Transcript
‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges
From MS NOW · Episode page · Watch on YouTube
· 12 min · 1,937 words · 17 timestamped sections
This is the full, timestamped transcript of "‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges", an episode of MS NOW published February 13, 2026 (12 min, about 1,937 words). It mentions 12 people, works and ideas, including Don Lemon, Donald Trump, First Amendment, Justice Department, Angelo Carusone.
What this episode is about
Journalist Don Lemon has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy against religious freedom related to his coverage of a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Legal experts suggest the charges, deemed constitutionally flawed, may ultimately be dismissed, highlighting concerns about the implications for First Amendment protections and press freedom under the current administration.
Key takeaways
- Don Lemon's indictment shines a spotlight on the Trump administration's chilling approach to press freedom.
- The Justice Department's novel legal theory may be weak, but it underscores a dangerous trend in political retaliation.
- As Lemon puts it, 'the process is the punishment'—a chilling reminder of power's capacity to silence dissent.
- Arrests of journalists mark a constitutional crisis, as political figures face intimidation rather than accountability.
- This saga reflects a war on truth—disturbing when the cost of speaking out outweighs the courage to do so.
Who speaks in this episode?
- Don Lemon (Guest) · 2 min speaking
- Angelo Carusone (Guest) · 3 min speaking
- John Heilman (Guest) · 3 min speaking
- Michael Feinberg (Guest) · 4 min speaking
What is discussed, and when
- – 3:00: Don Lemon, First Amendment, Justice Department, Donald Trump
- – 6:00: Don Lemon, Donald Trump, Justice Department, Adam Schiff
- – 9:00: Don Lemon, Angelo Carusone, Michael Feinberg, John Heilman
- – 11:42: Justice Department, Don Lemon, Donald Trump, Michael Feinberg
Notable quotes from "‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges"
The power and protection of the First Amendment has been the underpinning of my work.
about Don Lemon · atAs well as anyone who dares to cover the truth or point out the truth or criticize Donald Trump.
about Donald Trump · atWe see them attacking members of the media with the arrest of Don Lemon in a way that we have never seen before.
about Corey Booker · atIn the Trump administration's war on the press is where we start today president of media matters for america angelo carison is here also joining us puck news senior political columnist national affairs analyst john heilman is back.
about Angelo Carusone · atLet me unpack each of those points that Angela makes.
about John Heilman · at
Who and what is mentioned in this episode?
People
- Don Lemon — Person · Central subject (referenced journalist/defendant) · 10 mentions · first at
The segment centers on Lemon being federally charged after covering a church protest, framed as a Trump-era test of First Amendment protections and press intimidation. - Donald Trump — Person · Primary antagonist (referenced political figure) · 5 mentions · first at
Portrayed as driving a broader campaign to weaponize DOJ against critics and the press; the prosecution is framed as part of a Trump administration strategy. - Angelo Carusone — Person · Main guest (referenced as in-studio/remote guest) · 2 mentions · first at
Appears as president of Media Matters to discuss how legal pressure and investigations function as punishment and deterrence against media organizations. - Michael Feinberg — Person · Panelist / legal-national security analyst (guest) · 3 mentions · first at
Provides perspective on DOJ processes, the cost of prosecutions, and institutional degradation, emphasizing how even unsuccessful cases punish defendants.Senior political columnist national affairs analyst john heilman is back and former assistant special agent in charge at the fbi national security and intelligence analyst…
- John Heilman — Person · Panelist / analyst (guest) · 2 mentions · first at
Introduced as a senior political columnist and national affairs analyst contributing political analysis of the administration’s approach and media targeting. - Elisa Slotkin — Person · Referenced expert / cited authority (U.S. Senator) · 1 mention · first at
Quoted to support the theme that intimidation—rather than legal success—is the point of bringing cases against political opponents/critics.As Senator Lissa Slotkin said about the case, the Justice Department tried to bring against her and failed to do, quote, the intimidation was the point, to get other people beyond us to think.
- Corey Booker — Person · Referenced expert / cited authority (U.S. Senator) · 1 mention · first at
Quoted describing a 'constitutional crisis' and alleged abuses of law enforcement power, situating Lemon’s case within a broader pattern. - Adam Schiff — Person · Referenced example (U.S. Senator/Rep. in context) · 2 mentions · first at
Cited as another alleged target of 'trumped up charges,' used to argue a broader pattern of politicized investigations.Where I've seen Alex Padilla thrown to the ground and put in handcuffs, where Adam Schiff has trumped up charges where they're focusing on.
- Alex Padilla — Person · Referenced example (U.S. Senator) · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as an example of alleged aggressive treatment of elected officials, reinforcing the claim of escalating governmental overreach.Even in the United States Senate, where I've seen Alex Padilla thrown to the ground and put in handcuffs, where Adam Schiff has trumped up charges where they're focusing on.
Companies & orgs
- Justice Department — Company · Key institution · 8 mentions · first at
Critically discussed for its role in prosecuting Don Lemon and its perceived politicization under the Trump administrationAs Senator Lissa Slotkin said about the case, the Justice Department tried to bring against her and failed to do, quote, the intimidation was the point, to get other people beyond us to think twice about speaking out.
- Media Matters for America — Company · Referenced organization · 1 mention · first at
Mentioned as an example of organizations targeted by the Trump administration's policiesIn the Trump administration's war on the press is where we start today president of media matters for america angelo carison is here also joining us puck news senior political columnist national affairs analyst john heilman is back.
Concepts & topics
- First Amendment — Concept · Core topic · 4 mentions · first at
Central to the discussion about press freedom and the legal case against journalist Don LemonThe power and protection of the First Amendment has been the underpinning of my work.
Full transcript with timestamps
A NEW CHAPTER TODAY IN WHAT IS A TEST CASE FOR THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND ITS MULTIFRONT ASSAULT on activities long protected by our First Amendment. Journalist Don Lemon pleaded not guilty in court to two counts. They include conspiracy against right of religious freedom. He was charged after covering a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota last month. Here's what he had to say after his arraignment today. The power and protection of the First Amendment has been the underpinning of my work. The First Amendment, the freedom of the press, the bedrock of OF OUR DEMOCRACY, THE EVENTS BEFORE MY ARREST AND WHAT'S HAPPENED SINCE, SO THAT PEOPLE ARE FINALLY REALIZING WHAT THIS ADMINISTRATION IS ALL ABOUT.
I WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED, I WILL NOT BACK DOWN, I WILL FIGHT THESE BASELESS CHARGES AND I WILL NOT BE I WILL NOT BE SILENCED. JOHN LEMON FACES IN A FACT A CIVIL RIGHTS CASE AND ONE SO FLIMSY THAT MANY ATTORNEYS WHO USED TO WORK AT THE JUSTICE Department's Civil Rights Division believe it will ultimately be dismissed. Legal experts telling CBS News this, quote, the indictment against journalist Don Lemon and eight others will likely be dismissed because it hinges on a charge that is viewed as so constitutionally flawed that the Justice Department Civil Rights Division has never attempted to use it to prosecute interference in a house of worship.
That novel theory of the law comes on top of a set of alternative facts presented in the actual indictment by the Justice Department. On that, The Washington Post reports this, quote, The January 29th indictment calls the nine defendants agitators and says they, quote, entered the church in a coordinated takeover style attack. In multiple instances, it describes the alleged conduct of the two journalists and the protesters collectively. Experts said that if Lemon was operating as a journalist during the January 8th protest at City's church in St. Paul, rather than as a participant that could undermine accusations that he was part of a conspiracy or that he intended to interfere with protected rights during the approximately 45 minutes that Lemon livestreamed at the church, he conducted interviews and repeatedly identified himself as a reporter while also voicing sympathy for the protesters' cause.
But the facts of the case and the law underpinning the case are, of course, secondary to what Donald Trump is trying to achieve here. As Don Lemon himself puts it, quote, the process is the punishment. So whatever happens in this case, the Trump administration, is doing what Don Lemon said they're doing. They're hoping to intimidate Don Lemon and other members of the press, as well as anyone who dares to cover the truth or point out the truth or criticize Donald Trump. They're hoping to raise the cost of speaking out to the point where fewer and fewer people actually do it.
As Senator Lissa Slotkin said about the case, the Justice Department tried to bring against her and failed to do, quote, the intimidation was the point, to get other people beyond us to think twice about speaking out. The case today is also part and parcel of a war against institutions we're seeing waged all over the country. Here's how Senator Cory Booker puts it. Well, I'm seeing an abuse of the rule of law, abuse of the power of the justice system in ways that are stunning and it didn't start with this incident.
Remember they arrested the mayor of my city. The judge laughed it out of court, but they put him in handcuffs. They detained him for hours. We see them attacking members of the media with the arrest of Don Lemon in a way that we have never seen before. So we are now in this constitutional crisis, where we have a Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security that are using their police powers in ways that I think most Americans never would imagine that they would be seeing. Even in the United States Senate, where I've seen Alex Padilla thrown to the ground and put in handcuffs, where Adam Schiff has trumped up charges where they're focusing on.
Even the head of the Fed suddenly found himself under criminal investigation by the FBI. All of us should be alarmed by what is happening to our rights and to the Constitution. They're going after senators. They're going after people in our communities. It is to me a constitutional crisis. Charges against journalist Don Lemon may marking a new stage in the Trump administration's war on the press is where we start today president of media matters for america angelo carison is here also joining us puck news senior political columnist national affairs analyst john heilman is back and former assistant special agent in charge at the fbi national security and intelligence analyst michael feinberg is also back he's also a fellow at law fair angelo i want to start with you um and i don't want to put you on the spot here but i know your organization has been targeted um don lemon has long been um someone who got
under donald trump's skin donald trump at least believes that he's part of the reason that don lemon is no longer at cnn i'm not sure that's rooted in too much truth um donald trump's attacks against the press are legendary they're incessant and what is different i suppose is that in 2.0 he has the free reign to use the justice department to intimidate threaten cause journalists and media organizations to incur massive legal fees um and i just wonder if you can speak to this moment in this part of the trump story which is a little opaque to people not experiencing this yeah i mean there's something you said during your intro really resonated it you know obviously the process is the punishment but there was another part that stuck out to me which is that he experts say that, you know, that the government is unlikely to succeed in these prosecutions.
Sure. But it's still extraordinarily painful. Experts have been saying that about my situation for a couple of years now and I'm still knee-deep in it every day. And, you know, and I have confidence in those experts' assessments, but that doesn't change the calculus here. They are willing to do these extraordinary things because they recognize that the process itself is the punishment, and the intention is to stop, you know, opponents or those they view as opposition from doing that work so that they then can get even fast, they can even execute their plans and their intentions faster, stronger, longer, you know, be more effective.
So that, I mean, it's a real thing. And, you know, it has lots of reverberations and broader consequences. And underneath all of that is that they didn't just have an intention to go after journalists. They had a plan. They did have a plan. And that plan was everything from, you know, at a foundational level, changing over and breaking norms at the Department of Justice and getting rid of the people that would even try to uphold those norms so that then you could start to do these kinds of things. You know, this prosecution effort is one as one step in their larger assaults against journalists.
But they've done a whole bunch of other stuff, too. They've made it easier to subpoena records, to get all kinds of investigations into journalists. They rescinded a whole bunch of rules and protections at the DOJ when it came to stiffing around what journalists were doing. All that's gone. And so the exposure is there and the tools are there for them to use that exposure to then attack and go after opponents. And day in, day out, we see a sort of people folding, I mean, broadly speaking. But then there are fighters.
And that's the important thing we shouldn't lose sight of, people like Don Lemon and others that didn't just immediately cop a deal, that are out there making advocacy work, you know, Media Matters and others. And that's what we have to do. We have to just continue to fight ahead. Let me unpack each of those points that Angela makes. There's the sort of, they've operationalized the smear, the target, and then turning the government on the targets in the press. This is sort of what that pipeline looks like. These are right-wing media figures calling for Don Lemon's arrest.
And so this is you know hopefully just the beginning and as we know Don Lemon needs to be the next to fall. On top of that I would throw in trespass, disorderly conduct, disturbing a religious meeting which were normally state crimes. Look, Don Lemon could be prosecuted as a willing participant. He committed trespass. He appears as you and I discussed last night to have embedded himself in the mob. If I were the federal prosecutor here, I would charge, yes, the FACE Act. I would charge civil rights. I would charge conspiracy.
I would charge obstruction of free exercise of religion. I would charge federal trespass, harassment, a whole host of things. And on the state level, child endangerment too. Michael Feinberg, those are pundits on TV and we are all pundits on TV. So no hate at pundits. But never before has there been an administration that governs and takes their lead from pundits on TV. And so just to illustrate this, this pipelining of the smear, um, the seed, they know Donald Trump is always watching television. Um, and they have a justice department now that operationalizes these political vendettas.
Just talk about, um, not how far from normal that is, but how dangerous that is for people that don't have access to all of the platforms that Don Lemon does. It's incredibly dangerous, simply because I don't know that the average citizen who's not meshed in this world realizes. But even if you win a case against the Justice Department, whether it's a civil trial or you're found not guilty in a criminal trial, it is an incredibly expensive time-consuming and emotionally draining process just to go through. And that's normally why before an indictment or a lawsuit is ever brought in the first place, DOJ would normally have a whole system of differently-ranked people who would need to approve the charging document or the complaint.
But what we've seen happen over the past year is the overwhelming majority of those ranks have been either fired or quit in disgust, so the only ones left are the ones that tend to watch the pundits we just watched and yeah you know at the at the risk of getting glib in any grouper class of people or professions. There's going to be a bell curve of intelligence. And I'd humbly suggest that the pundits we just watched are probably at the left tail of that particular bell curve and not the ones that the Justice Department should be relying on for legal analysis.
Well, so where does it put the people at the Justice Department on that bell curve if they follow them? I would simply note that for almost the entirety of the Justice Department's existence, it was incredibly rare for them to ever see an indictment get dismissed or to not be able to get a true bill out of a grand jury. And we are now at occur regularly for the first time in our nation's 250-year history. Yeah.
Questions about this episode
Who speaks in "‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges"?
Don Lemon (Guest), Angelo Carusone (Guest), John Heilman (Guest), Michael Feinberg (Guest).
What is "‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges" about?
Journalist Don Lemon has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiracy against religious freedom related to his coverage of a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Legal experts suggest the charges, deemed constitutionally flawed, may ultimately be dismissed, highlighting concerns about the implications for First Amendment protections and press freedom under the current administration.
What is mentioned in this MS NOW episode?
12 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Don Lemon, Donald Trump, First Amendment, Justice Department, Angelo Carusone, Michael Feinberg. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.
How long is "‘The process is the punishment’: Don Lemon pleads not guilty to 'constitutionally flawed' charges"?
The episode runs 12 min; the transcript is about 1,937 words in 17 timestamped sections.
More from MS NOW
About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated February 15, 2026.