Transcript
🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!
From MeidasTouch · Episode page · Watch on YouTube
· 11 min · 1,838 words · 28 timestamped sections
This is the full, timestamped transcript of "🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!", an episode of MeidasTouch published February 13, 2026 (11 min, about 1,838 words). It mentions 14 people, works and ideas, including Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Jessica Talov, Goldman Sachs.
What this episode is about
The discussion highlights Donald Trump's efforts to downplay his connections to Jeffrey Epstein amid growing scrutiny, particularly during a confrontational segment on Fox News where the host raises concerns about Trump's alleged ties to child sex trafficking. The conversation reveals tensions between Trump loyalists and those seeking accountability, emphasizing a stark contrast between Trump's narrative and the ongoing calls for transparency regarding Epstein's crimes.
Key takeaways
- Trump's plea to 'move on' only fuels suspicion; Americans crave transparency, not amnesia.
- With 50% unsure about Trump's ties to Epstein, public curiosity may soon eclipse political spin.
- While the Dow soars, average households face rising costs—voters want real solutions, not deflections.
- Ignoring Epstein’s files is a risky gamble; Americans demand clarity, not comforting narratives.
- Emotional defense tactics hurt credibility; calmer voices resonate more than shrill accusations in politics.
Who speaks in this episode?
- Jessica Talov (Guest) · 3 min speaking
- Cash Patel · 1 min speaking
- Pam Bondi (Guest) · 2 min speaking
- Howard Lutnik · 1 min speaking
- Donald Trump (Guest) · 1 min speaking
- John Oaf · 1 min speaking
What is discussed, and when
- – 3:00: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, Jessica Talov, National Review
- – 6:00: Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Bill and Hillary Clinton
- – 9:00: Caroline Levit, Moscow
- – 11:15: Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Goldman Sachs
Notable quotes from "🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!"
Trump wants the American people to move on. Fox News want the American people to know the truth on Epstein.
about Jeffrey Epstein · atOath. Cash Patel's statements were false. They are in possession. They were in possession at the time and they're still in possession of evidence that other men participated in the sex trafficking.
about Cash Patel · atBut matter to voters. First of all, Donald Trump and his family, their corruption. This story, Andy McCarthy is doing a series for the National Review on it. All the crypto…
about National Review · atAnd yet it gets worse. On to a recent poll that you go conducted. Half of Americans now say that Donald Trump is actively trying to cover up Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and nearly as many think that he was personally involved in.
about Donald Trump · atDuring the hearing, Democrats slammed her for withholding information, mismanaging redactions, and failing to protect victims.
about Attorney General Pam Bondi · atFind out about it. but 9-year-old victims of that all over the world. Moscow was the same too. It was sort of like a real global network that they're now getting to see on these four terminals they have outside.
about Moscow · atI mean think about it. There are resignations happening in major companies like Goldman Sachs. There are calls for prosecution in the United Kingdom. But here in the United States where Epstein was based, the simple.
about Goldman Sachs · at
Who and what is mentioned in this episode?
People
- Jeffrey Epstein — Person · Primary referenced subject of controversy · 9 mentions · first at
The alleged crimes and the 'Epstein files' are the core controversy driving the episode’s critique of government transparency and accountability. - Donald Trump — Person · Primary referenced political figure · 8 mentions · first at
Central figure in the discussion about public pressure to release the Epstein files and allegations of a cover-up; repeatedly contrasted with calls to 'move on.' - Attorney General Pam Bondi — Person · Referenced government official under criticism · 2 mentions · first at
Portrayed as mishandling congressional testimony and DOJ messaging about the Epstein files; criticized for tone, deflection, and not engaging survivors. - Jessica Talov — Person · Referenced TV panelist raising the issue · 1 mention · first at
Identified as a Fox News 'The Five' host who presses that Trump has an 'Epstein files problem,' creating on-air conflict with co-hosts.I'm saying that he has an Epstein Files problem, and he knows it.
- Bill and Hillary Clinton — Person · Referenced comparison/deflection target · 1 mention · first at
Raised in a heated exchange as a counterpoint ('no one has a problem more than the Clintons'), used to deflect from Trump/Epstein discussion.No one has a problem more than the Clintons.
- Cash Patel — Person · Referenced government figure accused of false statements · 1 mention · first at
Cited as having made 'false' statements about evidence possession related to sex trafficking participants; used to argue officials are withholding information. - Howard Lutnick — Person · Referenced witness/example in narrative · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as testifying and allegedly contradicting prior statements about visiting 'the island,' used to underscore elite proximity and credibility disputes.Campaign rally. If it's us versus them and Trump is just saying ignore it. It's going to go away. And you have Howard Lutnik for instance testifying that he went to the island in 2012 when he said in 201 you never cared about this until now.
- Caroline Levit — Person · Referenced administration spokesperson · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned alongside Trump and Bondi as pushing the message that it’s 'time to move on,' contrasted with survivors’ demands for accountability.But Trump and Bondi and Caroline Levit, they keep saying that it's time to move on when survivors, the American public, hell, the world are saying, Nah, that's not the case. There needs to be.
- Bonnie Watson Coleman — Person · Attorney General · 1 mention
Her testimony regarding the Epstein files is significant in the context of the ongoing controversy.Attorney General Bonnie didn't seem to directly answer that question. What do you make of what she did say?
- Andy McCarthy — Person · Referenced commentator/author · 1 mention · first at
Cited as writing a series for National Review about alleged corruption/crypto money, supporting the episode’s claim of parallel controversies.But matter to voters. First of all, Donald Trump and his family, their corruption. This story, Andy McCarthy is doing a series for the National Review on it. All the crypto…
- George Soros — Person · Referenced political foil · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as being name-checked at a rally in the context of 'us vs them' elite narratives tied to the Epstein discourse.Saying it is an elite problem. John Oaf is now calling it the Epstein class and even name check George Soros in his campaign rally. If it's us versus them and Trump is just…
Companies & orgs
- Goldman Sachs — Company · Case study · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned in the context of resignations happening in major companies due to the Epstein files controversy. - National Review — Company · Referenced work · 1 mention · first at
Andy McCarthy is doing a series for the National Review on the corruption of Donald Trump and his family.
Places & events
- Moscow — Place · Setting · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as part of the global network involved in the Epstein scandal.
Full transcript with timestamps
Trump wants the American people to move on. Fox News want the American people to know the truth on Epstein.
I'm saying that he has an Epstein Files problem, and he knows it. Yeah, that's quite a narrative swing for Trump. Amidst the Epstein Files controversy, Trump and his cronies would hope that they quietly disappeared after a few weeks in the headlines. But perhaps thanks to the diabolical appearance from his own attorney general where she sat in front of survivors while never acknowledging their very presence and instead offered a retort to serious crimes involving child sex trafficking with yeah but what about the DAO?
The DAO is over 50,000. Have you apologized to President Trump? Have you apologized to President Trump? All of you. I find it interesting that she keeps going after President Trump, the greatest president in American history. You sit here and you attack the president and I am not going to have it. He is the most transparent president in the nation's history. Donald Trump, the Dow, the Dow right now is
I provided the evidence today that shows that his statements were false under oath. Cash Patel's statements were false. They are in possession. They were in possession at the time and they're still in possession of evidence that other men participated in the sex trafficking.
Attorney General Bonnie didn't seem to um directly answer that question. What do you make of of what she did say?
She didn't answer anything. She came here just ready to talk about the Dow Jones and the and the NASDAQ, which seems kind of crazy to me. Well, first, as the subject was brought up on Fox News, the five host Jessica Talov, much to the frustration of her Trump enabling co-hosts, brought up the fact that Trump has an Epstein file problem. It's pretty obvious. Not just the fact that he's in them more than Harry Potter is mentioned in the books about Harry Potter, but that the American people are not buying his approach that people should just move on.
Say that the average American household paid an extra $1,000 last year because of the tariffs. It'll go up to $1,300 this year. Consistently, voters say though Trump isn't focused on the things that they care about, which is lowering prices. And I think that there are two plot lines that the administration for obvious reasons really want to ignore but matter to voters. First of all, Donald Trump and his family, their corruption. This story, uh Andy McCarthy is doing a series for the National Review on it. All the crypto money that they're taking in um from the UAE and others is a really big deal. And then what's going on with the Epstein files and I'm not making this partisan. I'm saying it is an elite problem. Um John Oaf is now calling it the Epstein class and even name check George Soros in his campaign rally. If it's us versus them and Trump is just saying ignore it. It's going to go away. And you have Howard
Lutnik for instance testifying that he went to the island in 2012 when he said in 201
you never cared about this until now because Trump won. THIS IS JUST LIKE IMMIGRATION. YOU DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ALL THE ILLEGALS until Trump won and now you care about Epste under Epste.
I didn't and I was obviously very careful to say that. I am not accusing the president of doing anything. I'm saying that he has an Epstein files problem and he knows it.
No one has a problem more than the Clintons. Who cares? Don't elect Bill CLINTON.
YOU BROUGHT IT UP. I DON'T CARE. DON'T VOTE FOR BILL CLINTON. BILL, if you're gonna run, don't do it.
You brought it up. And yet it gets worse. On to a recent poll that you go conducted. Half of Americans now say that Donald Trump is actively trying to cover up Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and nearly as many think that he was personally involved in them. That's a lot of people regardless if you want to swing it as people with TDS. Surveys show that the public overwhelmingly want the Epstein files released and transparent disclosure to be at the forefront of American politics at the moment, not these half-assed answers. I think the yelling to me, Kennedy, that's I always find it so unpersuasive for everybody. Yeah. So, Scott Bessant went before Congress and was very calm, was very measured and uh he has become the king of laconic sick burns like he can absolutely destroy you and it won't raise his heart rate or his blood pressure. And uh that is a lesson that Pam Bondi Bondi needs to internalize because it's it's different.
She comes off like a shrieking Karen. You know, it's like I want this country to do well. I want to be convinced that the president, I don't care what administration it is, that we're on the right track and the people who are in charge of every aspect of the federal government, uh they have their position locked up and they're doing the very best they can with an incredibly talented team. When she's this emotional, it looks like she's lost a little bit of the edge. Meanwhile, Quinnipac found that only 70% of voters approve of how this administration has managed the Epstein files while 63% disapprove. Yeah, that's more than just a bad poll. That's national judgment on the matter.
Uh, and that remains true. And this call, if it did happen, corroborates exactly what President Trump has said from the beginning. And I'm sure many of you when you read that that alleged FBI report probably thought to yourself, "Wow, this really cracks our narrative that we've been trying to push about this president for many years." So, uh, we're moving on from that. Reagan,
and and let's talk about something that didn't help Trump's case either. Pam Bondi's congressional testimony. She was called to explain the Justice Department's handling of the files. And instead of, you know, calming public concerns and listening to the testimony of survivors, she fanned the flames. During the hearing, Democrats slammed her for withholding information, mismanaging redactions, and failing to protect victims.
Ask them if that's true. Now, with the survivors and victims who are here, please stand up one more time. Just by show of hands, how many of you or your loved ones actually have met with the Department of Justice and provided testimony and estimate and uh evidence? None. And of those of you who have not met, which is everyone, how many of you have reached out either individually or through a lawyer or representative to offer to provide testimony and evidence? All of them. And of those you of you all of you who have reached out, how many of you were denied or ignored by the Department of Justice?
All of them. And despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Miss Bondi and her department to intimidate you, how many of you are still willing to speak to the Department of Justice? All of them. Well, Miss Bondi, it looks like you have some more witness.
And any want that Trump had to cool the tensions went out the window as the takeaway became the attorney general's testimony just deepened public suspicion. And here's what makes these poll numbers significant. The polls aren't isolated blips among one party or another. They actually show broad and persistent skepticism across party lines which coincides from the blowback from lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle. This is a majority mood.
I've not been one of the members who has glombmed on to this as an issue. I've sort of intentionally um deferred to others uh to find out about it. Um, but 9-year-old victims of that
all over the world. Moscow was the same too. It was sort of like a real global network that they're now getting to see on these four terminals they have outside.
Wow. Well, initially my reaction to all this was, I don't care. I don't know what the big deal is. Uh, but now I see what the big deal is and it was worth investigating and the members of Congress that have been pushing this were not wrong. So that's that's really my only reaction.
But Trump and Bondi and Caroline Levit, they keep saying that it's time to move on when survivors, the American public, hell, the world are saying, "Nah, that's not the case. There needs to be accountability.
We as a nation have an opportunity to send a strong message that we will not protect people who victimize children, that we will stand up for what is right despite what our politics are, that we will cross the aisle, and that we will stand behind survivors for justice. We keep hearing our press secretary and our Department of Justice and other government officials saying they're moving on from this. I wish that we could. I met Epstein Maxwell when I was 21 years old. I'm nearly 53 now. We cannot move on as survivors of this crime and as citizens of this nation without changing this narrative. So I ask you all to stand behind us and demand accountability for our government
because we certainly are going to. I mean think about it. There are resignations happening in major companies like Goldman Sachs. There are calls for prosecution in the United Kingdom. But here in the United States where Epstein was based, the simple question presented to the attorney general that she meet with those who have filed credible reports regarding those mentioned in the files is met with hyperbole and ad homonym attacks.
Former Prince Andrew Donald Trump attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein. I want to know were there any underage girls at that party or at any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein. This is so ridiculous and that they are trying to deflect from all the great things Donald Trump has done. There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime. Everyone knows that. This has been the most transparent presidency. He's the one that those reclaim my time. I got your answer. You said there's no evidence. Please stop the clock. My time the legislation. This This is my time belongs to the gentleman from California.
It does absolutely nothing to alter the narrative. It just makes people think you clearly have something to hide here.
Love this video. Support independent media and unlock exclusive content. Add free videos and custom emojis by becoming a paid member of our YouTube channel today. You can also gift memberships to others. Let's keep growing together.
Questions about this episode
Who speaks in "🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!"?
Jessica Talov (Guest), Cash Patel, Pam Bondi (Guest), Howard Lutnik, Donald Trump (Guest), John Oaf.
What is "🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!" about?
The discussion highlights Donald Trump's efforts to downplay his connections to Jeffrey Epstein amid growing scrutiny, particularly during a confrontational segment on Fox News where the host raises concerns about Trump's alleged ties to child sex trafficking. The conversation reveals tensions between Trump loyalists and those seeking accountability, emphasizing a stark contrast between Trump's…
What is mentioned in this MeidasTouch episode?
14 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, Jessica Talov, Goldman Sachs, National Review. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.
How long is "🚨 Trump LOSES IT as Fox host DROPS Epstein BOMBSHELL!"?
The episode runs 11 min; the transcript is about 1,838 words in 28 timestamped sections.
More from MeidasTouch
About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated February 15, 2026.