Transcript

Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!

From MeidasTouch · Episode page · Watch on YouTube

· 27 min · 4,198 words · 39 timestamped sections

This is the full, timestamped transcript of "Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!", an episode of MeidasTouch published January 17, 2026 (27 min, about 4,198 words). It mentions 14 people, works and ideas, including Donald Trump, Jake Auchincloss, United States (states), Sovereignty, Grock.

What this episode is about

A delegation of ten U.S. senators, both Republican and Democratic, traveled to Greenland to express bipartisan support against former President Donald Trump's threats toward the territory and NATO, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong international relationships. The visit aimed to reassure Greenland and Denmark of America's commitment to their sovereignty and partnership, with senators pledging to take action, including impeachment, should Trump pursue aggressive measures against them.

Key takeaways

  • Senate unity on Greenland signals a strong bipartisan commitment, transcending party lines for global security.
  • Impeachment claims hint at just how far senators are willing to go to protect diplomatic relationships.
  • Senator Shaheen's warning: NATO's cohesion is at risk if Trump-like rhetoric continues to disrupt alliances.
  • Greenlandic leaders emphasize dialogue over threats; the US could gain allies by simply asking instead of demanding.
  • With 225 years of partnership, the US must remember: diplomacy is often more effective than military posturing.

Who speaks in this episode?

What is discussed, and when

  1. – 5:00: United States (states), Donald Trump, Sovereignty, Bipartisanship
  2. – 10:00: United States (states), Grock, Donald Trump, Jake Auchincloss
  3. – 15:00: Sovereignty, United States (states), Jake Auchincloss, Critical Minerals
  4. – 20:00: United States (states), Donald Trump, Sovereignty, Energy Economy
  5. – 25:00: Jake Auchincloss, United States (states)

Notable quotes from "Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!"

  • This is from Senator Coons. let's play it. this is a 10 member bipartisan biccameal dialogue from the United States Senate and the United States House and we are grateful for your hospitality for 225 years of being.
    about Bipartisanship · at
  • An American military takeover of Greenland would threaten NATO as we know it. And even short of that, just the suggestion that the US would take Greenland by force does real damage not.
    about Jeanne Shaheen · at
  • Do certain things in Greenland, whether it's build more military bases, develop the critical minerals that are there, all we have to do is partner with you all. that's been made very clear.
    about Critical Minerals · at
  • I want to bring in Congress member Jake Alenclaus. I do want to talk about the Grock AI piece of it all. but Congress member, you're a Marine veteran. You served in Afghanistan.
    about Jake Auchincloss · at
  • So if you think about NATO, right, it's got an eastern flank where it is trying to defend Ukraine's sovereignty from Russian belligerence and now it has a western flank issue…
    about Sovereignty · at
  • China Sea in their nine-line projections. If you're the Philippines, a longtime US ally, watch out under Donald Trump because now you're in the Chinese sphere of influence. and…
    about Donald Trump · at
  • Has military experience in this part of the world. And our consensus is that this does not serve the interests of American national security or of the United States energy economy.
    about Foreign Policy · at
  • The masking, the indiscriminate policing tactics need to end because Americans deserve federal, state, and local law enforcement that uphold public safety as opposed to instilling fear in our neighborhoods.
    about United States (states) · at

Who and what is mentioned in this episode?

People

  • Donald Trump — Person · Primary referenced political actor · 5 mentions · first at
    Central figure behind the alleged threats to take Greenland by force, which drives the episode's discussion of NATO unity, sovereignty, and U.S. foreign policy consequences.
  • Jake Auchincloss — Person · Main guest (interviewee) · 3 mentions · first at
    Provides analysis linking Greenland rhetoric to NATO strategy, Russia/China incentives, and critiques the Grock/DoD deal and ICE tactics.
  • Jeanne Shaheen — Person · Referenced senator / key warning voice · 4 mentions
    Warns that takeover rhetoric threatens NATO, damages alliances, and benefits Russia/China; emphasizes partnership alternatives for bases and minerals.
  • Christopher Coons — Person · Referenced delegation leader · 4 mentions
    Identified as leading the bipartisan delegation and articulating NATO principles and Greenland's right to decide its future.
    To my friend... leader of our delegation, Senator Coons.
  • J. D. Vance — Person · Referenced administration figure · 1 mention · first at
    Mentioned as allegedly telling Greenland/Denmark officials the U.S. intends to 'conquer' them, contributing to the episode's coercion narrative.
    Briefed about it. where you had the foreign minister of Greenland and Denmark show up. Apparently JD Vance and Marco Rubio continued to say, No, we want to conquer you. We're…

Products & tech

  • Grock — Product · Core tech product discussed · 2 mentions · first at
    Discussed as an AI model being integrated into Defense Department networks and criticized for enabling deepfake pornography and concentrating power in Elon Musk.
    Frontier AI model company to join Genai.mill and that is Grock from X AI which will go live later this month. So I want to thank you Elon and your incredible team for leaning…

Concepts & topics

  • Sovereignty — Concept · Core normative principle · 5 mentions · first at
    Repeated as a NATO principle and as the basis for opposing coercion toward Greenland and defending Ukraine against Russian aggression.
  • Artificial Intelligence — Concept · Core technology theme · 4 mentions
    AI is discussed in the context of Defense Department adoption and societal harms (information gatekeeping, deepfakes), raising governance and security concerns.
    Thank you Elon and your incredible team for leaning forward with us on this as well. Very soon we will have the world's leading AI models on every unclassified and classified network throughout our department. long overdue.
  • Critical Minerals — Concept · Strategic resource theme · 2 mentions · first at
    Presented as a legitimate area for U.S.-Greenland partnership, contrasted with coercive takeover rhetoric; also tied to committee jurisdiction.
  • Bipartisanship — Concept · Framing device for delegation legitimacy · 1 mention · first at
    The delegation is repeatedly described as bipartisan to signal broad U.S. institutional opposition to threats and support for allies.
  • Foreign Policy — Concept · Analytical lens · 1 mention · first at
    The episode evaluates U.S. actions toward Greenland, NATO, Ukraine, and Venezuela as a coherent (or incoherent) foreign policy approach.
  • Energy Economy — Concept · Policy impact frame · 1 mention · first at
    Used to argue Venezuela-related actions do not serve U.S. national security or the U.S. energy economy, tying foreign policy to domestic economic interests.
    This does not serve the interests of American national security or of the United States energy economy.

Places & events

  • United States (states) — Place · Primary state actor context · 15 mentions · first at
    The U.S. Senate delegation, U.S. foreign policy posture, and domestic actions (ICE tactics, DoD AI adoption) are discussed as shaping alliance credibility and security.
  • World War II — Event · Historical reference · 1 mention · first at
    Invoked to contextualize U.S. basing history in Greenland and personal family service, reinforcing longstanding security ties.
    Many of the United States once operated 17 bases in Greenland. As I said, my father was stationed there in World War II. it was the United States that determined that we were going to close those 16 other bases.

Full transcript with timestamps

United States senators from both parties, Republicans and Democrats and independents, sent a delegation of 10 senators to Greenland to Nuke where they wanted to send a powerful message to the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark. We have your back and we on a bipartisan basis in the United States do not support Donald Trump's threats against Greenland, against Denmark, against NATO. If he moves on Greenland and NATO, we will make sure that he is impeached, that he is thrown out, that he is convicted, that he is gone, and we will use all of our resources in the United States Senate to ensure that there is not an invasion. and we will do everything to protect you. I mean, you had Republican senators there like Mowski uh and Tillis and others joining with Democrats like Shaheen uh and um and Coons and others. Let me show you what went down when the United States senators were there in Greenland in Nuke

standing side by side with Greenlandic and Denmark lawmakers, the prime minister of Denmark, the prime minister or premier of Greenland. First, here is Marcowski uh in her speech that she gave. Short clip. Um let's play it. And this is from Nuke. Play this clip.

Thank you. Thank you for your continued friendship, your leadership, and to my friend and the leader of our delegation, Senator Coons, thank you for for leading such a strong bipartisan and as you point out, biccameal delegation. I think that that's important. I think it's important that it it be recognized that when it comes to matters of relationships with our friends, with our allies, as we have here in Denmark, as we have uh in in Greenland, uh that it is it is not a subject of Republicans versus Democrats. It is a recognition again of a strong and a continuing uh relationship over over decades. Uh it is one that we need to nurture. As with all relationships, you need to nurture and take care of them and you need to have constructive dialogue. And and as has been noted, there's not only been good dialogue here at the parliament today uh but this morning earlier with the prime minister of both Greenland and of

Denmark. Just yesterday in Washington DC, we had visits with the foreign ministers of both Greenland and Denmark. So constructive important dialogue that is ongoing now and will move forward. So it is it's important to be here. I think presence means a lot and this uh again bipartisan delegation to be here with our partners is important. So thank you for the opportunity to to share the time and again the fellowship. We appreciate it.

This is from Senator Coons. Uh let's play it. Um, this is a 10 member bipartisan biccameal dialogue from the United States Senate and the United States House and we are grateful for your hospitality for 225 years of being a good and trusted ally and partner. We had a strong and robust dialogue about how we extend that into the future. We expressed our gratitude for the sacrifice of Danes who served and fought and died alongside Americans when we were attacked 25 years ago. We spoke about the value of NATO and the commitment to respecting the core principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and self-determination. And we spoke with clarity about the importance that the people of Greenland make their decisions about their future.

So, it was a constructive and hopeful dialogue and we look forward to continuing.

Next, I'll show you what a Greenlandic lawmaker had to say. Play this clip. It was really important for us at the in the Greenlandic government to attend this meeting with the senators and representatives because we have really wanted to have a dialogue with them. And dialogue is first and foremost really important for us. And I hope we can continue and I hope it is the first of many many more dialogues we can have in the future because we are a member of NATO and we are happy to cooperate through NATO and uh I think we have lots and much more to work with each other on in these situations because NATO has been here for many many years and we hope that it will stay uh many more years to come. Thank you.

And next, we'll show you what Senator Shaheen said and warned Donald Trump about. Here, play this clip.

An American military takeover of Greenland would threaten NATO as we know it. And even short of that, just the suggestion that the US would take Greenland by force does real damage not just to the relationship with Greenland, with Denmark, but to America's own national security. It erodess decades of hard one confidence among allies and it weakens the sense of security that comes with it and that rhetoric plays right into the hands of our greatest adversaries, Russia and China. Vladimir Putin would welcome any move that fractures NATO or diverts attention and resources away from Ukraine. It's a point that your prime minister made um again when we met with her this morning and she's made very eloquently over a period of time. If we're serious about limiting Russia's influence in the Arctic and beyond, the most effective way to do that is by defeating Vladimir Putin in Ukraine. And that's precisely

why the current debate over Greenland makes so little sense. As your prime minister and Greenlandic officials have said, if the United States wants to do certain things in Greenland, whether it's build more military bases, um develop the critical minerals that are there, all we have to do is partner with you all. that's been made very clear. We've had a standing treaty with Greenland dating back to 1951. And as many of you know, the United States once operated 17 bases in Greenland. As I said, my father was stationed there in World War II. Um, it was the United States that determined that we were going to close those 16 other bases.

So whether it's US bases to defend against Arctic threats or critical mineral deals, your leaders here in Denmark and in Greenland have made clear that they want to partner with us. So I think the threats are not only unnecessary, they are counterproductive. They risk undermining not just our relationship with all of you in Denmark, with the people of Greenland, but the broader NATO alliance in the process. I know there are real deep concerns here in Denmark and in Greenland. Yesterday we met with your foreign minister and with the foreign minister of Greenland.

Um they talked in very personal terms about how particularly people in Greenland who were thinking about um their foreign minister talked about children going to bed at night worried about whether when they got up in the morning they were going to have been invaded by the United States. Now I can see why that feels personal to people. I believe sainer heads will prevail. I believe that because we have institutions that are acting in the United States on both sides of the aisle in Congress, there's overwhelming support for our relationship for NATO.

And among the American people, I don't know if you all saw the recent poll that showed that 86% of Americans said they would oppose the use of military force in Greenland. And while the Trump regime continues its threats to invade Greenland and as we have various European countries now sp sending special forces uh to Greenland to protect it from a United States invasion. You also have the Secretary of Defense who unlawfully refers to himself as the Secretary of War, Pete Hegsith, announced a major deal with Elon Musk to put Grock, the AI that uh Elon Musk has on X to now go through all of the classified systems and all of the systems at the Department of Defense and to basically, you know, run it here.

Just just watch what HGet said. But today we're excited to announce the next frontier AI model company to join Genai.mill and that is Grock from X AI which will go live later this month. So I want to thank you Elon and your incredible team for leaning forward with us on this as well. Very soon we will have the world's leading AI models on every unclassified and classified network throughout our department. long overdue.

I want to bring in Congress member Jake Alenclaus. I do want to talk about the Grock AI piece of it all. Uh but Congress member, you're a Marine veteran. You served in Afghanistan. Uh you led a team in Panama. Uh you you have a lot of experience on foreign policy. You saw this meeting that transpired or you've heard about it, you've learned about it, you've been briefed about it. um where you had the foreign minister of Greenland and Denmark show up. Apparently JD Vance and Marco Rubio continued to say, "No, we want to conquer you. We're going to conquer you." And then it kind of ended pretty quickly this meeting. We we've been seeing footage this morning of the uh Greenlandic minister almost kind of getting very emotional on TV because the people there are are traumatized right now within Greenland. think they're going to be invaded at at any moment.

Um, what what do you make of this all, Ben? Thanks for having me back on. He should be emotional. He's defending the sovereignty and self-determination of his people. Americans certainly get emotional about that when it affects our patriotic allegiance to the United States of America. Let me before we talk about current events with Greenland, just rewind the clock to 2019. So in 2019, the Danish intelligence services uncovered a Russian false flag operation in which Russia was falsifying documents purporting to show that the United States was trying to seize Greenland from Denmark. And the reason that Russia and its intelligence services was committed to this operation is that they knew that that false flag operation would sow discord amongst NATO and thereby empower the Kremlin as it attacked or prepared to attack NATO's allies on Europe's eastern flank. Well, the Danish intelligence services found

out and debunked this false flag operation in 2019. But it turns out that Russia need not have even bothered to use its intelligence services because the American president is doing exactly what they were trying to do with covert services six years ago. What this American president is doing is sewing discord in NATO at a time when NATO needs to be strong and unified as it defends its eastern flank and two driving Greenland directly into the arms of the Russia's of the Russian and Chinese governments. I served on the select committee on China last Congress to this Congress I served on energy and commerce which has jurisdiction over critical minerals. I will tell you what the president is talking about with national security interests by seizing Greenland has zero efficacy. There is nothing he is saying that makes any sense from a national security perspective. We have everything we need when it comes to our military alliance

with Denmark, a founding member of NATO. A lot of, you know, look, Trump has been talking about taking over Greenland now for a long period of time. It does though seem that it accelerated recently about the time where you had the Russian envoys meeting in Miami though with Witoff and with Kushner. That was that weekend in Miami. Uh then there's that announcement like literally the next day that Landry, the governor from Louisiana would be a special envoy and then to Greenland and then Landry starts talking about yeah we want to take it over. That's why I'm becoming uh an envoy. And you know, I'm not trying to find links where they don't exist, but when you share the story about 2019 of Russia covert operations, wanting to sew discord by uh planting that seed of threats to the sovereignty of of Greenland, and then to see, you know, these these top Russian officials show up, meet with out, meet with Kushner and

meet with Witoff, and then all of a sudden a special envoy gets appointed to Greenland and all these talks accelerate. What are we not talking about right now? You and I will talk about it now, but we're talking less about Ukraine and is there going to be a peace deal there? And with all of these conflrations across the world, Ukraine now is kind of gets pushed to the bottom of the list, which is what Putin wants.

Ben, you're putting your finger on it. So if you think about NATO, right, it's got an eastern flank where it is trying to defend Ukraine's sovereignty from Russian belligerence and now it has a western flank issue where it's trying to defend Greenland from American belligerence. This plays directly into Putin's hands. And the link, I think, is twofold. First, that 28-point plan that the president initially proposed for Ukrainian peace, eight of those 28 points were non-starters. One of those points was joint Russian United States minerals mining and oil ventures. Well, where would those joint ventures happen? In Greenland. And that does two things for the Russian government. One is it ties it back in to a lot of western trade and commercial exchanges that it had been iced out of after its invasion of Ukraine and the Russian government needs those sources of revenue. And two, to your point, it

demoralizes, disorients, and distracts NATO from what needs to be its singular focus, which is defending the sovereignty not just of Ukraine, but of all the Baltic states.

Yeah. And when we're that exact conversation, you're having minerals and other resources, oil, Venezuela, and you know, having Deli who's very close with Putin and Lavrov and Iran and China, the authoritarians still run Venezuela along with Diodos Cabo, Maduro's enforcer. Keep the Maduro regime in place. become in Trump's mind an owner with Russia now becoming more of a renter of of of the resources there. You know, are is this all part of the framework that Rubio set out about spheres of influence and that Russia has all of Europe and Russia and all that area? Xi Jinping, China has all of Asia, the US, Greenland Canada Mexico Venezuela anything in its hemisphere. And then to Europe, what you're saying, then they then they trade the resources and you know where something like Iran comes in is it gets a little murkier because that's not necessarily in these spheres.

So you've got Trump saying to the people of Iran who are protesting, I've got your back. He said it on January second. If a single protester gets killed, I got you. We're going to help. The protests start to grow. There's anywhere from thousands to tens of thousands. We don't know the number of people who have been slaughtered but right it could be we've heard huge number we've heard all different types of numbers and now we're getting conflicting reports. I mean there may be strikes in Iran but there seems to be now lots of push back against that from Russia and else. So so I I don't these are the kind of conversations that what are you making of of all of that together?

I think in a first order approximation you are right that the spheres of influence mentality deeply influences MAGA and this administration they view it as the manifestation of their America first mentality. So you United States's western hemisphere as you said China gets to do Asia Pacific including Taiwan and potentially Singapore definitely Hong Kong all the way through the South China Sea in their nine-line uh projections. If you're the Philippines, a longtime US ally, watch out under Donald Trump because now you're in the Chinese sphere of influence. Um, and that, you know, Russia gets to have its kind of traditional Slavic empire. I think that is a first order approximation. What I think you are, um, not maybe not discounting, but maybe maybe uh under representing is how much crony capitalism and just downright corruption can influence that. like yeah the first order of approximation I think

Donald Trump finds that kind of appealing but hey you buy some meme coins from the guy and it's all for sale right so that is what I think is going to happen with the Venezuelan oil where yeah that's the he thinks that's the United States sphere of influence but he's kind of open to being bought out of that mentality and what he has refused to do is rule out US boots on the ground in Venezuela now my boots have been on the ground in Latin America And uh I recently just this morning teamed up with James Tarico who is the state representative from from Texas running for United States Senate in Texas as a Democrat. And the two of us provided our perspective on what the president is doing in Venezuela uh as someone seeking to represent Texans, the oil producing capital of the world uh and someone who has military experience in this part of the world. And our consensus is that this does not serve the interests of

American national security or of the United States energy economy. And touching on the crony capitalism or just the self-deing part, where is the oil money from Venezuela going to bank accounts in Qatar? We learned is going to be holding a lot of this oil money. And it's like why would it be going to bank accounts in Qatar versus you know anyway

Ben how how are the Qataris supposed to afford to buy jets for the president if they don't have Venezuelan money please I mean makes all the sense in the world

let's talk about the Grock piece of it but before hitting there I mean we we if you look at what's happening now in in Minneapolis and St. Paul and the thousands of ICE forces in militarized gear who were there marching around and we've been following these protests closely and by and large the protests are peaceful and uh overwhelmingly peaceful. And what you would observe with all the people on the ground watching is these agents would roll in. They start pointing their weapons in people's faces and then they start throwing chemical agents at people who are on the sides of the road. They killed a woman, Renee Nicole. Good. Um they they they've shot other people and then provide stories that often don't match what happens when you learn the next the next few days of what what really happened and they they they terrorize these communities and they're trying to you know now they're talking

about insurrection act and all of these things. It's like this was their design to create something that looked like a war zone that they created the scenery and and what what what do you make of it? I mean, you've seen the ICE tactics in Massachusetts as well. Um, not to the extent in Minneapolis, but horrific stuff has happened in Massachusetts. We've been following. So, what do you make all of it as someone who's actually served in the military in major operations, led teams to see how ICE is behaving in the United States now?

ICE has morphed under this administration from an arm of the law to an instrument of fear. They have used bounties and social media advertising to recruit individuals. They have then given them barebones five weeks of training before sending out these individuals with firearms into combustible situations that ICE itself, as you have said, has engineered to be uh far more dangerous and contentious than would be necessary for civil immigration enforcement. And Minnesota is ground zero for uh this operation. ICE needs to be reformed, retrained.

Uh the masking, the indiscriminate uh policing tactics need to end uh because Americans deserve federal, state, and local law enforcement that uphold public safety as opposed to uh instilling fear in our neighborhoods.

Talk about the Gro AI piece. Um there's a lot of issues there and I know you've been concerned about how Grock AI has been used and can be used domestically. Now it's also going to be used as a lever of uh defense and going through classified documents and that likely will also play into though how it could be used against citizens. So So talk us through all of that.

Ben, I don't even know where to start on this one. On the the first is power. Uh right now the three most influential gatekeepers of news, information, entertainment in the world are Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and through its ownership of Tik Tok, the Chinese Communist Party. Those are the big three. That's a problem on its face that we have allowed billions of people to access uh information that is filtered through the algorithms controlled by those three actors. Now you are fusing that control over ideas and narrative with hard instruments of economic and military power vested in Elon Musk. Americans got to see Elon Musk in action over the first six months of this Trump administration and it was an unmitigated disaster of not just incompetence and cronyism but also corruption. They went in claiming they were going to save hundreds of billions of dollars. They instead eviscerated critical services

that Americans rely on like the pharmaceutical testing laboratory in St. Louis that make sure that your eye drops don't blind you. Uh and there after costing taxpayers huge sums of money and trying to target social security they ended up uh sending one package to Congress to cut $9 billion from the federal budget. Those nine billion dollars were saved by ending PBS and polio vaccines. So that's Elon Musk uh in action. And now we're trying to give him a fusion of both ideological and state power. Totally unacceptable.

I want to dig in though in particular to what he has unleashed with Grock because Grock is probably the worst example of these AI bots generating non-consensual deep fake pornography where individuals can upload photographs of victims and then turn that uh into uh intimate privacy violations. Grock was the epicenter for that. They got criticized for it. And then you know what they did, Ben? They turned that feature from a free into a premium product so that now the digital harassment of women becomes another way for Elon Musk to make money. The speaker of the house has said he wants to end this. I have bipartisan legislation that would directly stop it. The deep fake liability act the speaker needs to put on the house floor next week.

Before we go, anything else that you think is not getting enough attention that you want to raise or or or address with our audience of nearly 6 million people?

You know, the uh the health insurance CEOs are coming to Congress in a couple weeks and there's a lot that we can talk about. What I am going to focus on is some indepth terrific reporting that was done by a firm called Hunterbrook where they looked in to how the big three health insurance corporations Sigma, CVS, Caremark, and United Health Group are using overseas drug pricing middlemen uh known as group purchasing organizations to evade taxes to engage in collusive behavior and to price gouge prescription drugs. This is a story that I think uh is undertold when we talk about the US health care system because it's big dollars. It's direct impact to patients who need access to these prescription drugs. And it's also a summation of so much of what frustrates Americans about this economy, which is a small group of monopolies abusing their market power to take advantage of people when they are at their most vulnerable.

Always great to have you on, Congressman. Let's have you back on soon. Let's chat more. Appreciate your perspective on Greenland, especially given your service and as you've said, actually having boots on the ground versus, you know, it seems sometimes that this regime talks about things like a game of war versus what what that really means when talking about putting service members lives on. So, thank you.

My pleasure. And I'll keep an eye out for for Pablo, too. Everybody hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million subscribers. He's talking about Pablo Monriquez, the new Washington DC bureau, the Midas Touch Network. Thanks everybody. Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to our Substack at midasplus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron Philipki, ad free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content only available at midasplus.com.

Questions about this episode

Who speaks in "Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!"?

Ben (Guest), Congress member Jake Alenclaus (Guest), Senator Coons (Guest), Senator Shaheen (Guest), Marcowski (Guest).

What is "Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!" about?

A delegation of ten U.S. senators, both Republican and Democratic, traveled to Greenland to express bipartisan support against former President Donald Trump's threats toward the territory and NATO, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong international relationships. The visit aimed to reassure Greenland and Denmark of America's commitment to their sovereignty and partnership, with…

What is mentioned in this MeidasTouch episode?

14 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Donald Trump, Jake Auchincloss, United States (states), Sovereignty, Grock, Artificial Intelligence. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.

How long is "Trump LOSES IT as GOP Senators Pick Greenland…OVER HIM!!!"?

The episode runs 27 min; the transcript is about 4,198 words in 39 timestamped sections.

More from MeidasTouch

About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated January 24, 2026.