Transcript

MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!

From MeidasTouch · Episode page · Watch on YouTube

· 24 min · 4,081 words · 44 timestamped sections

This is the full, timestamped transcript of "MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!", an episode of MeidasTouch published February 11, 2026 (24 min, about 4,081 words). It mentions 11 people, works and ideas, including Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, United States Senate, Congressman Thomas Massie.

What this episode is about

MAGA Mike Johnson faces a significant setback as a recent vote in the House results in a 217-214 defeat, despite his majority support, allowing a resolution to address the legality of Donald Trump's tariffs against the world to move forward. The failed vote also exposes cracks within the GOP, as members defect from Johnson's agenda, highlighting tensions over Congressional authority and emergency tariff measures.

Key takeaways

  • Maga Mike's defeat exposes GOP divisions; even a majority can't shield him from internal dissent.
  • Failed rule means Trump's tariffs now face the light—how will Republicans vote when it counts?
  • Mike Johnson's record rule failures highlight an alarming trend: procedural chaos in the GOP's ranks.
  • As tariffs raise inflation, Republican accountability could reshape the midterms; will they stand by Trump?
  • Congress must reclaim its power over tariffs; it's time to stop hiding behind executive overreach.

Who speaks in this episode?

What is discussed, and when

  1. – 5:00: Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, United States Senate
  2. – 10:00: Donald Trump, United States Senate, Don Bacon, Mike Johnson
  3. – 15:00: Donald Trump, Congressman Thomas Massie, Mike Johnson, Epstein Island
  4. – 20:00: Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Don Bacon
  5. – 24:11: Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Bernie Sanders

Notable quotes from "MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!"

  • A humiliating defeat for Magga Mike Johnson. What you just saw right there was a vote where Magga Mike Johnson lost the vote despite having a majority in the House of Representatives. He lost.
    about House of Representatives · at
  • Intimidate Massie and Bacon and Kylie to flip their vote to yes. But the thing is that you have Donald Trump like a viciously attacking Massie and Massie's wife. And by the…
    about Donald Trump · at
  • Now, earlier in the day, Magamike Johnson was asked about Howard Lutnik, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, who testified before the United States Senate yesterday and admitted that he brought his little children back in.
    about United States Senate · at
  • Of course not. It's absurd. Howard Lutnik is a great commerce secretary. He's done an extraordinary job for the country and Thomas Massie should stop being political.
    about Mike Johnson · at
  • Well, those days are over thanks to Ridge. Just like Ridge revolutionized the wallet, Ridge has now changed the game for portable charging. Ridg's 5-in-1 travel power bank has built-in.
    about Ridge · at
  • Or just a pathological liar. But the idea that anybody would believe that this is a great economy when 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck when the cost of the health care is going up. People can't afford housing.
    about Bernie Sanders · at
  • Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our Substack at midasplus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron Philipki, ad free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content.
    about Midas Touch · at

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

  • Donald Trump — Person · Referenced political figure (policy target) · 19 mentions · first at
    Central figure whose proposed/implemented tariffs and alleged DOJ actions drive the episode’s procedural fight in the House and broader political critique.
  • Mike Johnson — Person · Referenced political actor (House leadership) · 4 mentions · first at
    Portrayed as the key procedural gatekeeper who attempted to pass a House rule with a 'poison pill' to delay/avoid votes challenging Trump’s tariffs and who defends Lutnick.
  • Congressman Thomas Massie — Person · Referenced lawmaker (GOP dissenter / critic within episode) · 5 mentions · first at
    Highlighted as a Republican who voted against the rule and publicly criticizes Lutnick’s Epstein-related statements and Johnson’s alignment with Trump.
    Democrats and Thomas Massie saying he should resign. Do you think that Howard Lutnik should resign?
  • Don Bacon — Person · Referenced lawmaker (GOP dissenter on tariffs) · 4 mentions · first at
    Used as an example of a Republican opposing tariff policy and opposing using rule votes to 'legislate,' and as a key defector causing the rule to fail.
    Don't like putting the important work of the House on pause, but Congress needs to be able to debate on tariffs. Tariffs have been a net negative for the economy and are a…
  • Howard Lutnick — Person · Referenced administration official (controversy subject) · 1 mention · first at
    Discussed as Trump’s Commerce Secretary amid allegations/inconsistencies about ties to Jeffrey Epstein; defended by Johnson and criticized by Massie.
    Nothing wrong about doing that. And Maggamike was asked, well, Howard Lutnik lied and said that he had never been to Epstein Island and only saw Epstein once in 2005. and now…
  • Bernie Sanders — Person · Referenced political commentator (quoted critic) · 2 mentions · first at
    Quoted criticizing claims of a 'great economy' and pointing to cost-of-living pressures, reinforcing the episode’s anti-tariff/economic critique.

Companies & orgs

  • Midas Touch — Company · Business focus · 1 mention · first at
    Company associated with the podcast, mentioned in promotional content

Places & events

  • House of Representatives — Place · Setting · 6 mentions · first at
    Primary legislative body where key votes and debates discussed in the episode take place
  • United States Senate — Place · Setting · 3 mentions · first at
    Legislative body where key testimonies and decisions discussed in the episode take place
  • Epstein Island — Place · Setting · 3 mentions · first at
    Location associated with Jeffrey Epstein, discussed in the context of political figures' connections to Epstein
    Now, earlier in the day, Magamike Johnson was asked about Howard Lutnik, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, who testified before the United States Senate yesterday and admitted that he brought his little children back in.

Sponsors

  • Ridge — Company · Sponsor · 2 mentions · first at
    Company promoted during the podcast for its products

Full transcript with timestamps

217. The resolution is not adopted. Without objection, a motion to reconsider is laid on the table.

A humiliating defeat for Magga Mike Johnson. What you just saw right there was a vote where Magga Mike Johnson lost the vote despite having a majority in the House of Representatives. He lost the vote as GOP members defected. The vote was 217 against to 214 in favor. And the vote was on something called a rule that would create the parameters for a debate on future pieces of potential resolutions and legislation. But what made this a very big deal is that in this so-called rule, MAGA Mike put in a poison pill that would prevent Congress from having any debate or votes on Donald Trump's so-called emergency tariffs against the world and that Maggamike would cut off a vote about whether or not Congress could declare Trump's tariffs against the world illegal. And Maggamike wanted to push that vote off for a year. And he slipped it into this rule to try to get Congress to agree to not even debate a vote on

whether or not Trump's tariffs against the world can be declared unlawful. So what happened here was when the GOP defected against MAGA Mike, this will allow a resolution to come to the House floor today declaring Donald Trump's tariffs against Canada and the rest of the world unlawful. If the rule passed, then the rule would have prevented that vote from happening. And I can get really into the weeds of kind of congressional procedure because you may be wondering, well, can't Magga Mike block a vote that would block Donald Trump's tariffs against the world? You can't because of something called an national emergencies procedures act. And because what this would be considered blocking Donald Trump's tariffs against the world would be called a privileged resolution. You're allowed to bring it at any time and any member of Congress, Democrat, can bring it and MAGA Mike is unable to block it. So, this is a big

deal. Meaning that what we can expect to happen today is a vote that could come to the House floor blocking Trump's tariffs against Canada, blocking Donald Trump's tariffs against other countries. It's a would require a joint resolution, though. So once it passes in the House of Representatives, it would then have to go to the United States Senate and then it would go to Donald Trump's uh for his signature. Donald Trump could then try to veto it. But then there would be a super majority to try to uh overturn Donald Trump's veto. But what MAGA Mike wanted to avoid is that now because the rule failed, a vote's going to take place and now the entire country will get to see what Republicans really feel about Donald Trump's tariffs against the world. So, they're going to have to take votes, and this is important heading into the midterms, that if they're voting in favor of Donald Trump's tariffs against the

world, which the American people realize now is a tax on American companies, which are passed through to American consumers. That's why there are horrible jobs reports right now. That's why inflation is surging again. Then Americans can now hold these members of Congress accountable. So, Magga Mike wanted to have this rule to prohibit debate to allow a vote to block Donald Trump's tariffs against the world to protect, you see what I'm saying here, to protect his Republican members from having to take this vote in the first place. And now they all get exposed. You see, we did a little schoolhouse rocks right there. I think that's kind of the graduate school level schoolhouse rock.

So, here was the big news last night. The rule fails and the vote right there. 217 against, 214 in favor. As Jake Sherman from Punchball New reports reports, the House has defeated a rule that would have blocked lawmakers ability to bring up resolutions challenging Trump's tariffs. The vote was 214, yay, 217 against Thomas Massie, Kevin Kylie, and Don Bacon all voted no. These resolutions will now flood the floor in the months running up to the election. So we can expect votes perhaps as early as today in the House blocking Donald Trump's tariffs against Canada and other countries and members are going to have to vote one way or another how they really feel. They can't hide behind the rule. Now, this rule was kept open, the vote on it for hours and hours and hours, and Magga Mike was trying to intimidate Massie and Bacon and Kylie to flip their vote to yes. But the thing is is that you have Donald Trump like a

viciously attacking Massie and Massie's wife. And by the way, Don Bacon has been someone who's been very outspoken against Donald Trump's tariffs against the world. and Kylie is a very vulnerable Republican right now in California after Prop 50. So, they certainly weren't changing uh their votes and they all voted against the rule and they could not be coerced uh by Maggamike. Aaron Fchner says this was Mike Johnson's third failed rule vote of the 119th Congress, bringing him closer to tying the modern era record for rule failure in the House, which is currently held by Mike Johnson from the 118th 18th Congress. It is so rare for rule for rules to fail. They're basically procedural in nature. You just pass the rule and then you go on and actually vote on the thing. But Maggamite can't even get the rules passed. But then again, he slipped into the rule, the poison pill to block Congress from

exercising its article one power to be involved in taxation and be involved in regulating tariffs. Tariffs are a form of taxation. Congress member Dan Don Bacon, Don Bacon said the following. I don't like putting the important work of the House on pause, but Congress needs to be able to debate on tariffs. Tariffs have been a net negative for the economy and are a significant tax that the American consumers, manufacturers, and farmers are paying. Article one of the Constitution places authority over taxes and tariffs with Congress for a reason.

But for too long, we have handed that authority to the executive branch. It's time for Congress to reclaim that responsibility. I also oppose using the rules votes to legislate. I want the debate and the right to vote on tariffs. Now, earlier in the day, Magamike Johnson was asked about Howard Lutnik, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, who testified uh before the United States Senate yesterday and admitted that he brought his little children uh back in 2012 to Epstein's Island, but he saw nothing wrong about doing that. And Maggamike was asked, well, you know, Howard Lutnik lied and said that he had never been to Epstein Island and only saw Epstein once in 2005. and now he's bringing his children there. Like, do you think he should resign? Because it shows pretty poor judgment to lie about child sex trafficking uh relationships with Epstein um and and knowing Epstein and then to bring your children to an

island where child sex trafficking is happening. Not saying that that's what happened at all with his children, but it's pretty bad judgment to bring your children to an island where children get sex trafficked and then tell your friend to bring their children there. So, Magga Mike, what do you think about that? Magga Mike, here. Play this clip.

Mr. Speaker, in in Howard Lutnik had said that he had cut out ties with Jeffrey Epstein in 2005, but the documents that came out contradict that. Democrats and Thomas Massie saying he should resign. Do you think that Howard Lutnik should resign?

Of course not. It's absurd. Howard Lutnik is a is a great commerce secretary. He's done an extraordinary job for the country and Thomas Massie should stop being political.

Do you have any concerns about Lutnick's ties with I don't know anything about that. I know Howard as an individual and and I I I trust his word on it. I mean, I don't know of the timing and all that. I I'm not sure. You have to ask others.

Do you have any interest? Do you have any interest in reviewing the unredacted file, sir? The FC file?

Of course, I have an interest. Um, for me, it's it's timing. I've got Chairman Comr and many of our colleagues that are going down to comb through that. Uh, Chairman Comr will go do it himself. I have a lot of faith in him and his his ability and his team. um the the lawyers of oversight are going through it and members themselves as you know it's unredact and available to everybody. I intend to go down myself right now I'm trying to keep the train on the tracks and and we've got to do all this stuff simultaneously. So I am I am convinced the DOJ is complying with everything they're required to do there. We still have a pending report where they will give us where they will formally explain why some of the redactions were made.

But I think it's a good move for them to put the millions of documents in the skiff so that members can go in and see and verify this for themselves. There's some good work, good review being done on that. I applaud it. It's important. We have to make sure the justice is is carried forward for these victims and we're all committed to that

on reconciliation. What's that? You didn't I didn't Did you record it? Yeah, I did. But I took it out cuz

Yeah. Okay. You guys got to tell me. And shortly thereafter, Maggamike Johnson was seen running away from reporters who were simply asking him his response to Donald Trump using the Department of Justice to try to indict two Democratic senators and four Democratic House members. But ultimately, the grand jury rejected the indictment and Trump was trying to indict them for making a video telling members of the military that they must refuse unlawful orders. So, Maggamike, what was your response to that? or are you just going to run away, try to formulate your thoughts, and then ultimately agree with whatever you think Donald Trump wants you to say? Here, play this clip.

Mr. Speaker, news just broke this evening that uh federal prosecutors tried to indict the six Democrats in the disobey illegal orders video, but a grand jury in Washington did that. Do you believe that those six Democrats should be indicted?

Um, I'm going to reserve comment on this until I review that. That's the first I've heard of it. I mean, I look, I think that anytime you're obstructing law enforcement and um getting in the way of these sensitive operations, it's a very serious thing and it probably is a crime and and um yeah, they probably should be indicted.

But they were just reiterating the law that that members of the military should not have to obey illegal orders.

Yeah, but I think they went further than that. I think they were they were suggesting that they disobey the orders and I think that crosses a line. So, it was very serious. Um, I'm glad the due attention's been paid to it and I hope that they straighten up their guys.

Doesn't it annoy you that all your devices have different charging cords? Your phone, your headphones, your watch, your Kindle, all different. Honestly, it should be illegal. How is it that we have AI robots, but we still have to travel with five cords tangled up in our bag just to keep our devices alive? Well, those days are over thanks to Ridge. Just like Ridge revolutionized the wallet, Ridge has now changed the game for portable charging. Ridg's 5-in-1 travel power bank has built-in cables and lets you charge all your devices at the same time with just one power bank and no extra cables. MagSafe wireless charging, Apple Watch charger, lightning USBC, every way you need to charge, all in one premium device. No more juggling adapters and wall outlets at the airport just to get to 20%. With 20 watts of power, it charges your phone as fast as it possibly can. And with 10,000 milliamp hours capacity, you've

got up to three full phone charges in your pocket. It has MagSafe compatible wireless charging, so you can keep it magnetically attached to the back of your iPhone if you want some permanent extra juice. And the newest iPhone just dropped, so make sure you pair it with power bank that actually keeps up. Like everything Ridge makes, it's built to last. With free shipping, a 99-day risk-free trial, and a lifetime warranty, this is the last power bank you'll ever need. And if you don't already have a Ridge wallet, you should.

Slim, modern RFID blocking and built to last. It's the last wallet you'll ever have to buy. One thing to pack, five ways to power. You can find Ridg's power bank at Best Buy. Or our listeners can get 10% off at ridge.com by using code midas at checkout. Just head to ridge.com and use code Midas and you're all set. After your purchase, they'll ask where you heard about them. Please support our show and let them know that Midas Touch sent you. Now, we heard from uh Republican Congress member Thomas Massie. Um cuz you heard uh over there Maga Mike Johnson saying that Massie needs to stop playing political games with Lutnik. Political games. Maga Mike, you're covering up a child sex trafficking ring. What's the political game to call out Howard Lutnik for bringing his children to Epstein Island, then going into business with Epste and then accepting donations from Epstein for some award you won in 2017. Here's

what Republican from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, who's been very principled on this issue, has to say. Play this clip.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said today that you were you should stop playing political games and he said that Howard Lutnik is a great commerce secretary. What's your response to that, sir?

The speaker has to do what Donald Trump wants. This the speaker right now, I think we're stalled on a vote in the House um because he can't get the bill passed and he can't afford to lose any political capital. So, what he's decided to do instead of siding with the American people or siding with our Republican conference, he's siding with Donald Trump and basically doing whatever Donald Trump wants him to do over here. Republican Congressman Thomas Massie. Thank you for joining us again tonight. I appreciate you coming back here on the show.

Thanks, Caitlyn. Maybe my voice will come back next time. Yeah, we'll get you some tea. Thank you so much, sir.

More from Massie here on Lutnik. Let's play it. Secretary Lutnik today, as you heard, you had called on him to resign before he came out today and acknowledged that yes, he did go to Jeffrey Epstein's island with his family and another couple in 2012. Obviously, he had said that they had cut off contact back in 2005. Based on what you heard today, did that change your mind at all?

It solidified my decision. Look, the problem isn't that he went to Epstein Island. That that's not a crime. It's not appropriate, I would say, to take your family to an island where people knew that bad things were happening. What the the problem is, how do you have confidence in Secretary of Commerce who lied about it just recently? like that podcast wasn't that long ago. He lied about it recently and then he was forced only when he was sworn in to give a truthful answer and I think it's a matter of confidence in the people who are leading this country and I don't have confidence in somebody who will lie like that. And then Massie talks more about what he saw in going through um some of these additional redactions and what he saw with Lutnik here. Play this clip right here. I believe you went back to the the Justice Department today. If you did, what more can you tell us about what you saw?

Well, I saw that Lutnik shared um his phone number with Epstein and that their assistants were setting up phone calls between them. So, there is at least that other connection. I didn't find any new names today. I didn't have a lot of time to spend there. But the main, by the way, it's a room with four computers and it's busy all the time. There's always at least four congressmen in there. And the main complaint that I hear as we search through these files is that when you unredact some of the files, you encounter more redactions. And then when we ask the DOJ, why are these files redacted? Why can't we remove the redactions? The DOJ says, well, that's the form in which we received the files.

Now, here's the problem with that, Caitlyn. The legislation that Roana and I wrote directs the attorney general to produce the documents, but they have to give all the documents that are in the possession not of the DOJ, but also of the FBI and also of the um US attorneys. So, what's happened, it seems, is that the US attorneys andor the FBI are have redacted documents, given them to the DOJ, and then the DOJ hasn't done their diligence to go get the original documents. So then you had Democratic Congress member Joe Nagus from Colorado.

He gave a speech on the House floor about how these MAGAS have absolutely zero spine. Grow a spine. And to be fair though, you had Bacon, Kylie, and Massie vote against the rule. But this was Nagusa's speech before that took place. Let's play this clip right here. Now, one could ask, Mr. chairman, as I suspect you would. Well, what's the gentleman from Colorado's suggestion? Lucky for you, Mr. Chairman, I have one because we know that one of the reasons that prices are going up across the board in the United States are tariffs.

This president's reckless policies with respect to tariffs. And we have some solutions in that regard. Ways that the Congress can finally stop abdicating its authority and exercise its powers with respect to tariffs. I think the chairman knows that because Speaker Johnson decided to tuck into the rule that we're considering today a measure that would prevent the House from considering any changes to the president's tariff policies for yet another 6 months. I'm going to read you a quote. quote, "It will be the fourth time this rule vote putting a gag on tariff debates has been done. I don't think tariffs are good for the economy, manufacturing jobs, and a industry.

American consumers pay the tariffs and thus it is a big tax. I support giving these authorities back to the Congress. These aren't my words. These are Republican Congressman Don Bacon's words. your colleague who agrees that what Speaker Johnson is trying to do is yet again gag the United States Congress. So to Mr. Bacon, I say thank you for your honesty. And to the rest of my colleagues, I say, "Where is your backbone? Where is your spine? Stand up for the Constitution as your colleague is doing. Stand up for the House of Representatives. stand up for your constituents.

Shameful, Mr. Speaker, and I'm hopeful that perhaps that political courage that Mr. Bacon is showing will be contagious. Maybe a few more of my colleagues will join him.

And just to see how recklessly Donald Trump deals with tariffs. This is what Donald Trump was saying last night on an interview with Larry Cudlaw on Fox about why he put additional tariffs on Switzerland because he didn't like the way the prime minister of Switzerland. It's like I didn't it was like a lady. I didn't like the way the lady was talking to me. Play this clip.

Then I got an emergency call from I believe the prime minister of Switzerland and she was very aggressive but nice but very aggressive. Sir, we are a small country. We can't do this. We can't do this. We are I couldn't get off the thought. We are a small country. I said, you may be a small country, but we have a $42 billion deficit with you. No, no, we are a small country. Again and again and again. I couldn't get off the phone. So, it was at 30%. And I didn't really like the way she talked to us. And so, instead of giving her a reduction, I raised it to 39%.

And then they I got inundated by people from Switzerland and I figured you know what we'll do something that's a little bit more palatable at least now. But I realized that all these you know Switzerland you think of as you know ultra she ultra perfect every they're not. They're only that way because we allow them to rip us off and make all this money. And then it's further evidence of Donald Trump's attack on Congress. I'm sure you've heard the story by now, but uh yesterday Donald Trump tried to indict the six members of Congress, two senators and two House of Representatives and two Congress members um uh for making the video telling our soldiers that they are not allowed to follow unlawful orders, which is a restatement of the law. Well, Donald Trump had Janed Piro, the former Fox host, go after those members of Congress, the two senators and the two representatives, um, and try to get an

indictment against them for sedicious conspiracy. You had Senators Kelly and Senator Slotkin, and then you had Congress member Crowe, Congress member Goodlander, Congress member Hulahand, uh, Congress member Delusio. We're talking about Navy veterans. We're talking about astronaut. These are the people that Donald Trump was going after yesterday. Fortunately, the grand jury uh rejected it. Um finally, I'll share with you this. U here's what Bernie Sanders had to say yesterday about, you know, we know the jobs report is horrible, but here's what Bernie Sanders said that when Donald Trump keeps bragging about the best economy. Here, play this clip. in terms of I got to tell you though by seeing that tape you just rolled.

You wonder whether Trump is completely crazy and delusional uh or just a pathological liar. But the idea that anybody would believe that this is a great economy when 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck when the cost of the health care is going up. People can't afford housing. Uh people can't afford their basic groceries. child care system is dysfunctional. People can't afford to go to college and if this is the greatest economy in the history of the world, God help us. So now the question is, is Magga going to try to shut down Cong now that the rule has failed? Will Magga try to shut down Congress?

Especially as they're terrified that Congress is getting deeper and deeper into the Epstein sex trafficking ring information. Like we know Jamie Rascin was at the DOJ yesterday and the day before as well as many members of the House of Representatives were. And they've uncovered that there were a million references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files. A million references. That's what Rascin said. 38,000 in the redacted files, a million references in the unredacted files. So Magga Mike may try to shut down Congress again, but we'll keep you posted every step of the way. Hit subscribe. Let's get to six million. Thanks everybody for watching.

Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our Substack at midasplus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron Philipki, ad free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content only available at midasplus.com.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!"?

Maga Mike Johnson (Guest), Thomas Massie (Guest), Caitlyn (Host), Dan Don Bacon (Guest), Joe Nagus (Guest).

What is "MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!" about?

MAGA Mike Johnson faces a significant setback as a recent vote in the House results in a 217-214 defeat, despite his majority support, allowing a resolution to address the legality of Donald Trump's tariffs against the world to move forward. The failed vote also exposes cracks within the GOP, as members defect from Johnson's agenda, highlighting tensions over Congressional authority and…

What is mentioned in this MeidasTouch episode?

11 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Donald Trump, House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, United States Senate, Congressman Thomas Massie, Epstein Island. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "MAGA Mike IN TERROR as he LOSES CONTROL of HOUSE!!"?

The episode runs 24 min; the transcript is about 4,081 words in 44 timestamped sections.

More from MeidasTouch

About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated February 12, 2026.