Transcript
The Hidden Machinery of ChatGPT, Explained by Stephen Wolfram
From Young and Profiting · Episode page · Watch on YouTube
· 1 h 9 min · 13,100 words · 98 timestamped sections
This is the full, timestamped transcript of "The Hidden Machinery of ChatGPT, Explained by Stephen Wolfram", an episode of Young and Profiting published December 11, 2025 (1 h 9 min, about 13,100 words). It mentions 43 people, works and ideas, including Steven Wolfram, language, neural nets, Computational thinking, Intelligence.
What this episode is about
The discussion explores the transformative role of AI as it automates human tasks, highlighting the extensive potential of AI systems compared to the limited scope of human computation. Dr. Stephen Wolfram, a leading expert in computational science, delves into the mechanics of neural networks and large language models, raising questions about AI's potential sentience and its implications for human consciousness.
Key takeaways
- AI's rise parallels space race: Both were 'just around the corner' half a century ago.
- Neural nets: Invented in 1943, feared now for speed, not novelty.
- AI's infinite potential dwarfs human concerns—welcome to the uncharted computing universe.
- Invention vs. adoption: Ideas age like wine; some get tastier, others forgotten.
- AI exposes thin veil between human genius and computational routine.
What is discussed, and when
- – 10:00: Intelligence, AI Vault series, Computational science, Computational thinking
- – 20:00: neural nets, Antiquity, language, $75 sponsored job credit
- – 30:00: language, Computational X, A New Kind of Science, Computational thinking
- – 40:00: neural nets, language
- – 50:00: computational irreducibility, principle of computational equivalence, language
- – 1:00:00: language, computational universe, Intelligence, Computational thinking
- – 1:08:50: Computational thinking, language, computational irreducibility, computational universe
Notable quotes from "The Hidden Machinery of ChatGPT, Explained by Stephen Wolfram"
Steven will break down the mechanics of neural networks, large language models, and his groundbreaking concept of computational thinking. A powerful way to solve problems that could transform not just technology, but the.
about language · atWas interested in those kinds of things and that got me interested in kind of how things like spacecraft work and that got me interested in physics and [snorts] so I started…
about Spacecraft · atAlso a little bit shocking how slowly kind of big ideas move. for example, the neural nets that everybody's so excited about now in AI, neural nets were invented in 1943. And…
about neural nets · atOf formalization of the world with first with things like logic that was back in antiquity and then with math and most recently with computation where we're kind of setting up…
about Antiquity · atThese different fields, call them X, you start seeing the computational X field start to come into existence. And kind of my I suppose one of my big life missions has been to…
about Computational X · atOne of the things that kind of is a big piece of bunch of science I've done is this thing called the principle of computational equivalence which is kind of this discovery this…
about principle of computational equivalence · atEnd. Well, the fact that there's this principle of computational equivalence implies this thing I call computational irreducibility, which is this the realization that there…
about computational irreducibility · atAnd in fact, some part of my life has been exploring kind of the science of the computational universe, what's out there that you can compute. And the thing that's a little bit…
about computational universe · at
Who and what is mentioned in this episode?
People
- Steven Wolfram — Person · 25 mentions
Books & papers
- A New Kind of Science — Book · 1 mention · first at
Understanding about how science works. I wrote this big book back in 2002 called a new kind of science which is well its title kind of says what it is. it's that was so that's…
- Elementary Introduction to Wolfram Language — Book · 1 mention
Companies & orgs
- Wolfram Research — Company · 3 mentions
Products & tech
- Wolfram|Alpha — Product · 2 mentions
- Revolve Holiday Shop — Product · 1 mention · first at
Extra small to 4X. And since it's that time of the year, you've got to check out the Revolve Holiday Shop.
Concepts & topics
- language — Concept · 22 mentions · first at
- neural nets — Concept · 8 mentions · first at
- Computational thinking — Concept · 7 mentions · first at
Neural networks, large language models, and his groundbreaking concept of computational thinking. A powerful way to solve problems that could transform not just technology, but the way we approach life and work itself.
- Intelligence — Concept · 5 mentions · first at
Underway and it's been filled with insights from the greatest minds in artificial intelligence. In the last episode we featured the godmother of AI, Dr. Feel Lee and we talked…
- Computational X — Concept · 4 mentions · first at
- computational irreducibility — Concept · 3 mentions · first at
- computational universe — Concept · 3 mentions · first at
- Logic — Concept · 3 mentions
- Antiquity — Concept · 2 mentions · first at
- principle of computational equivalence — Concept · 2 mentions · first at
- atoms — Concept · 2 mentions
- space is made of discrete things — Concept · 2 mentions
- AI Vault series — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Hello young and profiters. If you've been following along you already know our AI vault series is well underway and it's been filled with insights from the greatest minds in…
- Computational science — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Wolfframe Alpha and he's one of the greatest scientific thinkers of our time when it comes to computational science and the nature of intelligence.
- Spacecraft — Concept · 1 mention · first at
- Particle physics — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Physics and so happened that the early 1970s were a time when lots of things were happening in particle physics. Lots of new particles getting discovered, lots of fast progress and so on. And so I got involved in that.
- Late 1940s — Concept · 1 mention · first at
That we're going to as soon as computers were invented, so electronic computers invented basically in the late 1940s and they started to become sort of things that people had…
- Machine translation — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Human interpreter. Let's teach a machine to do that translation. Beginning of the 1960s. And of course, machine translation, which is now finally in the 2020s pretty good, took an extra, 60 years to actually happen. And people just didn't.
- Pattern matching — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Or that's a picture of a dog. And this question of how do we do that kind of pattern matching I got interested in and started trying to figure out how to make that work. I knew…
- Late 2022 — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Neural nets and deep learning and so on and you know when it when chatbt came out in late 2022 again the people who've been working on it they didn't know it was going to work…
- Social sciences — Concept · 1 mention · first at
That worked pretty well in physics. It worked pretty terribly in things like biology in social sciences and so on.
- Mathematical notation — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Mission to what people did maybe 500 years ago when people invented mathematical notation. I mean there was a time when if you wanted to talk about math it was all in terms of…
- universe as a computational process — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Last few years is that it looks like we really can understand the whole of what happens in the universe as a computational process that sort of underneath them people kind of…
- photons — Concept · 1 mention · first at
Individual atoms and molecules and so on. Then light is made of discrete stuff, photons and so on. Space people had still assumed was somehow continuous was not made of…
- 1600s — Concept · 1 mention
- 1956 — Concept · 1 mention
- 1969 — Concept · 1 mention
- Airbnb co-host network — Concept · 1 mention
- Equal sign (=) — Concept · 1 mention
- Java — Concept · 1 mention
- PCs — Concept · 1 mention
- Plus sign (+) — Concept · 1 mention
Sponsors
- revolve.com/profiting — Sponsor · 1 mention · first at
Out or a holiday party, your dream wardrobe is just one click away at revolve.com/profiting.
- code PROFITING — Sponsor · 1 mention · first at
Shop myit and take 15% off your first order with code profiting. Fast 2-day shipping, easy returns. It's literally the only place you need to shop from.
- $75 sponsored job credit — Sponsor · 1 mention · first at
Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com/profiting.
- indeed.com/profiting — Sponsor · 1 mention · first at
Get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com/profiting.
- Shopify $1 per month trial — Sponsor · 1 mention
Full transcript with timestamps
AI is is another step in the automation of things. This is the coming paradigm of the 21st century.
Dr. Steven Wolffra. He's an award-winning renowned computer scientist mathematician a theoretical physicist, and the founder of Wolffra Research.
More and more systems in the world will get automated. When things get automated, things humans used to have to do with their own hands, they don't have to do anymore. Of all the things that are out there to compute, the set that we humans have cared about so far in the developments of our civilization is a tiny tiny tiny slice. The AI left to its own devices is an infinite set of things that it could be doing. The question is
AI potentially being sentient or having any sort of agency. How does this make you feel about human consciousness? The thing that we learned from sort of the advance of AI is well actually there's not as much distance between sort of the amazing stuff of our minds and things that are just able to be constructed computationally. I mean one of the things to realize is
hello young and profiters. If you've been following along you already know our AI vault series is well underway and it's been filled with insights from the greatest minds in artificial intelligence. In the last episode we featured the godmother of AI, Dr. Feel Lee and we talked about human centered AI and this week we're featuring Steven Wolffra. Steven is the founder of Wolffra Research, the creator of Mathematica and Wolfframe Alpha and he's one of the greatest scientific thinkers of our time when it comes to computational science and the nature of intelligence.
If you've ever wondered what's really happening inside chat GBT or how AI systems actually think, this is a conversation you won't want to miss. Steven will break down the mechanics of neural networks, large language models, and his groundbreaking concept of computational thinking. A powerful way to solve problems that could transform not just technology, but the way we approach life and work itself. We'll cover the future of AI, its impact on jobs, creativity, and society, and why intelligence may be far bigger and more universal than we've ever imagined. And guys, if you're new here, don't just listen. Make sure you subscribe so you can stay plugged into all these different AI conversations coming up. Without further ado, here's my conversation with Stephen Wolfran.
Stephen, welcome to Young and Profiting Podcast. Hello there. Hi. I am so excited for today's interview. We love the topic of AI and I wanted to talk a little bit about your childhood before we got into the meat and potatoes of today's interview. So from my understanding, you started as a particle physicist at a very young age. You even started publishing scholarly papers as young as 15 years old. So talk to us about how you first got interested in science and what you were like as a kid.
Well, let's see. I I grew up in England in the 1960s when space was the thing of the future, which it is again now, but wasn't for 50 years. Um and uh so I I was interested in those kinds of things and that got me interested in kind of how things like spacecraft work and that got me interested in physics and [snorts] so I started learning about physics and uh so happened that the early 1970s were a time when lots of things were happening in particle physics. Lots of new particles getting discovered, lots of uh fast progress and so on. And so I got involved in that.
It's always cool to be involved in fields that are in their kind of golden age of expansion, which particle physics was at the time. So, so that was uh was how I got into these things. You know, it's funny you mentioned AI and I realized that when I was a kid, sort of uh machines that think were right around the corner,
just as you know, colonization of Mars was right around the corner, too. Um but uh it's it's kind of um an interesting thing to see what what actually happens over a 50 year span and and what doesn't. And we're
it's so Go ahead. I was going to say yeah it's so crazy to think how much has changed over the last 50 years
and how much has not. I mean I you know I've been in science for example I have just been finishing some projects that I started basically 50 years ago. Um, and it's kind of cool to finish something that when you know there's a a big science question that I started asking when I was 12 years old about how a thing that people have studied for 150 years now uh works the second law of thermodynamics and I was sort of uh kind of interested in that when I was 12 years old and I I finally I think figured that out. I published a book about it last year. Um, and uh, it's kind of kind of kind of nice to see that one can tie up these things, but it's also a little bit shocking how slowly kind of big ideas move. I mean, for example, the neural nets that uh, everybody's so excited about now in AI, neural nets were invented in 1943. And the the original kind of conception of them is not that different from what
people use today, except that now we have computers that run billions of times faster than things that were imagined back in the 1950s and and so on. But it's it's um uh it is both it's interesting. Some things occasionally things happen very quickly. oftent times it's shocking how slow things how slowly things happen and how long it takes for the world to kind of uh absorb ideas and you know some sometimes there'll be an idea and finally some technology will make it possible to execute that idea in a way that wasn't there before sometimes there's an idea and it's been hanging out for a long time and people just ignored it for one reason or another and uh I think you know some of the things that are happening with AI today probably could have happened a bit earlier. Um the the uh some things have depended on sort of the building of a of a big technology stack. But it's it's always interesting to see that to me at
least. It's so fascinating and this actually dovetales perfectly into my next question is uh about your first experiences with AI. So now everybody knows what AI is, but really most of us really started to understand it and and using this term maybe 5 years ago max, but you've been kind of studying this for decades, even before people probably called it AI. So can you talk to us about the beginnings of how it all started?
AI predates me. AI was that that that term was invented in 1956. Um I I know the couple of I I knew that they're dead now, but the couple of characters who who invented that term, um it's uh uh you know, it's funny because the idea that we're going to as soon as computers were invented, so electronic computers invented basically in the late 1940s and they started to become sort of things that people had seen by the beginning of the 1960s. like I I probably I first saw a computer when I was 10 years old, which was 1969ish.
Um and uh the time, you know, a computer was a very big thing tended by people in white coats and so on. And um uh it's I first sort of got my hands on a computer in uh 1972 and that was a computer that was kind of the size of a large desk and program with paper tape and so on and uh was was rather primitive by today's standards but um uh kind of the elements were all there by that time. But most people had it's true most people had not seen a computer until probably the beginning of the 1980s or something. um and which was when PCs and things like that started started to come out. But uh you know it was from the very first moments when electronic computers came on the scene, people sort of assumed that computers would automate thought as bulldozer bulldozers and things like forklift trucks had automated kind of mechanical uh work. And you know that was the you know the the giant electronic brains was a typical
characterization of computers in the 1950s. So this idea that you know one would automate thought was a very early idea. That was that was um now the question was how easy how hard was it going to be to do that? And people in the 1950s and beginning of the 1960s they were like this is going to be easy. You know now we have these computers it's going to be easy to replicate what brains do. In fact, a good example back in the beginning of the 1960s a famous incident was uh there was there was during the cold war and people were worried about you know US Russian Soviet communication and so on. They said, "Well, you know, maybe the people are in a room. There's some interpreter. The interpreter is going to not translate things correctly. So, let's not use a human interpreter. Let's teach a machine to do that translation." Beginning of the 1960s. And of course, machine translation, which is now finally in the
2020s pretty good, took an extra, you know, 60 years to actually uh uh to actually happen. And people just didn't have the intuition about what was going to be hard, what wasn't going to be hard. So the the kind of the the term AI was sort of in the air already very much by the by the 1960s. I'm sure when I was a kid, I'm sure I read, you know, sort of books about the future in which AI was a thing. And it was certainly in in movies and things like that. And I think then this question of okay, so how would we get computers to do sort of thinking like things? You know, when I was a kid, I was interested in kind of taking sort of the the knowledge of the world and somehow cataloging it and so on. I don't know why I got interested in that, but that's something been interested in for a long time. And so I started thinking, you know, how would we take kind of the knowledge of the world and make it
automatic to be able to answer questions based on sort of the knowledge that our civilizations accumulated. And uh by the time uh so I I started building things along those lines and I I started building whole [snorts] technology stack that I started in the late 1970s and and um uh well now it's turned into a big thing that lots of people use but um that kind of the the idea there the first idea there was let's be able to compute things like math and so on and let's let's sort of take what has been something that humans have to and make it automatic to have computers do it. So that was a thing when it when it came to for example people had said for a while when computers can do calculus then we'll know that they're intelligent.
Okay. So you know things I built solved that problem by the by the mid 1980s that problem was pretty well solved and uh then people say well it's just engineering it's not really a computer sort of being intelligent. I would agree with that. But then actually at the at the very beginning of the 1980s when I was working on kind of automating things like mathematical computation, I [snorts] got curious about sort of the more general problem of sort of doing the kinds of things that we humans do like we match patterns. We say that's a picture, you know, we see this this image and it's got a bunch of pixels in it and we say that's a picture of a cat or that's a picture of a dog. And this question of how do we do that kind of pattern matching I got interested in and started trying to figure out how to make that work. I knew about neural nets. I started trying to get this must have been 198081 something like that. I
started trying to get neural nets to do things like that but they didn't work at all at the time. Hopeless just um actually as it as it turns out
in a in a bizarre you know you say things happen quickly and I say things sometimes happen very slowly. Um the uh uh I was just working on something that is kind of a potential new direction for how neural nets and things like that might work. And I realized, you know, I did this once I worked on this once before and I pulled out this paper that I wrote in 1985 that has kind of this same basic idea that I was just very pr proud of myself for having uh figured out just uh last week. And um it's like well I started on it in 1985. Well, now you know I understand a bunch more and we have much more powerful computers.
Maybe I can make this idea work. But so the um this this notion that uh one could do there things that people thought would be hard for computers like doing calculus and so on. Uh you know we crushed that so to speak a long time ago. Then there were things that are super easy for people like tell that's a cat that's a dog which wasn't solved and I wasn't involved in the solving of that. That's something that um uh people worked on for a long time and and nobody thought it was going to work and then suddenly in 2011 sort of through a mistake some people who've been working on this for a long time kind of left a computer trying to train to tell things like cats from dogs for a month without paying attention to it. They came back.
They didn't think anything exciting would have happened and by golly it had worked and that's what kind of started the the the current enthusiasm about neural nets and deep learning and so on and uh you know when it when chatbt came out in in late 2022 again the people who've been working on it they didn't know it was going to work there had been previous you know we had worked on previous kinds of language models things that try to uh do things like predict what the next word will be in a sentence those sorts of things and they were really pretty crummy and suddenly uh for reasons that we still don't understand we kind of got above this threshold where it's like yes this is pretty humanlike um and uh it's not clear what caused that threshold. It's not clear whether you know we in our human languages for example we might have I don't know 40,000 words that are common in a language like like most languages
English as an example and um it's kind of you know that there's probably that number of words is somehow related to how big a an artificial brain you need to be able to deal with language in a reasonable way. And you know if our brains were bigger maybe we would routinely have languages with 200,000 words in them. We don't know. And maybe uh you know it's this kind of match between what what we can do with an artificial neural network versus what our human sort of biological neural nets managed to do. We managed to reach enough of a match that people say by golly the thing seems to be doing uh the kinds of things that that uh that we humans do. But that's um but I mean this this question what what's ended up happening is there this this sort of what us humans can quickly do like tell a cat from a dog or figure out what the next word in the sentence is likely to be. Then there are things that we humans
have actually found really hard to do like solve this math problem or figure out this thing in science or do this kind of simulation of what happens in the natural world. Those are things that with sort of the unaded brain doesn't manage to do very well on. But you know the big thing that's happened last 300 years or so is we built a bunch of kind of formalization of the world with first with things like logic that was back in antiquity and then with math and most recently with with computation where we're kind of setting up things so that we can talk about things in a more structured way than just the way that we think about them sort of off the top of our head so to speak.
What's up yap gang? So, I recently moved from Jersey City to Austin, and something I've been noticing is the style out here is totally different. And it made me look at my closet and go, "Okay, Holla, it's time for an upgrade." And the place that never lets me down is Revolve. And I just did a big fall pant haul, and I'm absolutely obsessed. I got so many new pants, and I totally fit that cool girl Austin vibe now. And the quality of Revolve is so good. Plus, they get new arrivals every single day. And they've got inclusive sizing from extra extra small to 4X. And since it's that time of the year, you've got to check out the Revolve Holiday Shop.
They've got sparkly dresses, cozy sets, and the cutest gifts and every holiday look that you'll need curated in one place. And for all of you young and profiting men out there, they also have men's clothing. And I'm definitely upgrading my man's wardrobe this winter. He's getting all clothes for Christmas. Whether it's a weekend away or a night out or a holiday party, your dream wardrobe is just one click away at revolve.com/profiting. Shop myit and take 15% off your first order with code profiting. Fast 2-day shipping, easy returns. It's literally the only place you need to shop from.
That's revolve.com/profiting to shop my favorites and get 15% off your first order with code profiting. That's profiting all uppercase. Offer available for a limited time. So, happy shopping. Yap bam. As entrepreneurs, we know one of the biggest obstacles to scaling is finding the right team fast. I know firsthand how agonizing it can be when you're ready to hire, but the perfect person takes forever to find. That's where Indeed comes in. Because when it comes to hiring, Indeed is all you need. Their sponsored jobs help you stand out so your listing reaches the right people quicker. And it really makes a difference. Sponsored jobs get 45% more applications than non-sponsored ones. I love that Indeed doesn't lock you into contracts or subscriptions. You only pay for results. And get this, 23 hires are made every minute on Indeed worldwide.
There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com/profiting. Just go to indeed.com/profiting right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com/profiting. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need. So that's so interesting and I know that you work on something called computational [clears throat] thinking and I think what you're saying now really relates to that. So help us understand the wolf project and computational thinking and how it's related to the fact that humans we need to formalize and organize things like you said like mathematics and logic. Why do we like what's the history behind that? Why do we need to do that as humans? And then how does it relate to computational thinking in the future?
Well, so there there's there's kind of things one can immediately figure out. One just sort of intuitively knows, oh, that's a cat, that's a dog, whatever. Then there are things where you have to kind of go through a process of working out what's true and or working out sort of how to construct this or that thing. When you're going through that process, you've got to have kind of solid bricks to start building that tower. And it's not something so so you have to So what are those bricks going to be made of? Well, you have to have something which has sort of definitive structure. And that's something where, for example, back in antiquity when logic got invented, it was kind of like, well, you can think vaguely, yeah, that sentence sounds kind of right. Or you can say, well, wait a minute, you know, this or that. If one of those things is true, then the that or that has to be true, etc., etc., etc. You've got some
structured way to think about things. And then [snorts] in 1600s, you know, math became sort of a popular way to think about the world. And then you could say, okay, we're looking at, well, roughly, you know, the a planet goes around the sun in roughly an ellipse, but let's let's put math into that. And then we can have this kind of way to actually compute what's going to happen. And then so for about 300 years kind of this this idea of math is going to explain how the world works at some level was kind of a dominant theme and that worked pretty well in physics. It worked pretty terribly in things like biology in social sciences and so on.
You know people imagine there might be a social physics of how society works that never really panned out. Um same so so there was sort of this question of uh things that there things where places where math had worked and it gave us a lot of modern engineering and so on and there cases where it hadn't really worked. I got pretty interested in this at the beginning of the 1980s and sort of figuring out how do you sort of formalize thinking about the world in a way that goes beyond what math provides one things like you know calculus and so on give one. And what I realized is that that you kind of you just think about well there are definite rules that describe how things work. And those rules are more stated in terms of oh you have this arrangement of black and white cells and then this happens and so on.
They're not things that you necessarily can write in mathematical terms in terms of multiplications and integrals and and things like this. And so I as a matter of science I kind of got interested in so what do these simple programs that you can describe as the these kind of systems as rules of being what do they typically do and kind of what one might have assumed is you have a program that's simple enough it's going to just do simple things. This turns out not to be true. Big surprise to me at least. I think to everybody else as well. It took took people a few decades to kind of absorb this point. It took me a a solid bunch of years to absorb this point, but you know I you just do these experiments, computer experiments, and you find out yes, you use a simple rule and no, it does a complicated thing. And that's that turns out to be pretty interesting if you want to understand how nature works because it seems like
that's kind of it's kind of the secret that nature uses to make a lot of the complicated stuff that we see the same phenomenon of simple rules, complicated behavior. So that turns into a whole big direction and and kind of new understanding about how science works. I wrote this big book back in 2002 called a new kind of science which is uh well its title kind of says what it is. Um it's um that that was uh uh so that's one kind of branch is sort of understanding the world in terms of sort of computational rules. Another thing has to do with taking the things that we normally think about whether that's you know how long is going to take how far is it from one city to another or you know how does how do we uh you know make this image have this this uh how do we remove you know this thing from this image or something like this things that we would normally think about and talk about and how do we take those kinds of
things and think about them in a structured computational way And so that that that has turned into a big enterprise in my life which is building our computational language this thing now called wolf from language that um uh powers a lot of kinds of well research and development kinds of things and also lots of actual practical systems in the world although when you are interacting with those systems you don't see what's what's inside them so to speak but um kind of the idea there is to make a a language language for describing things in the world which might be you know this is a a city. This is uh you know you might say what's it it it's it's both a uh the concept of a city and the actuality of the couple of hundred thousand cities that exist in the world where they are what their populations are lots of other data about them and being able to compute uh uh things about things in the world so to speak. And so
that's been sort of a big effort to build up that computational language. And and the thing that's that's kind of exciting that we're sort of on the cusp of I suppose is you know people who study things like science and so on for the last 300 years it's like okay you're you know to make this science really work you have to make it somehow mathematical.
Well the thing that's sort of now the case is that the sort of the new way to make science really work is to make it computational. And so you see all these different fields, you know, call them X, you start seeing the computational X field start to come into existence. And kind of my I suppose one of my big life missions has been to provide the sort of language and notation for making computational X for all X possible. It's kind of a similar mission to what people did maybe 500 years ago when people invented mathematical notation. I mean there was a time when if you wanted to talk about math it was all in terms of just regular words at the time in Latin but um the uh uh and then people invented things like plus signs and equal signs and so on and that kind of streamlined the way of talking about math and that's what led to for example algebra and then calculus and then all the kind of modern
mathematical science that we have and so similarly what I've been trying to do last 40 years or so is is build kind of a a computational language a notation for computation, a way of talking about things computationally that lets one sort of build computational X for all X. And one one of the great things that happens when you make things computational is not only do you have a clearer way to describe what you're talking about, but also your computer can help you figure it out, so to speak. And so you you get this kind of this this sort of superpower. As soon as you can express yourself computationally, you kind of tap into the super power of actually being able to compute things.
And that's that's amazingly powerful. And you know when when when I was a kid, as I say, in the 1970s and you know, physics was sort of hopping at the time because various new methods have been invented not related to computers. um at this time sort of all the computational X fields are just starting to kind of really really hop and it's starting to be possible to do to do really really interesting things and that's going to be sort of the an area of tremendous growth in the next however many years.
It sounds really really exciting. So my I I have a few follow-up questions to that. So you say that computational thinking is another layer in human evolution. And so I want to understand why you feel it's going to help humans evolve. Also curious to understand like the practical ways that you're using the wolf rim language and how it relates to AI at if it does at all.
Yeah. Yeah. Right. Well, so let's take the second thing first. Okay. So, so um Wolfen language is about representing the world computationally in a sort of precise computational way. It also happens to make use of a bunch of AI. But let's put that aside. The the um the the way that for example something like an LLM like a chat GPT or something like that it it's what it does is it makes up pieces of language. So, you know, it's it's if we have a sentence like, you know, the cat sat on the blank, what it will have done is it's read a billion web pages, chances are the the the the most common next word is going to be Matt. And it has kind of set itself up so that it kind of knows that the most common next word is Matt. So, let's write down Matt. So the big surprise is that it doesn't just do simple things like that. But having kind of built the structure from kind of reading all these web pages, it can write sort of
plausible sentences. Those sentences might make they they sort of sound like they make sense. They're kind of typical of what you might read. They might or might not actually have anything to do with reality in the world, so to speak. Um and uh so but that's working kind of the way humans immediately think about things. Then there's the separate whole idea of kind of formalized knowledge which is the thing that led to kind of modern science and so on. It's a different branch from kind of things humans just can quickly and naturally do. So in a sense wolf from language the the big contribution right now to sort of the world of of the emerging kind of AI language models all this kind of thing is that we have this computational view of the world which allows one to do precise computations and build up these kind of whole towers of consequences. So the typical setup and you'll see more more and more coming out along these
lines. Um, I mean, we built something with OpenAI back back, oh gosh, a year ago now. Uh, that was sort of a an early version of this is you've got the the language model and it's trying to make up words and then it gets to use as a tool our computational language. If it can formulate what it's talking about, well, you know, we have ways to take the natural language that it produces. We've had our wolf from Alpha system which came out in 2009 is a system that has natural language understanding. We sort of had solved the problem of small sentence you know one sentence at a time kind of uh what does this mean? Can we translate this natural language in English for example into computational language then compute an answer using potentially many many steps of computation. um and then then that's something that is sort of a solid answer that was computed from knowledge that we've curated etc etc etc. So kind of
the the the typical mode of interaction is there sort of a linguistic interface provided by things like LLMs and that that using our computational language as a tool to actually figure out hey this is the thing that's actually true so to speak and that's a that's a mechanism it's sort of uh it's the just as humans don't necessarily immediately know everything they but with tools they can get along way I suppose it's been sort of The story of my life at least is uh you know I I discovered computers as a tool back in 1972 and I've been using them ever since and managed to figure out well a number of interesting things in science and technology and so on by by using this kind of uh uh external to me kind of superpower tool of computation so to speak and that's um uh and it's kind of well the the the LLMs and the AIs get to do the same thing. So that's kind of the the how we sort of the the is there's that's sort of the
the core part of um the uh how the technology I've been building for a long time kind of most immediately fits into the the current sort of expansion of excitement about about AI and and language models and and so on. I think the uh I mean there are there are other pieces to this which have to do with how for example science that I've done relates to understanding more about how you can build other kinds of AI like things but that that's that's sort of a separate branch.
Yeah. Well this is so fascinating honestly you're teaching us so much. I feel like a lot of people tuning in are probably learning a lot of this stuff for the first time. But one thing that we all are using right now is chat GBT right. So everybody has sort of embraced chat GBT. It kind of feels like it's magic, right? When you're just getting something that is uh giving you something that a human could potentially write. Uh so I have a couple questions about chat GBT. You alluded to how it works a bit, but can you give us more detail about how neural networks work in general and what chat GBT is doing in the background to spit out something that looks like it's written by a human?
Yeah. So I mean neural networks. So, so you know the original inspiration for neural networks was understanding something about how brains work. You know in our brains we have about roughly 100 billion neurons. Each neuron is a little electrical device so to speak and they're kind of connected with things that kind of look under a microscope a bit like wires. So one neuron might be connected to a thousand or 10,000 other neurons in one's brain. And these neurons kind of they'll have a little electrical signal and then they'll pass on that electrical signal to another neuron and uh pretty soon you know there's one's gone through a whole chain of neurons and one says the word next word or whatever. Um the
[clears throat] uh and so this kind of the electrical machine kind of lots of things connected to things that was that's kind of how people imagine that brains work and and that's how neural nets are kind of an idealization of that uh set up in a computer where what one has these um uh these connections between sort of artificial neurons usually called weights. You often hear about people saying, you know, uh, this this thing has a trillion weights or something. Those are those are kind of the the connections between artificial neurons and each one has a number associated with it. And so what happens when you know when you ask chatbt something what will happen is it will take the words that it's seen so far the prompt and it will grind them up into numbers and it will take that sequence of numbers and feed that in as input to this network.
So it's just it's just saying here are it takes the words every more or less every word in English gets a number or every part of a word gets a number. You have the sequence of numbers. That sequence of numbers is is given as input to this essentially mathematical computation that goes through and says, okay, here's here's this arrangement of numbers. We multiply each number by this weight. Then we add up a bunch of numbers. Then we take sort of a threshold of those numbers and so on. And we keep doing this and we do it a sequence of times like a few hundred times for for typical kind of chat GBT type type behavior. few hundred times and then at the end we get out another number actually we get out another collection of numbers that represent the probabilities that the next word should be this or that. So in the example of the cat sat on the
the next word has probably very high probability 99% probability to be matt and uh you know 1% probability or.5% probability to be floor or something and then what what chatbt is doing is it's saying well usually I'm going to pick the most likely next word sometimes I'll pick a word that isn't the the absolutely most likely next word and it just keeps doing that so and The surprise is that just doing that kind of thing a word at a time gives you something that seems like a reasonable English sentence. Now the next question is well how did it figure out all those weights that how did it get all those all those in the case of the original chatbt I think it was 180 billion uh weights. Um, how did it how did it get those numbers? And the answer is what what it tried to do was it it was trained and it was trained by being shown all this text from the web. And what was happening was was like, well,
you've got one arrangement of weights. Okay, what what next word does that predict? Okay, that predicts turtle as the next word for the cat sat on the turtle is wrong. Let's change that. Let's see what happens if we, you know, adjust these weights in that way. Oh, we finally got it to say, Matt, great. That's the correct version of that particular weight. Well, you keep doing that over and over again. That's a takes huge amounts of computer effort. You keep on bashing it and trying to get it. No, no, no. You got it wrong. You know, adjust it slightly to make it closer to correct. Keep doing that long enough and you get something which is a neural net which has the property that it will typically reproduce the kinds of things it's seen. Now it's not enough to reproduce what it's seen because if you keep going writing a big long essay a lot of what's in that essay will never have been seen before. It will it will
be something that's those particular combination of words will never have been produced before. So then the question is well how does it extrapolate? How does it figure out something that it's never seen before? What words is it going to use when it never saw it before? And this is the thing which nobody knew what was going to happen. It's this is the thing where the big surprise is that the way it extrapolates is similar to the way we humans seem to extrapolate things. And presumably that's because its structure is similar to the structure of our brains. We don't really know why it sort of when it when it figures things out that that it hasn't seen before, why it does that in a kind of humanlike way.
That's kind of a scientific discovery. Now, we can say, you know, can we get an idea why this might happen? I think we have an idea why it might happen. And it's more or less this that you say, how do you put together an English sentence? Well, you kind of learn basic grammar. You say it's a noun, a verb, a noun. That's a sort of typical English sentence. But there are many noun verb noun English sentences that aren't really reasonable sentences. Like I don't know, uh uh the electron ate the moon. Okay, it's grammatically correct, but it's probably doesn't really mean anything except in some kind of poetic sense.
So the question then is then what you realize is there's a more elaborate construction kit about sentences that might mean something. And people have been have been intending to kind of create that construction kit for a couple of thousand years. I mean Aristotle started the time when he created logic. He started thinking about that kind of construction kit but nobody got around to doing it. And um but I think you know chat GBT and and LLM's kind of show us there is a construction kit of oh you know that word the if if it's blah ate blah the first blah better be a thing that eats things and there's a certain category of things that eat things and you know that's like animals and people and so on and [snorts] uh and so that's sort of part of the construction kit. So you end up with this kind of notion of a kind of semantic grammar of a a a way a construction kit of how you put words together. My guess is that's essentially
what chat GBT has discovered. And uh once we understand that more clearly, we'll probably be able to build things like chat GBT much more simply than it's very indirect way to do it to have this neural net and keep bashing it and say, you know, make it, you know, predict words better and so on. There's probably a more direct way to do the same kind of thing. But that's that's sort of what's what's happened. And this this moment when it becomes sort of human level performance, you know, very hard to predict when that will happen. It was it happened it's happened for things like uh well, it happened for kind of visual object recognition around 2011 2012 type time frame. Um it's uh it's hard to know when these things are going to happen for different kinds of human activities.
And I think uh but the thing to realize is there are human-like activities and then there are things that we have formalized where we've used you know math we've used other kinds of things as a way to kind of work things out systematically and that's a different kind of direction than the direction that things like neural nets are going in and that's you know happens to be the direction that I've spent a good part of my life trying to trying to build up and these things are very kind of complimentary in the sense that this the kind of things like the linguistic interface that are made possible by neural nets kind of feed into this kind of precise computation that uh that we that we can do on that side.
What's up young and profiters? And I can't believe we're already wrapping up 2025. This year has been so eventful for me. I've traveled a ton for work and squeezed in some time for fun, too. But lately, I've been soaking up life here in Austin. Great food, great vibes, amazing community. That said, the year's not over yet, and I still have a few trips left on my calendar. One last trip to New Jersey and maybe a beach getaway to Aruba if I can sneak it in. The best part is is even when I'm away, my place doesn't have to sit empty. Somebody else can enjoy it, too. With Airbnb's co-host network, hosting is easier than ever.
You can partner with a local co-host who handles all the day-to-day management from guest communication to design and styling and on-site support, so the stay runs smoothly even when you're away. Think of them as your local hosting superhero who knows the ins and outs of creating amazing guest experiences. Turn your space into an opportunity without adding more to your plate. Find a co-host at airbnb.com/host. Gap gang. If you run a small business, you know there's nothing small about it. As a business owner, I get it. My business has always been all-consuming.
Every decision feels huge and the stakes feel even bigger. What helped me the most when things get overwhelming was finding the right platform with all the tools I need to succeed. That's why I trust Shopify because they get it. They started small, too. Shopify powers millions of businesses around the world. From huge brands like Mattel and Gym Shark to brands just getting started. You can handle everything in one place. Inventory payments analytics marketing, and even global selling in over 150 countries. And with 99.99% uptime and the best converting checkout on the planet, you'll never miss a sale again. Get all the big stuff for your small business right with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period and start selling today at shopify.com/profiting.
Go to shopify.com/profiting. Again, that's shopify.com/profiting. This is so interesting. And and my next question for you is how does this make you feel about human consciousness and AI potentially being sentient or having any sort of agency?
Yeah. Well, I mean it's it's always a funny thing cuz we have an internal view of the fact that there's something going on inside for us. We experience the world and so on. Even when we're looking at other people, it's like it's just a guess that you know I know what's going on in my mind. It's just some kind of guess what's going on in your mind, so to speak. And we've developed, you know, the big discovery of our species is language. This way of packaging up the thoughts that are happening in my mind and being able to transmit them to you and having you unpack them and make similar thoughts perhaps in your mind, so to speak. So this this idea of of where can you sort of imagine that there's a mind that's operating that's something which we already we it's not obvious you know between different people we kind of always make that assumption when it comes to other animals it's like well we're not quite
sure but maybe we can kind of tell that the you know our cat had some emotional reaction which sort of reminded us of some human emotion and so on. [snorts] when it comes to our AIs, you know, I think that that increasingly people will have the view that that kind of the AIs are a bit like them. So when you say, well, is there is there a there there is there a thing inside? It's like, okay, is there a thing inside another person? It's it's, you know, if you say, well, well, but but you know, but we can tell that the other person is kind of thinking and doing all this stuff. Well, if we were to look inside the brain of that other person, all we'd find is a bunch of electrical signals going around and those add up to something where there's kind of uh you know we have the assumption that there's a there's a conscious mind there so to speak. So I think in um the thing that uh is sort of a we have always felt that sort of our
thinking and minds and so on are are very far away from other things that are happening in the world. I think the thing that we learned from sort of the advance of AI is well actually there's not as much distance between sort of the amazing stuff of our minds and things that are just able to be constructed computationally. I mean, one of the things to realize is that something that's come out of a bunch of science that I've done, this whole question of sort of what thinks what what where is their kind of computational stuff going on? And you might say, well, humans do that. Maybe our computers do that. Well, actually, nature does that, too. When, you know, people will have this thing, you know, the weather has a mind of its own. Well, what does that mean? Well, it it means typically operationally it means it seems like the weather is acting with free will. We can't predict what it's going to do. But if we say,
well, what's going on in the weather? Well, it's a bunch of uh kind of uh, you know, fluid dynamics and the atmosphere and this and that and the other and we say, well, how do we compare that with the electrical processes that are going on in our brains? They're both sort of computations that operate according to certain rules. The ones in our brains we're kind of familiar with. the ones in the weather we're not familiar with. But in some sense that both of these cases there's a a computation going on. And one of the things that kind of is a big piece of bunch of science I've done is this thing called the principle of computational equivalence which is kind of this this discovery this idea that if you look at different kinds of systems operating according to different rules whether it's a brain or the weather there is a certain there's a a commonality. is the same level of computation is achieved by those
different kinds of systems. And that's that's not obvious. It's it's kind of like you might say, well, I've got this system and it's just a system that's made from physics as opposed to the system that's the result of lots of biological evolution or whatever. Or I've got this system and it just operates according to these very simple rules that I can write down. It's it's kind of um uh the the um we've got um uh you might have thought that the sort of level of computation that will be achieved in those different cases would be very different. The big surprise is that it isn't. It's the same. And that has all kinds of consequences. Like if you say, okay, I've got this system in nature. Let me predict what's going to happen in it. Well, essentially what you're doing by by saying I'm going to predict what's going to happen is you're somehow setting yourself up as being smarter than the system in nature. it
will take it all these computational steps to figure out what it does. But you are going to just jump ahead and say this is what's going to happen in the end. Well, the fact that there's this principle of computational equivalence implies this thing I call computational irreducibility, which is this the the realization that there are many systems where to work out what will happen in that system, you have to do kind of an irreducible amount of computational work. And that's a that's a surprise because we kind of have been used to the idea that kind of science lets us kind of jump ahead and just say, "Oh, this is the what the answer is going to be." And this is kind of showing us from within science, it's showing us that there's a fundamental limitation where we can't do that. And that's that's important. You know, when it comes to thinking about things like AI, when you say things like, well, let's make sure that AIs
never do the wrong thing. Well, problem with that is there's this phenomenon of computational irreducibility. The AI is doing what the AI does. It's doing all these computations and so on. We can't know in advance. We can't just jump ahead and say, "Oh, we know what it's going to do." We are we are stuck kind of having to follow through these steps. We can try and make an AI where we can always know what it's going to do. Turns out that AI will be too dumb to be a serious AI. And in fact, we already we see that happening in recent times of people saying, "Let's make sure they don't do the wrong thing." Well, you put enough constraints, it can't really do the things that a computational system should be able to do, and it uh it doesn't really achieve the kind of this this level of of of capability that you might call sort of real AI, so to speak.
Next, I want to talk about how the world is going to change now that AI is here being more adapted by people. It's becoming more commonplace. How is it going to impact jobs and also if you can touch on you know the risks of AI like what are the biggest fears that people have around AI?
Well, I mean more and more systems in the world will get automated. This has been a story of technology throughout history. you know, AI is is another step in the automation of things. Um, it's kind of, you know, when things get automated, things humans used to have to do with their own hands, they don't have to do anymore. The the typical pattern of economies like in the US or something is, you know, 150 years ago in the US most people were doing agriculture. You had to do that with your own hands. Then machinery got built that let that be automated and the people who you know it's like well then nobody's going to have anything to do. Well it turned out they did have things to do because that very automation enabled a lot of new types of things that people could do and I think you know for example the thing that you know we're doing the podcasting thing we're doing right now is enabled
by sort of the fact that we have video communication and so on. There was a time when all of that automation that has now led to the kind of telecommunications infrastructure we have wasn't there and there had to be telephone switchboard operators, you know, plugging wires in and so on. And people were saying, "Oh gosh, you know, if we if we automate telephone switching, then all those jobs are going to go away." But actually, what happened was yes, those jobs went away, but that automation opened up many other categories of jobs. So the the typical thing that you see at least historically is a big category there's a there's a big chunk of jobs that are something that people have to do for themselves that gets automated and that enables what becomes many different possible things that you end up being able to do.
And I think the way to think about this is is really the following that that when once you've defined an objective you can build automation that does that objective. Maybe it takes 100 years to get to that automation, but you can in principle do that. But then you have the question, well, what are you going to do next? What what are the new things you could do? Well, that that question, there are an infinite number of new things you could do. The the you know, the AI left to its own devices, there's an infinite set of things that it could be doing. The question is which things do we choose to do? And that's something that is really a matter for us humans because it's like it's it's like you can compute anything you want to compute.
And in fact, some part of my life has been exploring kind of the the science of the computational universe, what's out there that you can compute. And the thing that's a little bit kind of sobering is to realize of all the things that are out there to compute the set that we humans have cared about so far in the developments of our civilization is a tiny tiny tiny slice like um and so that's the and and this question of sort of how do we where do we go from here so to speak is well what other slices which are now been now they're possible which things do we want to do and I think that the typical thing you see is that a lot of new jobs get created around the things which are still sort of a matter of human choice what you do eventually it kind of gets standardized and then it gets automated and then you go on to to another stage. I I think that the the spectrum of what jobs um sort of will be
automated, you know, one of the things that happened back oh several years ago now, the uh people were saying, oh, machine learning kind of the the sort of underlying area that leads to sort of neural nets and AI and things like this, you know, machine learning has kind of put all these people out of jobs. The thing that was sort of amusing to me was that I knew perfectly well that the first category of jobs that would be impacted were machine learning engineers because machine learning can be used to automate machine learning so to speak.
And so it was you know what what things disappear what things uh it's not it's not quite as uh it's not something where oh uh kind of well there's there's a lot of you know once the thing becomes routine then it can be automated and and for example a lot of people learn to do programming low-level programming you know I've spent a large part of my life trying to automate low-level programming so in other words the the computational language we've built built which you know people like, "Oh my gosh, I can do this. You know, I can I can get the computer to do this thing for me by spending an hour of my time. If I were writing kind of standard programming language code, I'd spend a month trying to set my computer up to do this."
That's kind of the the thing we've already achieved is to be able to automate out those kinds of things. What you realize when you automate out something like that is people say, "Oh my gosh, things have become so difficult now because if you're doing kind of low-level programming, some part of what you're doing is just routine work. You don't have to think that much. It's just like, oh, I turn the crank, I get the next, you know, I show up to work the next day. I I get this piece of code written. Well, if you've automated out all of that, what you realize is most of what you have to do is figure out, so what do I want to do next?
And that's where this kind of being able to do real computational thinking comes in because that's where it's like so how do you think about what you're trying to do in computational terms so you can define what you should do next. And I think that's that that's an example of you know the low-level kind of turn the crank programming. I mean that should be extinct already because because you know we've spent I've spent the last 40 years trying to automate that stuff and in some segments of the world it is kind of extinct because we we we did automate it but there's an awful lot of people where that they said oh we can get a good job by learning you know C code C program C++ programming or Python or Java or something like this that's that's what we'll um you know that's a thing that we can spend our human time doing it's not necessary um and and that's kind of that that's being more emphasized at this
point. The thing that is still very much the human thing is so what do you want to do next so to speak?
This is so interesting because it's a good story, you know, because you're not saying hey we're doomed. You're saying AI is going to actually create more jobs. It's going to automate the things that are repetitive and the things that we still need to make decisions on or decide the direction that we want to go in. That's what humans are going to be doing sort of shaping all of it. But do you feel that AI is going to like supersede us in intelligence and have this apex intelligence one day where we are not in control of the next thing?
Right. Well, so I you know mentioned the fact that lots of things in nature compute. Our brains do computation. The weather does computation. The weather is doing a lot more computation than our brains are doing. So if you say what's the apex intelligence in the world already nature has vastly more computation going on than happens to occur in our brains. The computation going on in our brains is computation where we say oh we understand what that is and we really care about that. Whereas the computation that goes on in the in the you know babbling brook or something we say well that's just some flow of water and things. We don't really care about that. So, so we already lost that that competition of are we the most computationally sophisticated things in the world? We're not. I mean, we're all many many things are equivalent in their computational abilities. So then the question is, well, what will it feel like when AI
gets to the point where routinely it's sort of doing doing all sorts of computation beyond what what we managed to do. I think it feels pretty much like what it feels like to live in the natural world. The natural world does all kinds of things. There are, you know, occasionally a tornado will happen, occasionally this will happen. We can kind of make some prediction about what's going to happen, but we don't know for sure what's going to happen, when it's going to happen, and so on. And that's kind of, I think, what it will sort of feel like to be in a world where most things will run with AI. and we'll be able to do some science of the AI saying just like we can do science of the natural world and say this is what we think is going to happen but there's going to be this kind of infrastructure of kind of AI society there already is to some extent but that will grow of more and more things that
are sort of happening automatically as a sort of computational process but in a sense that's no different from what happens in the natural world the natural world is just automatically doing things that are not where we can try and divert what it does but it's just doing what it does, so to speak. You know, it's it's for me it's it's kind of one of the things I've long been interested in is kind of how is the universe actually put together if we kind of drill down and look at the sort of smallest scales of of physics and so on. What's what's down there? And what we've discovered in the last few years is that it looks like we really can understand the whole of what happens in the universe as a computational process that sort of underneath them people kind of people have been arguing for couple of thousand years whether the world is made of sort of continuous things or whether it's made of little discrete things like
atoms and so on. And about bit more than 100 years ago it got nailed down matter is made of discrete stuff. There are individual atoms and molecules and so on. Then light is made of discrete stuff, photons and so on. Space people had still assumed was somehow continuous was not made of discrete stuff. And the thing we kind of well kind of nailed down I think in in 2020 was uh the idea that space really is made of discrete things. There are discrete elements, discrete kind of atoms of space. And we can really think of the universe is made of a sort of giant network of atoms of space. And [snorts] we we hopefully in the next few years maybe if we're lucky, we'll get sort of direct experimental evidence that space is discreet in that way. But one of the things that that makes one realize is it's sort of computation all the way down. at at this lowest level the universe consists of this sort of
discrete network that keeps on getting updated and it's kind of following these simple rules and so on. It's it's all rather lovely but but uh that that kind of makes one in a sense kind of there's computation everywhere in nature in our AIs and our brains the part that the computation that we care the most about is the part that we with our brains have and our civilization and our culture and so on have so far explored. That's the part we care the most about. Over progressively, we should be able to explore more and we as as sort of the computational X fields come into existence and so on that that and we get to use our computers and computational language and so on, we get to kind of to colonize more of the sort of computational universe and we get to bring more things into oh yes that's a thing we humans talk about. I mean if you go back you know the even just 100 years nobody was talking about all these
things that we now take for granted about computers and how they work and and how you can compute things and so on. That [snorts] was that was just not something within human kind of uh within our human sphere. Now the question is as we go forward with automation with kind of the formalization of computational language things like that what more will sort of be within our kind of human sphere it's hard to predict it is to some extent a choice there are things where we could go in this direction we could go in that direction these are things we will eventually humanize so to speak and they'll be you know it's it's also if you look at the course of human history and you say what did people think was worth doing a thousand years ago. A lot of things that people think are worth doing today, people absolutely didn't even think about. Like, you know, a good example perhaps is, you know, walking on a treadmill. That would just
seem just completely stupid to somebody from even a few hundred years ago. And and you kind of it's like, why would you do that? Well, I want to live a long life. Why do you even want to live a long life? Well, you know, that's because whatever that wasn't, you know, in in the past that might not even have been thought of as an objective and then this this, you know, that there's a sort of whole chain of why are we doing this? And that chain is is a is a thing of our time, so to speak. And and that will that will change over time. And I think that that the the the the kind of this I think what is possible in the world will change. What we get to have sort of explored out of the sort of computational universe of all possibilities will change. Uh there will no doubt be people who uh you know you ask you could ask the question will uh what will be the role of sort of the biological sort of you know
sort of biological intelligence so to speak versus all the other things in the world and as I say we're already somewhat in that situation. There are things about the natural world that just happen and some of those things are things that are much more powerful than us. You know, we don't get to sort of stop the earthquakes and so on. They're they're things that um so we we already are in that situation. It's just that the things that we are doing with with AI and so on, we we happen to be building a layer of that infrastructure that is sort of our own construction rather than something which has been there all the time in nature. And so we've kind of gotten used to it. But
this is so mindblowing. Honestly, it's so mind-blowing. But I love the fact that you seem to have like a positive attitude towards it. like you're not, you know, we've had other people on the show that sort of are are worried about AI, but you don't have that attitude towards it. It seems like you're more accepting of the fact that this is it's coming whether we like it or not, right? And to your point, we're already living in nature, which is way more intelligent than us anyway. And so maybe this is just an additional layer,
right? I I think I mean the you know, I'm I'm an optimistic person. And that's what happens if you it's it's a I've spent my life doing kind of large projects and building big things. You don't you don't do that unless you have a certain degree of optimism. But I think also that um uh you know in in the in the what will always be the case as as things change things that people have been doing will stop making sense. You know, you see this in in the intellectual sphere with sort of paradigms in science. It's like, well, somebody, you know, I mean, I built some new things in science where people at first say, "Oh my gosh, this is terrible. I've been doing this other thing for 50 years, you know, I don't want to learn this new stuff. This is this is, you know, this is a terrible thing." And I think you see that in uh uh you know there's a there's a lot in the world where people are like it's
good the way it is let's not change it. Well you know the the what's what's happening is in the sphere of ideas and in the sphere of technology sort of things change and I think to say you know the only things that um you know if you ask is it going to wipe our species out? I don't think so. But that would be a that would be a thing that we would probably think is definitively bad. Um if we say well you know I spent a lot of time learning how to do I don't know write I don't know I became you know a great programmer in some low-level programming language and by golly that's not a relevant skill anymore. Um you know yes that can happen. I mean for example in in my life I uh I got interested in physics when I was pretty young and you know when you do physics you end up having to do lots of mathematical calculations. I never like doing those things. I always thought but there were other people who were like
that's what they're into. That's what they like doing. I never like doing those things. So I taught computers to do them for me and me plus the computer did pretty well at doing those things. But it kind of one had automated that away. And that might have been seen as to me that was a big positive because it let me do a lot more. It let me kind of take what I was thinking about and get the sort of superpower to to figure out to to go go places with that. To other people that's like, oh my gosh, the thing that we really were good at doing of doing all these kind of mathematical calculations by hand and so on that just got automated away. You know, the thing that we like to do isn't a thing anymore. So you know that that's a dynamic that I think I think continues.
But you know having said that there are plenty of of ridiculous things that sort of get made possible by you know whenever there's powerful technology you can do ridiculous things with it. And you know the the question of exactly what kind of uh you know what what terrible scam will be made possible by what piece of AI that's that's always a bit hard to predict. It's a kind of a computational irreducibility story of of kind of this this kind of thing of what will people figure out how to do, what will the computers let them do and so on. But I'm [snorts] yes in in general terms it is my nature to be optimistic but I think also there is a there is kind of an optimistic path through sort of the way the world is changing so to speak.
Yeah. Well, it's really exciting. I can't wait to have you back on maybe in a year to hear all the other exciting updates that have happened with AI. I end my show asking two questions. Now, you don't have to use the topic of today's episode. You can just use your life experience to answer these questions. So, one is and you can be very quick. What is one actionable thing our young and profiters can do today to become more profitable tomorrow? And this is not just about money but profiting in life.
I mean, understand computational thinking. This is the this is the coming paradigm of the 21st century. And if you understand that well, it gives you a huge advantage. And if you say, you know, unfortunately, it's not like you go sign up for a computer science class and you'll learn that. Unfortunately, kind of the educational resources for learning about computational thinking aren't really fully there yet. And it's it's something which uh frustratingly after many years I've decided I have to I have to really build a bunch more of these things because other people aren't doing it and it'll be another you know decades before before it gets done otherwise. But but yes learn learn sort of computational thinking learn the tools that are around that. Um, that's a that's a kind of a a a a quick a quick way to kind of jump ahead in in in whatever you're doing because there's kind of a as you make it computational,
you get to think more clearly about it and you get the computer to help you kind of jump forward.
And where can people get resources from you to learn more about that? Where what where do you recommend? Well, I mean the the our kind of computational language wolf from language is kind of the main example of sort of where you get to do computational thinking. There's a book I wrote a few years ago called elementary introduction to wolf from language which is pretty accessible to people but hopefully in another well certainly within a year there should exist a thing that I'm working on right now which is kind of a directly an introduction to computational thinking but you'll find a bunch of resources around wolf from language that uh uh kind of sort of explain more although I don't think quite in the right way yet um kind of uh uh how one can think about things computationally. That that's kind of the the the raw material for doing that.
Okay. Well, whatever links that we find, I'll stick them in the show notes. And next time you if you have something and you're releasing it, make sure that you contact us so you can come back on Young and Profiting Podcast. Stephen, thank you so much for your time. We really enjoyed having you on Young and Profiting Podcast.
Questions about this episode
What is "The Hidden Machinery of ChatGPT, Explained by Stephen Wolfram" about?
The discussion explores the transformative role of AI as it automates human tasks, highlighting the extensive potential of AI systems compared to the limited scope of human computation. Dr. Stephen Wolfram, a leading expert in computational science, delves into the mechanics of neural networks and large language models, raising questions about AI's potential sentience and its implications for…
What is mentioned in this Young and Profiting episode?
43 people, works and ideas are mentioned, including Steven Wolfram, language, neural nets, Computational thinking, Intelligence, Computational X. Each one on this page links to its own page with every episode that mentions it.
How long is "The Hidden Machinery of ChatGPT, Explained by Stephen Wolfram"?
The episode runs 1 h 9 min; the transcript is about 13,100 words in 98 timestamped sections.
More from Young and Profiting
About this transcript: the episode's spoken words as captioned on YouTube, split into timestamped sections. Reclip.Me locates every person, work and idea in the text, keeps the time it is first named, and quotes the words around it verbatim. Last updated January 24, 2026.