epstein files' and whether associates can/should be prosecuted; used to critique DOJ posture and elite impunity.
• Donald Trump — Person · Primary political figure discussed; clip subject · 4 mentions · first at 0:57
  Discussed in two major segments: (1) comments about 'nationalizing elections' and (2) hostile exchange with Caitlyn Collins about Epstein survivors and transparency.
• Martin Tim — Person · Co-host / panelist (on-mic participant) · 4 mentions · first at 0:22
  A recurring speaker who reacts to clips, provides analysis on elections/authoritarianism concerns, and discusses DOJ/ICE rhetoric; likely Tim Miller (The Bulwark) per internal references.
• Kate Blanch — Person · Referenced government official; clip speaker · 4 mentions · first at 8:57
  Quoted as U.S. Deputy Attorney General giving a controversial answer about whether people connected to Epstein can be prosecuted; becomes a focal point for criticism of DOJ framing.
• Kaitlan Collins — Person · Referenced journalist; questioner in clip · 4 mentions · first at 13:40
  CNN reporter shown pressing Trump on 'nationalizing elections' and later on Epstein survivor concerns; her exchange with Trump is used to illustrate misogyny and avoidance of accountability.
  Here's CNN's Caitlyn Collins pressing Trump on what nationalizing elections would actually mean.
• Bad Bunny — Person · Referenced performer (Super Bowl entertainment mention) · 1 mention · first at 0:33
  Brief cultural aside about Super Bowl entertainment and perceived pandering; not central to the political/legal discussion.
  Terrible. I just Can we not have a little escapism? I guess we'll have Bad Bunny. We love Bad Bunny. That is nice.

Companies & orgs

• ICE — Company · Business focus · 2 mentions · first at 0:57
  Discussed in the context of immigration enforcement and its controversial actions in Minneapolis.
• Green Day — Company · Referenced work · 1 mention · first at 0:44
  Mentioned as a band added to the Super Bowl lineup to appeal to a broader audience.
  And I do like that the that they pandered to the whites and they're The whites are unhappy about Bad Bunny. And so we're going to pander.

Sponsors

• Ridge — Product · Sponsor · 2 mentions · first at 12:29
  Promoted as a premium wallet alternative during the podcast's advertisement segment.

Full transcript with timestamps

0:00 The problem is partying with Jeffrey Epstein is criminal in its nature because Jeffrey Epstein doesn't really seem to be like the kind of guy that was having normal barbecue parties. It's kind of like saying, "Hey, Keith Richards invited me to a party. I didn't know there'd be blow there."

0:14 Hey everybody, welcome back to Speech Center. If you thought things couldn't get worse since our last episode, your imagination is not where you need it to be. Tim, uh, we're in a lot of chaos right now. There's also going to be a Super Bowl with the Patriots. Uh, how you feeling about that? Terrible. Terrible. I I just Can we not have a little escapism? I guess we'll have Bad Bunny. We love Bad Bunny. That is nice. And I do like that the that they pandered to the whites and they're like, "The whites are unhappy about Bad Bunny." And so we're going to pander.

0:44 We're going to add Green Day, which has to be the most hostile band imaginable to MAGA in the category of whites.

0:53 On today's show, we finally got the Epstein files, or at least most of what we're going to get. Trump wants to now nationalize elections. But first up, here's Tom Hman announcing a reduction of ICE in Minneapolis while blaming the killings on hateful rhetoric.

1:08 My goal with with the support of President Trump is to achieve a complete draw down and end this surge as soon as we can, but that is largely contingent upon the end of the illegal and threatening activities against ICE and its federal partners that we're seeing in the community. I said back in March of this year, if the hooric didn't stop, I was afraid there would be bloodshed and there has been. I wish every one of you could put that gun on your hip, put that Kevlar vest on, go out there and put put up where they put up with considering the hate, their rhetoric, the attacks, I think they performed remarkably and I'm proud of them. We came here. President Trump sent me here to help deescalate what was going on. We're not surrendering our mission. We're not walking away from our mission. We're just making this more effective and more smart. This is smart law enforcement.

2:06 Smart law enforcement makes it safer. More smarter. More smarter. Hope it goes better than the Afghanistan withdrawal.

2:17 Yeah. No, no, that's it's a it's a it's an important point. So, something to think about. Yeah. the um the mass deportations will continue until morale improves. I do believe Tom Hman compared to Bovino and given and what Nome had been saying and what Miller had been saying, he is less escalatory than what came before, but he's still not saying what you would say if you truly wanted to turn the temperature down and actually acknowledge the concerns of the people on the streets. Right.

2:43 I'll even go a little further than that. It's actually pretty disgusting to say that there's bloodshed in the streets because of the rhetoric. I mean, he's saying that basically the types of people that Renee Good and Alex Prey aligned themselves with caused their murder because their tweets were too mean or because their shouts on behalf of their neighbors were too loud. And it's a pretty gross thing for a government official to say. Um, it also is just flat untrue,

3:12 right? I think which is also important to just say clearly the bloodshed did not come from radical leftists or anti-ICE activists or anything of that nature. The murders came from his people, the people that work for him. It's telling that this guy is like the moderating force or like this is the adult in the room. um as he kind of slurs through that that those remarks,

3:36 there is a sincere belief in there that the description overall of what the Trump administration is trying to do has been over torked by uh the left and that they are taking the worst examples and using it to define the entire operation. And I don't think that's a fair rendering, but I think that's the defense that they would probably say they would believe. In the same way that they were trying to suggest that because Alex Prey potentially kicked out a tail light on one day, it means that he is less deserving of law enforcement not murdering him on another day, that because the law enforcement has felt under siege. And I imagine they genuinely do feel under siege in the Twin Cities, that makes their being trigger-happy and and anxious and twitchy uh more justified. It's in the same way that they want to hold all Somali responsible for whoever might have committed fraud. Even though 95% of

4:26 fraud on I I believe Medicaid or Medicare, whatever roughly would be the same across is committed by US citizens. They want to hold an entire group of people responsible. They like to do this group condemnation and this group punishment. But no, an ICE an ICE officer or a border patrol officer is responsible for his conduct in the moment in dealing with an individual. whatever that individual uh uh is doing and whatever risk or he poses or she poses or doesn't. You can't just bring in what happened at a restaurant, even if it's made up a few days before. You don't get to say, "But I've just been in such a foul mood because of all the hostility." This is irrelevant and doesn't matter. Now, here is Mike Johnson being questioned on the Fourth Amendment and its protections against federal law enforcement. When ICE goes to execute a warrant, it's an administrative warrant and it's issued by an immigration judge and that is a

5:14 sufficient um uh uh legal authority to go and apprehend someone. Some have complained that the force has been excessive or what have you. I I don't know. We're going to figure that out. It's part of the discussion over the next couple of weeks. I tell you what the Democrats want to do and what we cannot do and that is they want to add an entirely new layer of uh of warrant requirement. Okay? They want to they want to have a judicial warrant on top of the immigration judge warrant. You've got maybe 20 million illegals who came across the border just in the last four years. No, when the Biden Harris administration opened the border wide.

5:48 Okay, imagine if we had to go through the process of getting a judicial warrant, an additional warrant to go and apprehend people who we know are here illegally. The people who are advocating for that

5:59 don't want any immigration enforcement. They do not want to anybody to be sent out of the country here illegally and that is blatantly what their cause is.

6:08 Tim, did you see there was a a moment where a uh DOJ lawyer was being questioned by a judge about uh why the orders were being violated and why uh these petitions were not um being honored. and she just says, "This job sucks and I'd like to be held in contempt so I could just get 24 hours of rest." Yes.

6:32 The request that uh people's basic rights be honored, it continues to apply even if you're trying to deport a lot of people, even if you're trying to rapidly ramp up federal law enforcement. You sound like a [ __ ] tech guy who's like, "There's no way. We we've built something so big we can't possibly do anything to make it safe." Like imagine if a builder said that, "Sorry, the building's too big. We can't prevent it from falling down." If you would like to do this, you have to do it legally.

6:59 The whole like, "Man, living in a rule of law society is a pain argument isn't really flying for me, you know, like I get it. It does suck to live in a society." But, you know, in our country, you do have to go actually get a judicial warrant if you want to kick down somebody's door because what if you get it wrong? they've got wrong a lot. People have basic rights and um and I just think that's kind of the trade that you make if you want to live in a society where you're not going to have your rights infringed upon by the government. It's it's reminiscent.

7:33 You'll like this love because it'll be a hit on my my own people. I'm excited. It's kind of reminiscent of the argument that my boys were making after 911 about the FISA courts.

7:42 You know, it's like, well, we like we got we created an approval process. You know, we can spy on you. And it's like, well, did a judge approve? Well, like we we kind of created this other set of judges, you know, that are like administrative judges that are

7:54 and what was the percentage of approval by those judges? Was it 98 99? Like, yeah, check check check. Yeah, anybody you want to spy on, you can. And then eventually people started to kind of say, well, wait a minute. This this this feels like it's a bridge bridgement of people's rights. Like this isn't a real court. And like that's what they're doing. Essentially,

8:12 people hear administrative warrant versus judicial warrant. You're talking about one is a true warrant in the traditional sense of you have to go to a judge and get approval to do the search outside of your chain of command and the other is an administrative warrant which is basically just a procedural check inside of the administration is is the administration's own approval process that they kind of rubber stamp and they're just fundamentally different. One affords you a constitutional check the other just simply doesn't. It's it's entirely inside of the executive. I know these people are [ __ ] hacks. I I know that. I know they're hacks, but they weren't hacks in social studies in third grade, right? They weren't politicians yet. I thought some of that would have

8:54 Johnson wasn't. You think he might have been? You think he might have been? Yeah, maybe. Up next, here's US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch on Fox News giving an absolutely wild answer as to whether or not uh the predators in the Epstein files uh will be subject to any kind of prosecution. Is there any chance that any of these individuals who partied with Epstein and engaged in relations with minors will be prosecuted?

9:19 I'll never say no. And we will always investigate any evidence of misconduct, but as you know, it is not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein. And and so as horrible as it, it's not a crime to email with Mr. Epstein. And and some of these men may have done horrible things. And and if we have evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will. But it's also the kind of thing that that the American people need to understand that it it isn't a crime to party with Mr. Epstein. It isn't a crime to party.

9:46 It didn't look like that's all that was going on on some of those photos. I mean, if the photos could speak, they some of them look pretty bad.

9:51 That's right. And and unfortunately, photos can't speak and so we need witnesses and we need

9:55 Are there videotapes that you all have or They're all released. They're all released. There were some not of any not of any um

10:02 of any individuals, men um having improper, you know, sex or anything with with with victims, but there's videos. They're all released for everybody to see.

10:13 I'm upset. So, here's the thing. I'm pro partying. I like to party more than you. Like, I think of the of the kind of panelists here on Speech Center, I'm probably more of the pro party Yeah. panelist. You know, you're more of a video game advocate alone in your home. And that's right. The problem is I c I I think that partying with Jeffrey Epstein is kind of criminal in its nature. Yeah.

10:33 Because Jeffrey Epstein doesn't really seem to be like the kind of guy that was having like normal like champagne part barbecue parties. It's kind of like saying, "Hey, Keith Richards invited me to a party. I didn't know there'd be blow there, right? It's kind of like that that's that's like what he's known for is the blow."

10:49 When you see Todd Blanch say this, where is the kind of fire to fully understand this and run it to ground? the blacked out emails of names that are of men that are clearly describing criminal activity with minors. There was so much pretend emotion around this from people that are now in the administration or people that wanted Donald Trump to win about exposing this crime that flowed from QAnon all the way up to JD Vance. And now they are in power and they are suddenly all a bunch of [ __ ] feckless inner bureaucrats.

11:21 And like I see these files and it becomes a story of like oh who went here and who went there and other countries are managing to drum up ways to turn these things into prosecutions but here we are just flatfooted and I understand that there are political reasons but I also think there's like a deeper kind of cultural [ __ ] rot and evil around the fact that they just don't seem to be that [ __ ] interested. They are more concerned about protecting people that might be falsely impuged or whose reputation might be sullied in a way that it's greater than that that was merited by their actions. Those are the people that they seem to be to care about in this situation rather than the victims or rather than the we would presume at least some other co-conspirators besides Prince Andrew, Gileain Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein. I fully believe this is a representative story about our [ __ ] evil godless

12:19 elites and how they led us into this mess. And I I don't know how to come out of it, but that's where I'm at. That's where I'm at. Tim, I'm upset.

12:26 You've been hot on this. You were good on this on the pod the other day. Oh, thanks. Speech center is brought to you by Ridge. I used to have a thick, stupid wallet. It was always fraying. Didn't fit in my pocket. It was a dumb way to have a wallet. But now I have a Ridge wallet. The Ridge Wallet features a unique, slim, modern design that holds up to 12 cards plus cash. They're made with premium materials like aluminum, titanium, and carbon fiber, and come in over 50 colors and styles to choose from. All Ridge products have a lifetime warranty. This is literally the last wallet you'll ever have to buy. All Ridge wallets feature RFID blocking technology, protecting you from digital pickpockets. Losing your wallet is the worst. But with the Ridge Air Tag attachment, you'll always know exactly where it is before panic mode kicks in.

13:07 Ridge isn't just about wallets. They great premium everyday carry essentials like key cases, suitcases, and rings. All built with the same sleek, durable design. No matter what you pick, Ridge has free shipping, a 99-day risk-free trial, and a lifetime warranty on all of their products. For a limited time, our listeners get 10% off at Ridge by using the code speech at checkout. Just head to ridge.com, use the code speech, and you're all set. After you purchase, they will ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them that we sent you. Let's go to Trump taking questions at the Oval Office.

13:40 Here's CNN's Caitlyn Collins pressing Trump on what nationalizing elections would actually mean.

13:46 What exactly did you mean when you said that you should nationalize elections? And which 15 states are you talking about?

13:52 I want to see elections be honest. And if a state can't run an election, I think the people behind me should do something about it because, you know, if you think about it, a state is an agent for the federal government in elections. I don't know why the federal government doesn't do them anyway, but when you see some of these states about how horribly they run their elections, what a disgrace it is when you see crooked elections, and we had plenty of them. And by the way, we had them last time, but go to 2020. Look at the facts that are coming out. Take a look at Detroit.

14:22 Take a look at Pennsylvania. Take a look at Philadelphia. You go take a look at Atlanta. Look at some of the places that t horrible corruption on elections. And the federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved. Uh these are agents of the federal government to count the votes. If they can't count the votes legally and honestly, then somebody else should take over.

14:46 No, states are not and have never been agents of the federal government, not in counting elections, not in anything else. Again, third grade social studies sort of stuff. How worried are you right now about given what happened in Fulton County, given what Trump is saying here about the midterms?

15:02 You know, the 15 states thing is something that's worrying to me. And here's why. Trump gets these little things in his head.

15:08 Mhm. You know, Trump Trump's not exactly a secretive person. You know, he he he reveals what his plans are for the most part. And the fact that he just like out of thin air was like, you know, 15 makes me think that there's some actual planning at play. So that's a little alarming. Um my alarm is like like there are people in my orbit in the bull work democracy world who are like more alarmed than me. I do think that the Democrats are really going to schlong the Republicans in November barring some big changes um between now and then. And I think that there's going to be a too big to steal element to this. And I think that their failures and their attempt to rig it through redistricting was really meaningful. For example, Doug Mastiano when he ran against Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania was an insurrectionist. And I think that had that election, had Josh Shapiro won by two points, like maybe there would have

15:55 been people storming the capital of her in Harrisburg. But he lost by a million points and still like they didn't because it felt silly. And so, you know, will they try to [ __ ] around with it? I think so.

16:07 Yeah. If it ends up being close, are we in for a real big problem? Yeah. because I think them deciding not to seat people from California because they don't trust the mail or whatever. Like all that's possible. My alarm is tempered somewhat by what I think is their really bad political standing.

16:22 Yeah, I think that's right. I also think we are protected by just the complexity of our elections and how they are administered county by county. And you know there Steve Bannon had a line about you know wanting ICE outside of polling centers. And of course, there may be, I think, ways in which voters will they may try to intimidate people even before they've cast a ballot. But I think as we've seen in the Twin Cities, ordinary people are willing to be pretty tough uh and nonviolent in in protecting each other and their rights. And I worry about it, too. But I do think that we have a lot going for us.

16:54 Yeah. I do think just one thing to say about that while we're kind of bucking people up. Like I I do think sometimes I get frustrated why people with people on the pro-democracy side, they're just like they're going to have ICE agents standing outside of the ballot box and and and that's really going to depress turnout. And it's kind of like or maybe it will do the opposite.

17:11 Yeah. Or maybe it will inspire people to turn out. You know, a lot sometimes these efforts backfire. Absolutely. And I I just don't want a sense of like a preemptive helplessness. Um uh because I don't think that that's helpful or not necessarily accurate. Everyone has been trained by the internet to be afraid of seeing too seeming too optimistic. Authoritarianism looks stronger than it is. Democracy looks weaker than it is. We've got a lot in our corner and including the fact that Americans are a rambunctious and rebellious lot. Now, Trump's uh threats to nationalize the elections wasn't the only place where Caitlyn Collins pushed Trump. She brought up how survivors of Epstein's abuses are upset with how chaotic and incompetent these releases have been, including information about them. And Trump responded in a despicable way.

18:03 A lot of women who were are survivors of Epstein are unhappy with those redactions that came out. Some of them entire witness interviews are totally blacked out. Do you think that they should be more transparent?

18:13 They thought they released too much. You know, I heard that and you tell me something else. No. Uh I think it's really time for the country to get on to something else really, you know, now that uh nothing came out about me other than it was a conspiracy against me literally by Epstein and other people. But I think it's time now for the country to maybe get on to something else.

18:36 But what would you say to people who feel like they haven't gotten justice, Mr. President?

18:39 Something that people care about. Yeah. What what did you say? Go ahead. What would you What would you say to the survivors who feel like they haven't gotten?

18:45 The worst reporter. No wonder to see CNN has no ratings because of people like you. You know, she's a young woman. I don't think I've ever seen you smile. I've known you for 10 years. I don't think I've ever seen a smile.

18:57 I'm asking you about survivors of Jeffrey. You know why you're not smiling? Cuz you know you're not telling the truth.

19:02 Wow. Just repellent. I want to note before we talk about this specifically that uh Trump then moved on, took other questions. Those two follow-up reporters did not even acknowledge what Trump had just said to Caitlyn Collins. Moved on to different topics, which is of course what he wanted. Also standing behind him are a group of senators, including Susan Collins, who is just standing there holding a MAGA hat, I believe, while Trump just berates a woman for not smiling, for having the timmerity to ask him about the victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. What did you make of that moment, Tim? Yeah, Susan was concerned about that, but she didn't want to say anything, but she just and she was privately concerned

19:40 about the president's behavior. He um it is a bit on the nose to um you know be asked about ill treatment and abuse of young women and girls and then to lash out to that question by attacking someone and by calling them a young woman and making sex sexist attacks on them. Um, so it is I mean there's like an implicit admission at some level of um what he thinks about the victims of of Jeffrey Epstein um in the way that he handled that question. So I you know I mean he's sick. Um uh to your point the people at behind him you would not accept this in any other scenario. Like there's no situ like I don't know you know if I was at a school or work function and a person in a position of power said something such as that. The idea that nobody would challenge them nobody would say it's uncalled for. Nobody would walk out.

20:36 Nobody you know like we have a lower bar for the president than the principal of a school or the leader of a youth sports team. the idea of standing behind someone while they said something like that, the ability to kind of quiet that parts of that part of themselves, the shame of it, like the cowardice of it, it's just despicable. And then, you know, when he says, you're right, like, oh, I think it's time we move on. He's saying the victims should move on. He's saying he wants the victims to shut up and move on. And he wants Caitlyn Collins to shut up and move on and stop asking him about it.

21:02 Now, he's sort of landed on this idea that that Epstein was in a conspiracy against him with, I guess, Michael Wolf. Uh, so he's going to sue them. I I don't wonder if that'll actually happen because I think it would only keep the story in the headlines more, which is his big problem. All right, Tim, let's wrap it up. Did you see that some Jag off is trying to recruit new lawyers to the Department of Justice via Twitter? And I just thought it was so telling because man, if you're a real kind of serious person with integrity and have a law degree, the idea that you're going to want to sign up for prosecuting like Renee Good's widow combing through the Epstein files being overwhelmed 24 hours a day trying to clean up behind ice. I just can't imagine a less fulfilling way uh to use your law degree. I'd rather be like an asbestous [ __ ] lawyer. I'd rather have my face on a billboard um you know uh uh with 1800 That's why

21:53 there's that's why they're recruiting on hacks. There are a lot of hacks out there in the country. Um, so at some level, I'm sure they're going to be able to continue to do damage. But the fact that that one gal had a mental breakdown who worked for the Department of Justice and just wanted to be held in contempt so she could she could have some peace and that 14 are quitting in Minneapolis and that they're looking for people on Twitter leads me to believe that, you know, maybe there's there's some supply and demand issues they're facing as far as hack hacked attorneys are concerned.

22:20 And that's another thing to be optimistic about. I'm second dose of optimism for

22:24 absolutely they don't know the guys even the valueless people are not seeing it as in their interest because there are very smart capable lawyers who have no values but uh even they are looking at this and saying not for me but I'll tell you uh if you're watching this you're not a valueless lawyer uh you're a person who cares about democracy and building an independent uh media ecosystem to combat both the kind of feckless corporate media and the deceptive misinformation spewing right-wing media. That's what Tim's doing over at the bull work. That's what we're doing over here at Qriket Media.

22:53 Like, subscribe, leave us a comment. It really does help us build this channel. Every subscriber helps get this in front of more people. You can subscribe for free right now. You can become a friend of the pod and support us and get free bonus content and and episodes that are only for the community. Whatever you do, help us help uh get good read. And and I read the comments on speech center comments.

23:17 Yeah. Because sometimes people discuss the sexual tension and like there other you know they talk about who's handsomemer. The comments on speech center are are

23:25 are usually kind of interesting. They're titillating. So I So if you want if you want to catch my attention

23:31 what is the latest on our sexual tension according to the commentators. I'm interested.

23:35 It's kind of hit or miss and miss waxes and waines. Yeah for sure. For sure. All right. Well and now we'll Wayne and we'll see you all next time. Thanks.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "Trump TRIGGERED by New Epstein Files Question So Bad He Lashes Out at Kaitlan Collins"?

Tim (Guest), Caitlyn Collins (Guest), Donald Trump (Guest), Todd Blanch (Guest).

What is "Trump TRIGGERED by New Epstein Files Question So Bad He Lashes Out at Kaitlan Collins" about?

The main topic revolves around the release of new Epstein files, sparking backlash from Trump, who becomes defensive during questioning about his past associations with Epstein. Key points include commentary on the criminal nature of Epstein's parties, a broader discussion on the chaotic political landscape, and issues surrounding immigration enforcement and community safety.

What is mentioned in this Lovett or Leave It episode?

9 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Martin Tim, ICE, Kate Blanch, Kaitlan Collins. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "Trump TRIGGERED by New Epstein Files Question So Bad He Lashes Out at Kaitlan Collins"?

The episode runs 24 min; the transcript is about 4,839 words in 64 timestamped sections.

More from Lovett or Leave It

• All analyzed episodes
• Books mentioned on Lovett or Leave It
• People mentioned on Lovett or Leave It
• Sponsors mentioned on Lovett or Leave It
• Topics mentioned on Lovett or Leave It